{"title":"x线片上股骨近端物理参数定位的内部和内部可靠度分析比较","authors":"Varun Garg , Anil Agarwal , Kishmita Sachdeva , K.S. Ankitha","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The orientation of proximal femur physis is important as it can cause 3-dimensional deformity of the proximal femur. Recently, authors have described various parameters to describe the orientation of proximal femur physis. Therefore, we aim to compare the intra and interobserver reliability of these parameters in this study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Radiographs of the bilateral hip with the pelvis of children between 1 and 10 years of age were retrieved from the hospital archives to measure the Physeal orientation angle (PO), Physeal tilt angle (PTA), Head shaft angle (HSA), and Alsberg angle (AA). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha respectively by three independent observers at two separate times, two weeks apart.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total analysis included 179 radiographs, including 378 hips. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had values ranging from 9.57<sup>0</sup> -14.04<sup>0</sup>, 19.62°-25.04<sup>0</sup>, 58.75°-65.82<sup>0</sup>, and 24.47<sup>0</sup> -31.79<sup>0</sup>, respectively, for the six data sets (three observers at two different times).The intra-observer reliability of PO, PTA, HSA, and AA ranged from 0.59- 0.72, 0.9–0.95, 0.91–0.95 and 0.86–0.95 respectively. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had inter-observer reliability values between 0.79 -0.82, 0.88–0.92, 0.85–0.88, and 0.89–0.92, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study found that PTA, AA, and HSA have shown good reliability, but they may not accurately represent the true orientation of the capital femoral physis with respect to the femoral neck. For routine follow-up, PO may be a suitable alternative. However, it is not as reliable as other parameters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 103093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of intra-and interobserver reliability analysis of orientation proximal femur physis parameters on radiographs\",\"authors\":\"Varun Garg , Anil Agarwal , Kishmita Sachdeva , K.S. Ankitha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The orientation of proximal femur physis is important as it can cause 3-dimensional deformity of the proximal femur. Recently, authors have described various parameters to describe the orientation of proximal femur physis. Therefore, we aim to compare the intra and interobserver reliability of these parameters in this study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Radiographs of the bilateral hip with the pelvis of children between 1 and 10 years of age were retrieved from the hospital archives to measure the Physeal orientation angle (PO), Physeal tilt angle (PTA), Head shaft angle (HSA), and Alsberg angle (AA). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha respectively by three independent observers at two separate times, two weeks apart.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total analysis included 179 radiographs, including 378 hips. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had values ranging from 9.57<sup>0</sup> -14.04<sup>0</sup>, 19.62°-25.04<sup>0</sup>, 58.75°-65.82<sup>0</sup>, and 24.47<sup>0</sup> -31.79<sup>0</sup>, respectively, for the six data sets (three observers at two different times).The intra-observer reliability of PO, PTA, HSA, and AA ranged from 0.59- 0.72, 0.9–0.95, 0.91–0.95 and 0.86–0.95 respectively. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had inter-observer reliability values between 0.79 -0.82, 0.88–0.92, 0.85–0.88, and 0.89–0.92, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study found that PTA, AA, and HSA have shown good reliability, but they may not accurately represent the true orientation of the capital femoral physis with respect to the femoral neck. For routine follow-up, PO may be a suitable alternative. However, it is not as reliable as other parameters.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of intra-and interobserver reliability analysis of orientation proximal femur physis parameters on radiographs
Background
The orientation of proximal femur physis is important as it can cause 3-dimensional deformity of the proximal femur. Recently, authors have described various parameters to describe the orientation of proximal femur physis. Therefore, we aim to compare the intra and interobserver reliability of these parameters in this study.
Methods
Radiographs of the bilateral hip with the pelvis of children between 1 and 10 years of age were retrieved from the hospital archives to measure the Physeal orientation angle (PO), Physeal tilt angle (PTA), Head shaft angle (HSA), and Alsberg angle (AA). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha respectively by three independent observers at two separate times, two weeks apart.
Results
The total analysis included 179 radiographs, including 378 hips. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had values ranging from 9.570 -14.040, 19.62°-25.040, 58.75°-65.820, and 24.470 -31.790, respectively, for the six data sets (three observers at two different times).The intra-observer reliability of PO, PTA, HSA, and AA ranged from 0.59- 0.72, 0.9–0.95, 0.91–0.95 and 0.86–0.95 respectively. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had inter-observer reliability values between 0.79 -0.82, 0.88–0.92, 0.85–0.88, and 0.89–0.92, respectively.
Conclusion
The study found that PTA, AA, and HSA have shown good reliability, but they may not accurately represent the true orientation of the capital femoral physis with respect to the femoral neck. For routine follow-up, PO may be a suitable alternative. However, it is not as reliable as other parameters.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.