François Lellouche, Laura-Ann Cyr, Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard
{"title":"Sedaconda吸入镇静装置的台架评价:湿度计性能和装置阻力。","authors":"François Lellouche, Laura-Ann Cyr, Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Sedaconda Anesthetic Conserving Device (ACD-S) is used for inhaled sedation in intubated patients and has passive humidification properties linked to the carbon material. However, limited evaluations of the hygrometric performance are available. The main aim of the study was to assess the humidification performance of this device with different ventilator settings and ambient temperatures. <b>Methods:</b> We assessed hygrometry of inspiratory gases and resistance of the Sedaconda ACD-S using a bench test. Hygrometric measurements were performed with 5 min ventilations from 4.8 to 18 L/min (at constant ambient temperature: 25 ± 1°C) and with 3 ambient temperatures, 22-24°C, 25 ± 1°C, and 28-30°C (at constant minute ventilation: 10 L/min). Simulation of physiologic expiratory gases with an absolute humidity of 35 mg H<sub>2</sub>O/L was used for main measurements. Some measurements were made with expiratory humidity of 27.5 mg H<sub>2</sub>O/L which corresponds to what is found in patients with moderate hypothermia. Three hygrometric measurements using the psychrometric method were performed for each tested condition. Device resistance was evaluated before utilization and after 96 h on the humidified bench and compared with a paper- and foam-based heat and moisture exchangers (HME) with similar dead spaces. <b>Results:</b> In tested conditions, mean humidity output was 29.8 ± 1.3 mg H<sub>2</sub>O/L. We found slightly lower humidity output at low versus high minute ventilation (respectively 28.0 ± 0.3 vs 30.6 ± 0.3, <i>P</i> < .001) and lowest versus highest ambient temperature (29.6 ± 0.3 vs 31.0 ± 0.2 mg H<sub>2</sub>O/L, <i>P</i> = .02). These differences are probably not clinically important. We found a linear relationship between expiratory and inspiratory humidity (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.98, <i>P</i> < .001). Resistance of the tested device was higher, in comparison with paper- and foam-based HMEs, and increased slightly after 96 h of use on the bench. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Sedaconda ACD-S is a high-performance passive humidifier device, within all tested conditions of minute ventilation, tidal volume, and ambient temperature. Resistance was slightly higher compared with HMEs with similar dead space and different materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bench Evaluation of the Sedaconda Inhaled Sedation Device: Hygrometric Properties and Device Resistance.\",\"authors\":\"François Lellouche, Laura-Ann Cyr, Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/respcare.12987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Sedaconda Anesthetic Conserving Device (ACD-S) is used for inhaled sedation in intubated patients and has passive humidification properties linked to the carbon material. However, limited evaluations of the hygrometric performance are available. The main aim of the study was to assess the humidification performance of this device with different ventilator settings and ambient temperatures. <b>Methods:</b> We assessed hygrometry of inspiratory gases and resistance of the Sedaconda ACD-S using a bench test. Hygrometric measurements were performed with 5 min ventilations from 4.8 to 18 L/min (at constant ambient temperature: 25 ± 1°C) and with 3 ambient temperatures, 22-24°C, 25 ± 1°C, and 28-30°C (at constant minute ventilation: 10 L/min). Simulation of physiologic expiratory gases with an absolute humidity of 35 mg H<sub>2</sub>O/L was used for main measurements. Some measurements were made with expiratory humidity of 27.5 mg H<sub>2</sub>O/L which corresponds to what is found in patients with moderate hypothermia. Three hygrometric measurements using the psychrometric method were performed for each tested condition. Device resistance was evaluated before utilization and after 96 h on the humidified bench and compared with a paper- and foam-based heat and moisture exchangers (HME) with similar dead spaces. <b>Results:</b> In