国际骨髓瘤协会/国际骨髓瘤工作组关于高危多发性骨髓瘤定义的共识建议。

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Faith E Davies, Mehmet K Samur, Jill Corre, Mattia D'Agostino, Martin F Kaiser, Marc S Raab, Niels Weinhold, Norma C Gutierrez, S Bruno Paiva, Paola Neri, Katja Weisel, Francesco Maura, Brian A Walker, Mark Bustoros, A Keith Stewart, Saad Z Usmani, Jens Hillengass, Wee Joo Chng, Jonathan J Keats, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez, Adam S Sperling, Cyrille Touzeau, Fenghuang Zhan, Noopur S Raje, Michele Cavo, Niccolò Bolli, Irene M Ghobrial, Madhav V Dhodapkar, Sundar Jagannath, Andrew Spencer, Samir Parekh, Nizar J Bahlis, Sagar Lonial, Pieter Sonneveld, Leif Bergsagel, Robert Z Orlowski, Gareth Morgan, María Victoria Mateos, S Vincent Rajkumar, Jesus F San Miguel, Kenneth C Anderson, Philippe Moreau, Shaji Kumar, Felipe Prósper, Nikhil C Munshi
{"title":"国际骨髓瘤协会/国际骨髓瘤工作组关于高危多发性骨髓瘤定义的共识建议。","authors":"Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Faith E Davies, Mehmet K Samur, Jill Corre, Mattia D'Agostino, Martin F Kaiser, Marc S Raab, Niels Weinhold, Norma C Gutierrez, S Bruno Paiva, Paola Neri, Katja Weisel, Francesco Maura, Brian A Walker, Mark Bustoros, A Keith Stewart, Saad Z Usmani, Jens Hillengass, Wee Joo Chng, Jonathan J Keats, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez, Adam S Sperling, Cyrille Touzeau, Fenghuang Zhan, Noopur S Raje, Michele Cavo, Niccolò Bolli, Irene M Ghobrial, Madhav V Dhodapkar, Sundar Jagannath, Andrew Spencer, Samir Parekh, Nizar J Bahlis, Sagar Lonial, Pieter Sonneveld, Leif Bergsagel, Robert Z Orlowski, Gareth Morgan, María Victoria Mateos, S Vincent Rajkumar, Jesus F San Miguel, Kenneth C Anderson, Philippe Moreau, Shaji Kumar, Felipe Prósper, Nikhil C Munshi","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-01893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite significant improvements in survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), outcomes remain heterogeneous, and a significant proportion of patients experience suboptimal outcomes. Importantly, traditional prognostic factors based on data from patients treated with older therapies no longer capture prognosis accurately in the contemporary era of novel triplet or quadruplet therapies. Therefore, risk stratification requires refinement in the context of available and investigational treatment options in routine practice and clinical trials, respectively. The current identification of high-risk MM (HRMM) in routine practice is based on the Revised International Staging System, which stratifies patients using a combination of widely available serum biomarkers and chromosomal abnormalities assessed via fluorescence in situ hybridization. In recent years, a substantial body of evidence concerning additional clinical, biological, and molecular/genomic prognostic factors has accumulated, along with new MM risk stratification tools and consensus reports. The International Myeloma Society, along with the International Myeloma Working Group, convened an Expert Panel with the primary aim of revisiting the definition of HRMM and formulating a practical and data-driven consensus definition, based on new evidence from molecular/genomic assays, updated clinical data, and contemporary risk stratification concepts. The Panel proposes the following Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS) of HRMM which relies upon the presence of at least one of these abnormalities: (1) del(17p), with a cutoff of >20% clonal fraction, and/or <i>TP53</i> mutation; (2) an IgH translocation including t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) along with 1q+ and/or del(1p32); (3) monoallelic del(1p32) along with 1q+ or biallelic del(1p32); or (4) β2 microglobulin ≥5.5 mg/L with normal creatinine (<1.2 mg/dL).</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2401893"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Myeloma Society/International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Recommendations on the Definition of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Faith E Davies, Mehmet K Samur, Jill Corre, Mattia D'Agostino, Martin F Kaiser, Marc S Raab, Niels Weinhold, Norma C Gutierrez, S Bruno Paiva, Paola Neri, Katja Weisel, Francesco Maura, Brian A Walker, Mark Bustoros, A Keith Stewart, Saad Z Usmani, Jens Hillengass, Wee Joo Chng, Jonathan J Keats, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez, Adam S Sperling, Cyrille Touzeau, Fenghuang Zhan, Noopur S Raje, Michele Cavo, Niccolò Bolli, Irene M Ghobrial, Madhav V Dhodapkar, Sundar Jagannath, Andrew Spencer, Samir Parekh, Nizar J Bahlis, Sagar Lonial, Pieter Sonneveld, Leif Bergsagel, Robert Z Orlowski, Gareth Morgan, María Victoria Mateos, S Vincent Rajkumar, Jesus F San Miguel, Kenneth C Anderson, Philippe Moreau, Shaji Kumar, Felipe Prósper, Nikhil C Munshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO-24-01893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite