Zhidian Zhang , Chenxi Ou , Yehlin Cho , Yo Akiyama , Sergey Ovchinnikov
{"title":"蛋白质折叠与设计的人工智能方法","authors":"Zhidian Zhang , Chenxi Ou , Yehlin Cho , Yo Akiyama , Sergey Ovchinnikov","doi":"10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Machine learning has revolutionized protein structure prediction and design. This review discusses current methods for protein folding and inverse folding challenges. Models like AlphaFold2 (AF2), RoseTTAFold, and ESMFold excel at leveraging evolutionary information to accurately predict protein structures while still struggling to capture the physics of protein folding. Their repurposing for protein design has led to innovations such as RFdiffusion, AF2-design, and relaxed sequence optimization. ProteinMPNN and ESM-IF design sequences based on structure, so they are frequently referred to as “inverse folding’ methods. By examining the potential and limitations of current protein design methods and metrics, we provide perspectives on developing models that fully characterize energy landscapes associated with amino acid sequences. Such advances would enable more accurate structure prediction and the design of proteins with specified conformational dynamics, potentially transforming our ability to engineer novel proteins for biotechnological applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10887,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in structural biology","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 103066"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence methods for protein folding and design\",\"authors\":\"Zhidian Zhang , Chenxi Ou , Yehlin Cho , Yo Akiyama , Sergey Ovchinnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Machine learning has revolutionized protein structure prediction and design. This review discusses current methods for protein folding and inverse folding challenges. Models like AlphaFold2 (AF2), RoseTTAFold, and ESMFold excel at leveraging evolutionary information to accurately predict protein structures while still struggling to capture the physics of protein folding. Their repurposing for protein design has led to innovations such as RFdiffusion, AF2-design, and relaxed sequence optimization. ProteinMPNN and ESM-IF design sequences based on structure, so they are frequently referred to as “inverse folding’ methods. By examining the potential and limitations of current protein design methods and metrics, we provide perspectives on developing models that fully characterize energy landscapes associated with amino acid sequences. Such advances would enable more accurate structure prediction and the design of proteins with specified conformational dynamics, potentially transforming our ability to engineer novel proteins for biotechnological applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in structural biology\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in structural biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X25000843\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X25000843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence methods for protein folding and design
Machine learning has revolutionized protein structure prediction and design. This review discusses current methods for protein folding and inverse folding challenges. Models like AlphaFold2 (AF2), RoseTTAFold, and ESMFold excel at leveraging evolutionary information to accurately predict protein structures while still struggling to capture the physics of protein folding. Their repurposing for protein design has led to innovations such as RFdiffusion, AF2-design, and relaxed sequence optimization. ProteinMPNN and ESM-IF design sequences based on structure, so they are frequently referred to as “inverse folding’ methods. By examining the potential and limitations of current protein design methods and metrics, we provide perspectives on developing models that fully characterize energy landscapes associated with amino acid sequences. Such advances would enable more accurate structure prediction and the design of proteins with specified conformational dynamics, potentially transforming our ability to engineer novel proteins for biotechnological applications.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Structural Biology (COSB) aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed.
In COSB, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner:
1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form.
2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications.
[...]
The subject of Structural Biology is divided into twelve themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year. Each issue contains two sections, and the amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance.
-Folding and Binding-
Nucleic acids and their protein complexes-
Macromolecular Machines-
Theory and Simulation-
Sequences and Topology-
New constructs and expression of proteins-
Membranes-
Engineering and Design-
Carbohydrate-protein interactions and glycosylation-
Biophysical and molecular biological methods-
Multi-protein assemblies in signalling-
Catalysis and Regulation