麻醉儿童和青少年颞下颌关节强直患者柔性支气管镜插管时自主呼吸与麻痹技术的比较:随机平行组试验。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Roopa, Devalina Goswami, Souvik Maitra, Ajoy Roychoudhury, Ongkilla Bhutia, Ramkumar Mukundarajan, Dalim Kumar Baidya
{"title":"麻醉儿童和青少年颞下颌关节强直患者柔性支气管镜插管时自主呼吸与麻痹技术的比较:随机平行组试验。","authors":"Roopa, Devalina Goswami, Souvik Maitra, Ajoy Roychoudhury, Ongkilla Bhutia, Ramkumar Mukundarajan, Dalim Kumar Baidya","doi":"10.1111/pan.15130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literature is sparse on airway management in temporomandibular joint ankylosis patients, and it is not known whether spontaneous or paralyzed technique of intubation will be better for flexible bronchoscopic intubation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation between the spontaneously breathing and paralyzed groups in anesthetized children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this Randomized parallel group study, after ethics committee approval and trial registration, we enrolled 70 children and adolescents up to 18 years with temporomandibular joint ankylosis and mouth opening < 1.5 cm scheduled for elective surgery after informed written consent from the parents. Patients were randomized into anesthetized spontaneous breathing (group S) and paralyzed (group P) groups. The primary objective was the incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation. Secondary outcomes were time to glottis, carina, time required for intubation, desaturation, coughing/movement, and hemodynamics during intubation and postoperative sore throat. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 29.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline and demographic data were comparable. The paralyzed group had a significantly lower incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation [group P versus group S: 1 (2.86%) vs. 18 (51.42%), p < 0.001; RR (95% CI): 0.06 (0.01-0.39)], lower time to visualize the glottis [Median difference 30 (24, 36) sec, p < 0.001], lower time to the carina [Median difference 62 (29, 94) sec; p = 0.001], lower time to intubation [Median difference 97 (59, 135) sec, p = 0.003], lower incidence of vocal cord closure [-20% (-33.3% to -6.7%); p = 0.005], lower incidence of blood in the bronchoscopy field [-28.6% (-44.9% to -12.2%); p = 0.002], and lower incidence of desaturation [-14.3% (-27.9% to -0.63%); p = 0.04] compared to the spontaneous group. Coughing, hemodynamic response to intubation, and postoperative sore throat were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Paralyzed technique is associated with lower incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation compared to spontaneously breathing technique in children and adolescents with temporomandibular joint ankylosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2022/03/041362.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Spontaneous Breathing Versus Paralyzed Technique During Flexible Bronchoscopic Intubation in Anesthetized Children and Adolescents With Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis: Randomized Parallel Group Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Roopa, Devalina Goswami, Souvik Maitra, Ajoy Roychoudhury, Ongkilla Bhutia, Ramkumar Mukundarajan, Dalim Kumar Baidya\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.15130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literature is sparse on airway management in temporomandibular joint ankylosis patients, and it is not known whether spontaneous or paralyzed technique of intubation will be better for flexible bronchoscopic intubation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation between the spontaneously breathing and paralyzed groups in anesthetized children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this Randomized parallel group study, after ethics committee approval and trial registration, we enrolled 70 children and adolescents up to 18 years with temporomandibular joint ankylosis and mouth opening < 1.5 cm scheduled for elective surgery after informed written consent from the parents. Patients were randomized into anesthetized spontaneous breathing (group S) and paralyzed (group P) groups. The primary objective was the incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation. Secondary outcomes were time to glottis, carina, time required for intubation, desaturation, coughing/movement, and hemodynamics during intubation and postoperative sore throat. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 29.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline and demographic data were comparable. The paralyzed group had a significantly lower incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation [group P versus group S: 1 (2.86%) vs. 18 (51.42%), p < 0.001; RR (95% CI): 0.06 (0.01-0.39)], lower time to visualize the glottis [Median difference 30 (24, 36) sec, p < 0.001], lower time to the carina [Median difference 62 (29, 94) sec; p = 0.001], lower time to intubation [Median difference 97 (59, 135) sec, p = 0.003], lower incidence of vocal cord closure [-20% (-33.3% to -6.7%); p = 0.005], lower incidence of blood in the bronchoscopy field [-28.6% (-44.9% to -12.2%); p = 0.002], and lower incidence of desaturation [-14.3% (-27.9% to -0.63%); p = 0.04] compared to the spontaneous group. Coughing, hemodynamic response to intubation, and postoperative sore throat were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Paralyzed technique is associated with lower incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation compared to spontaneously breathing technique in children and adolescents with temporomandibular joint ankylosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2022/03/041362.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于颞下颌关节强直患者气道管理的文献较少,对于柔性支气管镜插管,自发性插管技术和麻痹式插管技术哪一种更好尚不清楚。目的:比较麻醉后自主呼吸组和麻痹组儿童及青少年气管插管困难的发生率。方法:在这项随机平行组研究中,经伦理委员会批准和试验注册,我们招募了70名18岁以下颞下颌关节强直和张嘴的儿童和青少年。结果:基线和人口统计学数据具有可比性。麻痹组与S组比较:1(2.86%)比18(51.42%)。结论:麻痹技术与自主呼吸技术相比,在儿童和青少年颞下颌关节强直患者中,支气管镜插管困难(2.86%)发生率较低。试验报名:CTRI/2022/03/041362。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Spontaneous Breathing Versus Paralyzed Technique During Flexible Bronchoscopic Intubation in Anesthetized Children and Adolescents With Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis: Randomized Parallel Group Trial.

Background: Literature is sparse on airway management in temporomandibular joint ankylosis patients, and it is not known whether spontaneous or paralyzed technique of intubation will be better for flexible bronchoscopic intubation.

Aim: To compare the incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation between the spontaneously breathing and paralyzed groups in anesthetized children and adolescents.

Methods: In this Randomized parallel group study, after ethics committee approval and trial registration, we enrolled 70 children and adolescents up to 18 years with temporomandibular joint ankylosis and mouth opening < 1.5 cm scheduled for elective surgery after informed written consent from the parents. Patients were randomized into anesthetized spontaneous breathing (group S) and paralyzed (group P) groups. The primary objective was the incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation. Secondary outcomes were time to glottis, carina, time required for intubation, desaturation, coughing/movement, and hemodynamics during intubation and postoperative sore throat. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 29.

Results: Baseline and demographic data were comparable. The paralyzed group had a significantly lower incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation [group P versus group S: 1 (2.86%) vs. 18 (51.42%), p < 0.001; RR (95% CI): 0.06 (0.01-0.39)], lower time to visualize the glottis [Median difference 30 (24, 36) sec, p < 0.001], lower time to the carina [Median difference 62 (29, 94) sec; p = 0.001], lower time to intubation [Median difference 97 (59, 135) sec, p = 0.003], lower incidence of vocal cord closure [-20% (-33.3% to -6.7%); p = 0.005], lower incidence of blood in the bronchoscopy field [-28.6% (-44.9% to -12.2%); p = 0.002], and lower incidence of desaturation [-14.3% (-27.9% to -0.63%); p = 0.04] compared to the spontaneous group. Coughing, hemodynamic response to intubation, and postoperative sore throat were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion: Paralyzed technique is associated with lower incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation compared to spontaneously breathing technique in children and adolescents with temporomandibular joint ankylosis.

Trial registration: CTRI/2022/03/041362.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信