tested conditions, mean humidity output was 29.8 ± 1.3 mg H<sub>2</sub>O/L. We found slightly lower humidity output at low versus high minute ventilation (respectively 28.0 ± 0.3 vs 30.6 ± 0.3, <i>P</i> < .001) and lowest versus highest ambient temperature (29.6 ± 0.3 vs 31.0 ± 0.2 mg H<sub>2</sub>O/L, <i>P</i> = .02). These differences are probably not clinically important. We found a linear relationship between expiratory and inspiratory humidity (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.98, <i>P</i> < .001). Resistance of the tested device was higher, in comparison with paper- and foam-based HMEs, and increased slightly after 96 h of use on the bench. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Sedaconda ACD-S is a high-performance passive humidifier device, within all tested conditions of minute ventilation, tidal volume, and ambient temperature. Resistance was slightly higher compared with HMEs with similar dead space and different materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12987\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12987","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Sedaconda麻醉保存装置(ACD-S)用于插管患者的吸入镇静,并具有与碳材料相关的被动湿化特性。然而,有限的湿度计性能的评估是可用的。本研究的主要目的是评估该设备在不同通风机设置和环境温度下的加湿性能。方法:采用台架试验法对赛康达ACD-S吸入气体的湿性测定和阻力进行评估。湿度测量在5分钟内进行,通风为4.8 - 18 L/min(恒定环境温度:25±1°C),环境温度为22-24°C、25±1°C和28-30°C(恒定分钟通风:10 L/min)。主要测量采用模拟绝对湿度为35 mg H2O/L的生理性呼气气体。一些测量是在呼气湿度为27.5 mg H2O/L时进行的,这与中度低温患者的呼气湿度相对应。使用湿法对每个测试条件进行了三次湿度计测量。在使用前和96 h后,在加湿的工作台上评估设备的电阻,并与具有类似死区的纸基和泡沫基热交换器(HME)进行比较。结果:在测试条件下,平均湿度输出为29.8±1.3 mg H2O/L。我们发现,低分钟通风量与高分钟通风量相比,湿度输出略低(分别为28.0±0.3 vs 30.6±0.3,P < 0.001),最低环境温度与最高环境温度相比,湿度输出略低(29.6±0.3 vs 31.0±0.2 mg H2O/L, P = 0.02)。这些差异在临床上可能并不重要。我们发现呼气和吸气湿度之间存在线性关系(R2 = 0.98, P < 0.001)。与纸基和泡沫基HMEs相比,测试装置的电阻更高,并且在台架上使用96 h后略有增加。结论:Sedaconda ACD-S是一种高性能的被动式加湿器,适用于分气量、潮气量、环境温度等所有测试条件。与死区相似和材料不同的HMEs相比,阻力略高。
Bench Evaluation of the Sedaconda Inhaled Sedation Device: Hygrometric Properties and Device Resistance.
Background: The Sedaconda Anesthetic Conserving Device (ACD-S) is used for inhaled sedation in intubated patients and has passive humidification properties linked to the carbon material. However, limited evaluations of the hygrometric performance are available. The main aim of the study was to assess the humidification performance of this device with different ventilator settings and ambient temperatures. Methods: We assessed hygrometry of inspiratory gases and resistance of the Sedaconda ACD-S using a bench test. Hygrometric measurements were performed with 5 min ventilations from 4.8 to 18 L/min (at constant ambient temperature: 25 ± 1°C) and with 3 ambient temperatures, 22-24°C, 25 ± 1°C, and 28-30°C (at constant minute ventilation: 10 L/min). Simulation of physiologic expiratory gases with an absolute humidity of 35 mg H2O/L was used for main measurements. Some measurements were made with expiratory humidity of 27.5 mg H2O/L which corresponds to what is found in patients with moderate hypothermia. Three hygrometric measurements using the psychrometric method were performed for each tested condition. Device resistance was evaluated before utilization and after 96 h on the humidified bench and compared with a paper- and foam-based heat and moisture exchangers (HME) with similar dead spaces. Results: In tested conditions, mean humidity output was 29.8 ± 1.3 mg H2O/L. We found slightly lower humidity output at low versus high minute ventilation (respectively 28.0 ± 0.3 vs 30.6 ± 0.3, P < .001) and lowest versus highest ambient temperature (29.6 ± 0.3 vs 31.0 ± 0.2 mg H2O/L, P = .02). These differences are probably not clinically important. We found a linear relationship between expiratory and inspiratory humidity (R2 = 0.98, P < .001). Resistance of the tested device was higher, in comparison with paper- and foam-based HMEs, and increased slightly after 96 h of use on the bench. Conclusions: The Sedaconda ACD-S is a high-performance passive humidifier device, within all tested conditions of minute ventilation, tidal volume, and ambient temperature. Resistance was slightly higher compared with HMEs with similar dead space and different materials.
期刊介绍:
RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.