自体细胞治疗、重复PTA和保守治疗在糖尿病和慢性肢体缺血性患者中的长期疗效。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
M Dubský, D Sojáková, J Husáková, A Němcová, V Fejfarová, R Jarošíková, V Frelichová, K Sutoris, E B Jude
{"title":"自体细胞治疗、重复PTA和保守治疗在糖尿病和慢性肢体缺血性患者中的长期疗效。","authors":"M Dubský, D Sojáková, J Husáková, A Němcová, V Fejfarová, R Jarošíková, V Frelichová, K Sutoris, E B Jude","doi":"10.1111/dom.16510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Data about long-term clinical outcomes of revascularization procedures, especially for autologous cell therapy (ACT), in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) are lacking. The aim of our study was to compare the mortality and amputation rates in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and CLTI treated by ACT with patients treated by repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (re-PTA) and those treated conservatively.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One-hundred and thirty patients with DFU and CLTI (defined as transcutaneous oxygen pressure-TcPO<sub>2</sub> <30 mmHg after unsuccessful standard revascularization) treated in our foot clinic over 9 years were enrolled in the study. Forty-five patients were treated by ACT, 43 patients underwent re-PTA, and 42 patients were treated conservatively and formed the control group. Overall survival, amputation-free survival (AFS) and major amputation rate were assessed over a 7-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities were similar between groups. However, patients in ACT and control groups had significantly worse baseline angiograms in accordance with Graziani and GLASS (infrapopliteal region) classifications than the re-PTA group (both p < 0.001), but there were no differences in baseline values of TcPO<sub>2</sub> between groups. AFS in the ACT and re-PTA groups were significantly longer compared to control (both p < 0.001). The rate of major amputation was significantly lower in both active groups (both p < 0.001). The re-PTA group showed significantly longer overall survival compared to the control group (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between ACT and control groups (p = 0.063) and ACT and re-PTA groups (p = 0.081) in this parameter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed significantly longer AFS and lower major amputation rates in patients treated by ACT and re-PTA in contrast to patients treated conservatively. Overall survival was significantly longer only in the re-PTA group. ACT was shown to be effective in long-term limb salvage in people with no-option CLTI.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term efficacy of autologous cell therapy, repeated PTA and conservative treatment in people with diabetes and chronic limb-threatening ischaemia.\",\"authors\":\"M Dubský, D Sojáková, J Husáková, A Němcová, V Fejfarová, R Jarošíková, V Frelichová, K Sutoris, E B Jude\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.16510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Data about long-term clinical outcomes of revascularization procedures, especially for autologous cell therapy (ACT), in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) are lacking. The aim of our study was to compare the mortality and amputation rates in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and CLTI treated by ACT with patients treated by repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (re-PTA) and those treated conservatively.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One-hundred and thirty patients with DFU and CLTI (defined as transcutaneous oxygen pressure-TcPO<sub>2</sub> <30 mmHg after unsuccessful standard revascularization) treated in our foot clinic over 9 years were enrolled in the study. Forty-five patients were treated by ACT, 43 patients underwent re-PTA, and 42 patients were treated conservatively and formed the control group. Overall survival, amputation-free survival (AFS) and major amputation rate were assessed over a 7-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities were similar between groups. However, patients in ACT and control groups had significantly worse baseline angiograms in accordance with Graziani and GLASS (infrapopliteal region) classifications than the re-PTA group (both p < 0.001), but there were no differences in baseline values of TcPO<sub>2</sub> between groups. AFS in the ACT and re-PTA groups were significantly longer compared to control (both p < 0.001). The rate of major amputation was significantly lower in both active groups (both p < 0.001). The re-PTA group showed significantly longer overall survival compared to the control group (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between ACT and control groups (p = 0.063) and ACT and re-PTA groups (p = 0.081) in this parameter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed significantly longer AFS and lower major amputation rates in patients treated by ACT and re-PTA in contrast to patients treated conservatively. Overall survival was significantly longer only in the re-PTA group. ACT was shown to be effective in long-term limb salvage in people with no-option CLTI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16510\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于糖尿病合并慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者的血运重建术,特别是自体细胞治疗(ACT)的长期临床结果的数据缺乏。本研究的目的是比较ACT治疗的糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)和CLTI患者与重复经皮腔内血管成形术(re-PTA)和保守治疗的患者的死亡率和截肢率。材料和方法:130例DFU和CLTI患者(定义为经皮氧压- tcpo2)结果:组间基线人口统计学特征和合并症相似。然而,ACT组和对照组患者根据Graziani和GLASS(腘下区)分类的基线血管造影明显差于re-PTA组(两组间均为2)。结论:我们的研究显示,与保守治疗的患者相比,ACT和re-PTA治疗的患者AFS明显更长,大截肢率更低。只有re-PTA组的总生存期明显更长。ACT被证明对无选择CLTI患者的长期肢体保留是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term efficacy of autologous cell therapy, repeated PTA and conservative treatment in people with diabetes and chronic limb-threatening ischaemia.

Aims: Data about long-term clinical outcomes of revascularization procedures, especially for autologous cell therapy (ACT), in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) are lacking. The aim of our study was to compare the mortality and amputation rates in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and CLTI treated by ACT with patients treated by repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (re-PTA) and those treated conservatively.

Materials and methods: One-hundred and thirty patients with DFU and CLTI (defined as transcutaneous oxygen pressure-TcPO2 <30 mmHg after unsuccessful standard revascularization) treated in our foot clinic over 9 years were enrolled in the study. Forty-five patients were treated by ACT, 43 patients underwent re-PTA, and 42 patients were treated conservatively and formed the control group. Overall survival, amputation-free survival (AFS) and major amputation rate were assessed over a 7-year follow-up period.

Results: Baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities were similar between groups. However, patients in ACT and control groups had significantly worse baseline angiograms in accordance with Graziani and GLASS (infrapopliteal region) classifications than the re-PTA group (both p < 0.001), but there were no differences in baseline values of TcPO2 between groups. AFS in the ACT and re-PTA groups were significantly longer compared to control (both p < 0.001). The rate of major amputation was significantly lower in both active groups (both p < 0.001). The re-PTA group showed significantly longer overall survival compared to the control group (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between ACT and control groups (p = 0.063) and ACT and re-PTA groups (p = 0.081) in this parameter.

Conclusions: Our study showed significantly longer AFS and lower major amputation rates in patients treated by ACT and re-PTA in contrast to patients treated conservatively. Overall survival was significantly longer only in the re-PTA group. ACT was shown to be effective in long-term limb salvage in people with no-option CLTI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信