识别和缩小头颈癌手术的信息差距

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sabrina R Comess BA , Justin K Joseph BA , Michelle Yoon BA , Salmaan Sayeed BS , Pranati Borkhetaria BA , Luke Stanisce MD , Margaret Brandwein-Weber MD , Michael Karasick PhD , Mark L Urken MD
{"title":"识别和缩小头颈癌手术的信息差距","authors":"Sabrina R Comess BA ,&nbsp;Justin K Joseph BA ,&nbsp;Michelle Yoon BA ,&nbsp;Salmaan Sayeed BS ,&nbsp;Pranati Borkhetaria BA ,&nbsp;Luke Stanisce MD ,&nbsp;Margaret Brandwein-Weber MD ,&nbsp;Michael Karasick PhD ,&nbsp;Mark L Urken MD","doi":"10.1016/j.seminoncol.2025.152362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contemporary cancer management relies on the precise transfer of information regarding disease and treatment details between a range of providers and facilities. The time of surgery is uniquely responsible for many ambiguities in this oncological information flow, as intraoperative communication and documentation are often unregimented and imprecise. Downstream providers such as radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and radiologists rely on surgical pathology reports for planning postoperative treatment and surveillance. However, traditional pathology reports lack critical details about the actions taken during surgery and do not make the oncologic clearance status explicit. We identified agents of change to improve information transfer and designed an improved surgical workflow and pathology report that make use of a novel pathologic reporting software to address gaps in the oncologic care timeline. Our updated workflow results in a dynamic final pathology report that integrates annotated 3D scans of the surgical specimen and extirpative defect, unequivocal reconciliation of at-risk and supplemental margins, highlighted preoperative radiographs, and brief narrative summaries by the surgeon and pathologist. These tangible changes aim to improve clarity and continuity in oncologic care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":"52 4","pages":"Article 152362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying and closing information gaps in head and neck cancer surgery\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina R Comess BA ,&nbsp;Justin K Joseph BA ,&nbsp;Michelle Yoon BA ,&nbsp;Salmaan Sayeed BS ,&nbsp;Pranati Borkhetaria BA ,&nbsp;Luke Stanisce MD ,&nbsp;Margaret Brandwein-Weber MD ,&nbsp;Michael Karasick PhD ,&nbsp;Mark L Urken MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seminoncol.2025.152362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Contemporary cancer management relies on the precise transfer of information regarding disease and treatment details between a range of providers and facilities. The time of surgery is uniquely responsible for many ambiguities in this oncological information flow, as intraoperative communication and documentation are often unregimented and imprecise. Downstream providers such as radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and radiologists rely on surgical pathology reports for planning postoperative treatment and surveillance. However, traditional pathology reports lack critical details about the actions taken during surgery and do not make the oncologic clearance status explicit. We identified agents of change to improve information transfer and designed an improved surgical workflow and pathology report that make use of a novel pathologic reporting software to address gaps in the oncologic care timeline. Our updated workflow results in a dynamic final pathology report that integrates annotated 3D scans of the surgical specimen and extirpative defect, unequivocal reconciliation of at-risk and supplemental margins, highlighted preoperative radiographs, and brief narrative summaries by the surgeon and pathologist. These tangible changes aim to improve clarity and continuity in oncologic care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 152362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775425000545\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775425000545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代癌症管理依赖于在一系列提供者和设施之间准确传递有关疾病和治疗细节的信息。手术时间是造成肿瘤信息流中许多不明确的唯一原因,因为术中沟通和记录往往不规范和不精确。下游提供者,如放射肿瘤学家、内科肿瘤学家和放射科医生依靠手术病理报告来规划术后治疗和监测。然而,传统的病理报告缺乏手术过程中所采取行动的关键细节,也没有明确肿瘤清除状态。我们确定了改变的因素,以改善信息传递,并设计了改进的手术工作流程和病理报告,利用一种新的病理报告软件来解决肿瘤治疗时间表上的差距。我们更新的工作流程产生了一份动态的最终病理报告,该报告集成了手术标本和切除缺陷的注释3D扫描,风险和补充边缘的明确协调,突出显示的术前x光片以及外科医生和病理学家的简短叙述总结。这些切实的变化旨在提高肿瘤护理的清晰度和连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying and closing information gaps in head and neck cancer surgery
Contemporary cancer management relies on the precise transfer of information regarding disease and treatment details between a range of providers and facilities. The time of surgery is uniquely responsible for many ambiguities in this oncological information flow, as intraoperative communication and documentation are often unregimented and imprecise. Downstream providers such as radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and radiologists rely on surgical pathology reports for planning postoperative treatment and surveillance. However, traditional pathology reports lack critical details about the actions taken during surgery and do not make the oncologic clearance status explicit. We identified agents of change to improve information transfer and designed an improved surgical workflow and pathology report that make use of a novel pathologic reporting software to address gaps in the oncologic care timeline. Our updated workflow results in a dynamic final pathology report that integrates annotated 3D scans of the surgical specimen and extirpative defect, unequivocal reconciliation of at-risk and supplemental margins, highlighted preoperative radiographs, and brief narrative summaries by the surgeon and pathologist. These tangible changes aim to improve clarity and continuity in oncologic care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信