{"title":"连接学生的知识基金与科学话语:对塑造教师教学变革能动性意识的组织背景的考察","authors":"Erin Hogan, Christine Bae","doi":"10.1002/sce.21941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study, which is part of the special issue on Teacher Learning and Practice in Organizational Contexts, investigated the ways in which urban middle school science teachers' organizational contexts influenced their ability to identify and leverage minoritized students' funds of knowledge (FoK) to facilitate equitable science learning through hybrid discourse. Ten science teachers received professional development from an external, university partner and ongoing professional learning as part of lesson study. We used a multiple case study methodology and applied the Instructional Capacity Framework and the concept of teacher agency to analyze lesson study artifacts (classroom videos, lesson plans, and TeachFX reports) and interviews where teachers described their perspectives on organizational barriers and facilitators to the implementation of hybrid discourse. Findings demonstrate how individual, organizational, and external factors interacted to produce differences in teams' approaches to hybrid discourse and the individual and collective agency they held for engaging in this work. To all teams, teacher agency was needed to challenge organizational culture and schooling norms that historically did not value minoritized students' FoK or opportunities to construct scientific understandings. External policies, especially high-stakes tests, reified this culture, which was, in turn, internalized by teachers and students as actors within the organization. These interacted with teachers' dispositions (e.g., critical reflexivity and perspectives on the value of students' FoK) as well as capacities within their organization generated via lesson study to influence the degree to which teachers exerted agency to implement hybrid discourse. We close by discussing implications for future teacher learning experiences aligned to equitable science instruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"109 4","pages":"1090-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Student Funds of Knowledge With Science Discourse: An Examination of the Organizational Context That Shaped Teachers' Sense of Agency for Instructional Change\",\"authors\":\"Erin Hogan, Christine Bae\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sce.21941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study, which is part of the special issue on Teacher Learning and Practice in Organizational Contexts, investigated the ways in which urban middle school science teachers' organizational contexts influenced their ability to identify and leverage minoritized students' funds of knowledge (FoK) to facilitate equitable science learning through hybrid discourse. Ten science teachers received professional development from an external, university partner and ongoing professional learning as part of lesson study. We used a multiple case study methodology and applied the Instructional Capacity Framework and the concept of teacher agency to analyze lesson study artifacts (classroom videos, lesson plans, and TeachFX reports) and interviews where teachers described their perspectives on organizational barriers and facilitators to the implementation of hybrid discourse. Findings demonstrate how individual, organizational, and external factors interacted to produce differences in teams' approaches to hybrid discourse and the individual and collective agency they held for engaging in this work. To all teams, teacher agency was needed to challenge organizational culture and schooling norms that historically did not value minoritized students' FoK or opportunities to construct scientific understandings. External policies, especially high-stakes tests, reified this culture, which was, in turn, internalized by teachers and students as actors within the organization. These interacted with teachers' dispositions (e.g., critical reflexivity and perspectives on the value of students' FoK) as well as capacities within their organization generated via lesson study to influence the degree to which teachers exerted agency to implement hybrid discourse. We close by discussing implications for future teacher learning experiences aligned to equitable science instruction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"109 4\",\"pages\":\"1090-1113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21941\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21941","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bridging Student Funds of Knowledge With Science Discourse: An Examination of the Organizational Context That Shaped Teachers' Sense of Agency for Instructional Change
This study, which is part of the special issue on Teacher Learning and Practice in Organizational Contexts, investigated the ways in which urban middle school science teachers' organizational contexts influenced their ability to identify and leverage minoritized students' funds of knowledge (FoK) to facilitate equitable science learning through hybrid discourse. Ten science teachers received professional development from an external, university partner and ongoing professional learning as part of lesson study. We used a multiple case study methodology and applied the Instructional Capacity Framework and the concept of teacher agency to analyze lesson study artifacts (classroom videos, lesson plans, and TeachFX reports) and interviews where teachers described their perspectives on organizational barriers and facilitators to the implementation of hybrid discourse. Findings demonstrate how individual, organizational, and external factors interacted to produce differences in teams' approaches to hybrid discourse and the individual and collective agency they held for engaging in this work. To all teams, teacher agency was needed to challenge organizational culture and schooling norms that historically did not value minoritized students' FoK or opportunities to construct scientific understandings. External policies, especially high-stakes tests, reified this culture, which was, in turn, internalized by teachers and students as actors within the organization. These interacted with teachers' dispositions (e.g., critical reflexivity and perspectives on the value of students' FoK) as well as capacities within their organization generated via lesson study to influence the degree to which teachers exerted agency to implement hybrid discourse. We close by discussing implications for future teacher learning experiences aligned to equitable science instruction.
期刊介绍:
Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]