术前胸椎旁阻滞对胸腔镜肺手术患者的体温保护有更大的好处:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yue Li, Weixin Zhang, Hansheng Liang, Liang Sun, Xinyue Gao, Yi Feng
{"title":"术前胸椎旁阻滞对胸腔镜肺手术患者的体温保护有更大的好处:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Yue Li, Weixin Zhang, Hansheng Liang, Liang Sun, Xinyue Gao, Yi Feng","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03164-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative hypothermia can lead to a variety of adverse events that hinder rapid recovery after surgery in clinical settings. General anesthesia combined with paravertebral block (PVB) may add additional heat loss and thus increase the incidence of hypothermia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery. However, gaps in the knowledge of the influence of the PVB time sequence on patients' body temperature remain. The aim of this study was to explore the potential impact of the time sequence of PVB on the risk of hypothermia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18-85 years who underwent thoracic PVB (TPVB) and thoracoscopic lung surgery at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. All the patients were divided into a pre-PVB group and a post-PVB group on the basis of the time sequence of PVB. The demographic, anesthesia-related and surgery-related data of the patients were collected. Propensity score matching was applied, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypothermia in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). The secondary outcomes included the occurrence of chill and delayed awakening, the numeric rating scale (NRS) score, extubation time and length of stay (LOS) in the PACU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1001 patients were enrolled, with 746 patients in the pre-PVB group and 255 patients in the post-PVB group. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 222 patients were included in each group. The results revealed that body temperature was significantly different between the two groups (pre-PVB group, 36.1 [36.0-36.2]°C; post-PVB group, 36.0 [36.0-36.2]°C; P = 0.012), and the incidence of hypothermia was greater in the post-PVB group than that in the pre-PVB group (24.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.047). The NRS scores in the PACU were higher in the pre-PVB group (0 [0-1] vs. 0 [0-0], P = 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference in the other outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative TPVB offers more benefits for body temperature protection in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery, but it slightly offsets the analgesic efficacy in the PACU.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative thoracic paravertebral block provides greater benefits for body temperature protection in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Li, Weixin Zhang, Hansheng Liang, Liang Sun, Xinyue Gao, Yi Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03164-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative hypothermia can lead to a variety of adverse events that hinder rapid recovery after surgery in clinical settings. General anesthesia combined with paravertebral block (PVB) may add additional heat loss and thus increase the incidence of hypothermia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery. However, gaps in the knowledge of the influence of the PVB time sequence on patients' body temperature remain. The aim of this study was to explore the potential impact of the time sequence of PVB on the risk of hypothermia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18-85 years who underwent thoracic PVB (TPVB) and thoracoscopic lung surgery at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. All the patients were divided into a pre-PVB group and a post-PVB group on the basis of the time sequence of PVB. The demographic, anesthesia-related and surgery-related data of the patients were collected. Propensity score matching was applied, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypothermia in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). The secondary outcomes included the occurrence of chill and delayed awakening, the numeric rating scale (NRS) score, extubation time and length of stay (LOS) in the PACU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1001 patients were enrolled, with 746 patients in the pre-PVB group and 255 patients in the post-PVB group. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 222 patients were included in each group. The results revealed that body temperature was significantly different between the two groups (pre-PVB group, 36.1 [36.0-36.2]°C; post-PVB group, 36.0 [36.0-36.2]°C; P = 0.012), and the incidence of hypothermia was greater in the post-PVB group than that in the pre-PVB group (24.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.047). The NRS scores in the PACU were higher in the pre-PVB group (0 [0-1] vs. 0 [0-0], P = 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference in the other outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative TPVB offers more benefits for body temperature protection in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery, but it slightly offsets the analgesic efficacy in the PACU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03164-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03164-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围手术期低温可导致各种不良事件,阻碍临床手术后的快速恢复。全麻联合椎旁阻滞(PVB)可能会增加额外的热损失,从而增加胸腔镜肺手术患者低体温的发生率。然而,PVB时间序列对患者体温的影响仍存在空白。本研究的目的是探讨PVB时间顺序对低温风险的潜在影响。方法:回顾性分析某三级医院18 ~ 85岁行胸腔镜肺手术的患者。根据PVB时间顺序将所有患者分为PVB前组和PVB后组。收集患者的人口学、麻醉相关和手术相关资料。采用倾向评分匹配,比较两组结果。主要结局是麻醉后护理病房(PACU)的低温发生率。次要结果包括寒战和延迟觉醒的发生、数值评定量表(NRS)评分、拔管时间和PACU住院时间(LOS)。结果:共纳入1001例患者,其中pvb前组746例,pvb后组255例。经1:1倾向评分匹配,每组222例。结果显示,两组大鼠体温差异显著(pvb前组,36.1[36.0-36.2]℃;pvb后组,36.0[36.0-36.2]℃;P = 0.012),且pvb后组低体温发生率高于pvb前组(24.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.047)。pvb前组PACU NRS评分较高(0[0-1]比0 [0-0],P = 0.041)。两组间其他结果无统计学差异。结论:术前TPVB对胸腔镜肺手术患者的体温保护作用更大,但对PACU的镇痛作用略有抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative thoracic paravertebral block provides greater benefits for body temperature protection in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Perioperative hypothermia can lead to a variety of adverse events that hinder rapid recovery after surgery in clinical settings. General anesthesia combined with paravertebral block (PVB) may add additional heat loss and thus increase the incidence of hypothermia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery. However, gaps in the knowledge of the influence of the PVB time sequence on patients' body temperature remain. The aim of this study was to explore the potential impact of the time sequence of PVB on the risk of hypothermia.

Methods: Patients aged 18-85 years who underwent thoracic PVB (TPVB) and thoracoscopic lung surgery at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. All the patients were divided into a pre-PVB group and a post-PVB group on the basis of the time sequence of PVB. The demographic, anesthesia-related and surgery-related data of the patients were collected. Propensity score matching was applied, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypothermia in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). The secondary outcomes included the occurrence of chill and delayed awakening, the numeric rating scale (NRS) score, extubation time and length of stay (LOS) in the PACU.

Results: A total of 1001 patients were enrolled, with 746 patients in the pre-PVB group and 255 patients in the post-PVB group. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 222 patients were included in each group. The results revealed that body temperature was significantly different between the two groups (pre-PVB group, 36.1 [36.0-36.2]°C; post-PVB group, 36.0 [36.0-36.2]°C; P = 0.012), and the incidence of hypothermia was greater in the post-PVB group than that in the pre-PVB group (24.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.047). The NRS scores in the PACU were higher in the pre-PVB group (0 [0-1] vs. 0 [0-0], P = 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference in the other outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusions: Preoperative TPVB offers more benefits for body temperature protection in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery, but it slightly offsets the analgesic efficacy in the PACU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信