{"title":"不再饿了吗?最低工资和劳动所得税抵免对粮食不安全的共同影响。","authors":"Otto Lenhart, Kalyan Chakraborty","doi":"10.1002/hec.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we provide evidence on the combined effect of state minimum wages and state Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) benefits on food insecurity. Using data from the Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement (CPS-FSS) between 2001 and 2019 and a sample of individuals with at most a High School degree, we estimate difference-in-differences models to examine whether the policies have a joint impact on food insecurity. Our study adds to a small number of papers evaluating potential interactions between state minimum wages and EITC laws. Our analysis reveals the presence of joint effects of the two programs in terms of reducing food insecurity. We find that a $1 increase in minimum wages reducing the likelihood of households experiencing very low food security by 6.0 percent in states with state EITC laws, with the effect being even larger (9.8 percent) in states with high EITC benefits. When examining a potential mechanism through which the two policies improve food security, we provide evidence for a joint impact on reducing poverty rates. In contrast, we find no evidence that minimum wages alone impact food insecurity or poverty rates in states without state EITC laws.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 9","pages":"1509-1517"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hec.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hungry no More? The Joint Impact of Minimum Wages and the Earned Income Tax Credit on Food Insecurity\",\"authors\":\"Otto Lenhart, Kalyan Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hec.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, we provide evidence on the combined effect of state minimum wages and state Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) benefits on food insecurity. Using data from the Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement (CPS-FSS) between 2001 and 2019 and a sample of individuals with at most a High School degree, we estimate difference-in-differences models to examine whether the policies have a joint impact on food insecurity. Our study adds to a small number of papers evaluating potential interactions between state minimum wages and EITC laws. Our analysis reveals the presence of joint effects of the two programs in terms of reducing food insecurity. We find that a $1 increase in minimum wages reducing the likelihood of households experiencing very low food security by 6.0 percent in states with state EITC laws, with the effect being even larger (9.8 percent) in states with high EITC benefits. When examining a potential mechanism through which the two policies improve food security, we provide evidence for a joint impact on reducing poverty rates. In contrast, we find no evidence that minimum wages alone impact food insecurity or poverty rates in states without state EITC laws.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"1509-1517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hec.70001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.70001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hungry no More? The Joint Impact of Minimum Wages and the Earned Income Tax Credit on Food Insecurity
In this study, we provide evidence on the combined effect of state minimum wages and state Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) benefits on food insecurity. Using data from the Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement (CPS-FSS) between 2001 and 2019 and a sample of individuals with at most a High School degree, we estimate difference-in-differences models to examine whether the policies have a joint impact on food insecurity. Our study adds to a small number of papers evaluating potential interactions between state minimum wages and EITC laws. Our analysis reveals the presence of joint effects of the two programs in terms of reducing food insecurity. We find that a $1 increase in minimum wages reducing the likelihood of households experiencing very low food security by 6.0 percent in states with state EITC laws, with the effect being even larger (9.8 percent) in states with high EITC benefits. When examining a potential mechanism through which the two policies improve food security, we provide evidence for a joint impact on reducing poverty rates. In contrast, we find no evidence that minimum wages alone impact food insecurity or poverty rates in states without state EITC laws.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.