长期护理中药剂师主导的降压药处方的障碍和促进因素:一项基于调查的研究

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ana Vucenovic, Roni Y. Kraut, Donna P. Manca, Cheryl A. Sadowski
{"title":"长期护理中药剂师主导的降压药处方的障碍和促进因素:一项基于调查的研究","authors":"Ana Vucenovic,&nbsp;Roni Y. Kraut,&nbsp;Donna P. Manca,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Sadowski","doi":"10.1111/bcpt.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pharmacist-led deprescribing is an approach of addressing polypharmacy in the long-term care (LTC) setting. However, the sustainability of this practice has not been widely studied. This study describes facilitators and barriers to pharmacist-led deprescribing from pre- and post-surveys completed as part of a randomized controlled antihypertensive deprescribing trial in Alberta, Canada. The surveys, targeting facilitators and barriers to deprescribing, were developed based on current evidence and designed through an iterative process with pharmacist input and consist of open- and closed-ended questions. Nine pharmacists completed both surveys (seven female; five have been a pharmacist ≥10 years; and eight had their Additional Prescribing Authority [authority to prescribe to full scope of practice]). The key facilitators were (1) pharmacist confidence and attitude toward deprescribing, (2) sufficient patient data, and (3) minimal tools and education required. The key barriers included (1) pharmacist perception of not being the primary decision maker on prescribing decisions, (2) insufficient support from residents' families and physicians, and (3) additional time required. These facilitators and barriers were all identified pre-deprescribing, and confirmed, and more evident post-deprescribing. These barriers will make it challenging for pharmacists to incorporate deprescribing antihypertensives into routine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8733,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators to Pharmacist-Led Deprescribing of Antihypertensives in Long-Term Care: A Survey-Based Study\",\"authors\":\"Ana Vucenovic,&nbsp;Roni Y. Kraut,&nbsp;Donna P. Manca,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Sadowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcpt.70060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Pharmacist-led deprescribing is an approach of addressing polypharmacy in the long-term care (LTC) setting. However, the sustainability of this practice has not been widely studied. This study describes facilitators and barriers to pharmacist-led deprescribing from pre- and post-surveys completed as part of a randomized controlled antihypertensive deprescribing trial in Alberta, Canada. The surveys, targeting facilitators and barriers to deprescribing, were developed based on current evidence and designed through an iterative process with pharmacist input and consist of open- and closed-ended questions. Nine pharmacists completed both surveys (seven female; five have been a pharmacist ≥10 years; and eight had their Additional Prescribing Authority [authority to prescribe to full scope of practice]). The key facilitators were (1) pharmacist confidence and attitude toward deprescribing, (2) sufficient patient data, and (3) minimal tools and education required. The key barriers included (1) pharmacist perception of not being the primary decision maker on prescribing decisions, (2) insufficient support from residents' families and physicians, and (3) additional time required. These facilitators and barriers were all identified pre-deprescribing, and confirmed, and more evident post-deprescribing. These barriers will make it challenging for pharmacists to incorporate deprescribing antihypertensives into routine care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.70060\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药剂师主导的开处方是解决长期护理(LTC)环境中多重用药的一种方法。然而,这种做法的可持续性尚未得到广泛研究。本研究描述了在加拿大阿尔伯塔省一项随机对照降压处方试验中完成的调查前后,药剂师主导的降压处方的促进因素和障碍。这些调查的目标是处方的促进因素和障碍,是根据现有证据开发的,通过药剂师输入的迭代过程设计的,包括开放式和封闭式问题。9名药剂师完成了两项调查(7名女性;5人从事药师工作≥10年;其中8家拥有额外的开处方权限(在完全执业范围内开处方的权限)。关键的促进因素是(1)药剂师对处方的信心和态度,(2)充足的患者数据,(3)所需的工具和教育最少。主要障碍包括:(1)药剂师认为自己不是处方决策的主要决策者;(2)居民家庭和医生的支持不足;(3)需要额外的时间。这些促进因素和障碍都在开处方前被确定,并在开处方后得到证实,而且更加明显。这些障碍将使药剂师在常规护理中纳入降压药处方具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and Facilitators to Pharmacist-Led Deprescribing of Antihypertensives in Long-Term Care: A Survey-Based Study

Pharmacist-led deprescribing is an approach of addressing polypharmacy in the long-term care (LTC) setting. However, the sustainability of this practice has not been widely studied. This study describes facilitators and barriers to pharmacist-led deprescribing from pre- and post-surveys completed as part of a randomized controlled antihypertensive deprescribing trial in Alberta, Canada. The surveys, targeting facilitators and barriers to deprescribing, were developed based on current evidence and designed through an iterative process with pharmacist input and consist of open- and closed-ended questions. Nine pharmacists completed both surveys (seven female; five have been a pharmacist ≥10 years; and eight had their Additional Prescribing Authority [authority to prescribe to full scope of practice]). The key facilitators were (1) pharmacist confidence and attitude toward deprescribing, (2) sufficient patient data, and (3) minimal tools and education required. The key barriers included (1) pharmacist perception of not being the primary decision maker on prescribing decisions, (2) insufficient support from residents' families and physicians, and (3) additional time required. These facilitators and barriers were all identified pre-deprescribing, and confirmed, and more evident post-deprescribing. These barriers will make it challenging for pharmacists to incorporate deprescribing antihypertensives into routine care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology is an independent journal, publishing original scientific research in all fields of toxicology, basic and clinical pharmacology. This includes experimental animal pharmacology and toxicology and molecular (-genetic), biochemical and cellular pharmacology and toxicology. It also includes all aspects of clinical pharmacology: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug/drug interactions, pharmacogenetics/-genomics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoeconomics, randomized controlled clinical trials and rational pharmacotherapy. For all compounds used in the studies, the chemical constitution and composition should be known, also for natural compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信