从定量批评的角度看隔离的暴露/隔离措施:对教育研究的影响

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Vandeen A Campbell , Darnell Leatherwood
{"title":"从定量批评的角度看隔离的暴露/隔离措施:对教育研究的影响","authors":"Vandeen A Campbell ,&nbsp;Darnell Leatherwood","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We briefly reflect on a current study that examined how exposure measures of segregation relate to access to an accelerated math pathway in which we proposed, using a QuantCrit lens, that exposure/isolation measures can function as proxies for shedding light on how structural and systemic racism influence the distribution of important educational resources. We refine our initial conceptualization by applying that lens to proposed models in Reardon and Owens's 2014 review of segregation research and demonstrate that exposure/isolation measures within the proposed modeling framework can illuminate mechanisms of systemic racism in resource allocation. Although it can be argued that these measures are established and useful, we caution against using them uncritically. Understanding these mechanisms can help policymakers, practitioners, advocates, and others design more effective strategies to address educational inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101543"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposure/isolation measures of segregation through a QuantCrit lens: implications for education research\",\"authors\":\"Vandeen A Campbell ,&nbsp;Darnell Leatherwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We briefly reflect on a current study that examined how exposure measures of segregation relate to access to an accelerated math pathway in which we proposed, using a QuantCrit lens, that exposure/isolation measures can function as proxies for shedding light on how structural and systemic racism influence the distribution of important educational resources. We refine our initial conceptualization by applying that lens to proposed models in Reardon and Owens's 2014 review of segregation research and demonstrate that exposure/isolation measures within the proposed modeling framework can illuminate mechanisms of systemic racism in resource allocation. Although it can be argued that these measures are established and useful, we caution against using them uncritically. Understanding these mechanisms can help policymakers, practitioners, advocates, and others design more effective strategies to address educational inequalities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625000622\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625000622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们简要地回顾了当前的一项研究,该研究考察了隔离的暴露措施与获得加速数学途径的关系,在该研究中,我们使用QuantCrit镜头提出,暴露/隔离措施可以作为揭示结构性和系统性种族主义如何影响重要教育资源分配的代理。我们通过将这一视角应用于Reardon和Owens在2014年对种族隔离研究的回顾中提出的模型,完善了我们最初的概念,并证明了在提出的建模框架内的暴露/隔离措施可以阐明资源分配中系统性种族主义的机制。虽然可以认为这些措施是建立和有用的,但我们警告不要不加批判地使用它们。了解这些机制可以帮助决策者、从业者、倡导者和其他人设计更有效的策略来解决教育不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exposure/isolation measures of segregation through a QuantCrit lens: implications for education research
We briefly reflect on a current study that examined how exposure measures of segregation relate to access to an accelerated math pathway in which we proposed, using a QuantCrit lens, that exposure/isolation measures can function as proxies for shedding light on how structural and systemic racism influence the distribution of important educational resources. We refine our initial conceptualization by applying that lens to proposed models in Reardon and Owens's 2014 review of segregation research and demonstrate that exposure/isolation measures within the proposed modeling framework can illuminate mechanisms of systemic racism in resource allocation. Although it can be argued that these measures are established and useful, we caution against using them uncritically. Understanding these mechanisms can help policymakers, practitioners, advocates, and others design more effective strategies to address educational inequalities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信