significant improvements in survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), outcomes remain heterogeneous, and a significant proportion of patients experience suboptimal outcomes. Importantly, traditional prognostic factors based on data from patients treated with older therapies no longer capture prognosis accurately in the contemporary era of novel triplet or quadruplet therapies. Therefore, risk stratification requires refinement in the context of available and investigational treatment options in routine practice and clinical trials, respectively. The current identification of high-risk MM (HRMM) in routine practice is based on the Revised International Staging System, which stratifies patients using a combination of widely available serum biomarkers and chromosomal abnormalities assessed via fluorescence in situ hybridization. In recent years, a substantial body of evidence concerning additional clinical, biological, and molecular/genomic prognostic factors has accumulated, along with new MM risk stratification tools and consensus reports. The International Myeloma Society, along with the International Myeloma Working Group, convened an Expert Panel with the primary aim of revisiting the definition of HRMM and formulating a practical and data-driven consensus definition, based on new evidence from molecular/genomic assays, updated clinical data, and contemporary risk stratification concepts. The Panel proposes the following Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS) of HRMM which relies upon the presence of at least one of these abnormalities: (1) del(17p), with a cutoff of >20% clonal fraction, and/or <i>TP53</i> mutation; (2) an IgH translocation including t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) along with 1q+ and/or del(1p32); (3) monoallelic del(1p32) along with 1q+ or biallelic del(1p32); or (4) β2 microglobulin ≥5.5 mg/L with normal creatinine (<1.2 mg/dL).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"JCO2401893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01893\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01893","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的生存率有显著改善,但结果仍然不均匀,很大一部分患者的预后不理想。重要的是,传统的预后因素基于接受旧疗法治疗的患者的数据,在新的三联或四联疗法的当代时代,不再准确地捕捉预后。因此,风险分层需要在常规实践和临床试验中分别对现有和研究性治疗方案进行细化。目前在常规实践中对高危MM (HRMM)的识别是基于修订的国际分期系统,该系统使用广泛可用的血清生物标志物和通过荧光原位杂交评估的染色体异常的组合对患者进行分层。近年来,关于其他临床、生物学和分子/基因组预后因素的大量证据已经积累,以及新的MM风险分层工具和共识报告。国际骨髓瘤协会和国际骨髓瘤工作组召集了一个专家小组,其主要目的是根据分子/基因组分析的新证据、最新的临床数据和当代风险分层概念,重新审视HRMM的定义,并制定一个实用的、数据驱动的共识定义。专家组提出了以下HRMM的共识基因组分期(CGS),该分期依赖于至少一种以下异常的存在:(1)del(17p),克隆分数的截断值为>20%,和/或TP53突变;(2) IgH易位,包括t(4;14)、t(14;16)或t(14;20)以及1q+和/或del(1p32);(3)单等位基因(1p32)和1q+或双等位基因(1p32);β2微球蛋白≥5.5 mg/L,肌酐正常(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Myeloma Society/International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Recommendations on the Definition of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.

Despite significant improvements in survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), outcomes remain heterogeneous, and a significant proportion of patients experience suboptimal outcomes. Importantly, traditional prognostic factors based on data from patients treated with older therapies no longer capture prognosis accurately in the contemporary era of novel triplet or quadruplet therapies. Therefore, risk stratification requires refinement in the context of available and investigational treatment options in routine practice and clinical trials, respectively. The current identification of high-risk MM (HRMM) in routine practice is based on the Revised International Staging System, which stratifies patients using a combination of widely available serum biomarkers and chromosomal abnormalities assessed via fluorescence in situ hybridization. In recent years, a substantial body of evidence concerning additional clinical, biological, and molecular/genomic prognostic factors has accumulated, along with new MM risk stratification tools and consensus reports. The International Myeloma Society, along with the International Myeloma Working Group, convened an Expert Panel with the primary aim of revisiting the definition of HRMM and formulating a practical and data-driven consensus definition, based on new evidence from molecular/genomic assays, updated clinical data, and contemporary risk stratification concepts. The Panel proposes the following Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS) of HRMM which relies upon the presence of at least one of these abnormalities: (1) del(17p), with a cutoff of >20% clonal fraction, and/or TP53 mutation; (2) an IgH translocation including t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) along with 1q+ and/or del(1p32); (3) monoallelic del(1p32) along with 1q+ or biallelic del(1p32); or (4) β2 microglobulin ≥5.5 mg/L with normal creatinine (<1.2 mg/dL).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信