为什么生物标志物引导的脓毒症液体复苏没有在临床实践中实施?

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001274
Sanne Ter Horst, Jan C Ter Maaten, Matijs van Meurs, Jill Moser, Hjalmar R Bouma
{"title":"为什么生物标志物引导的脓毒症液体复苏没有在临床实践中实施?","authors":"Sanne Ter Horst, Jan C Ter Maaten, Matijs van Meurs, Jill Moser, Hjalmar R Bouma","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis is a dysregulated, potentially fatal host response to infection, characterized by heterogeneity in clinical presentation and organ failure mechanisms. Early hemodynamic resuscitation and antibiotics are crucial treatments. Current guidelines recommend a one-size-fits-all approach of 30 mL/kg fluids, which may worsen vascular leakage and organ dysfunction in some patients. Personalized strategies using biomarkers and dynamic fluid responsiveness assessments offer a more tailored approach, potentially preventing fluid overload while ensuring perfusion. A recent multiomics analysis identified sepsis subgroups benefiting from either liberal or restrictive fluid resuscitation, highlighting -omics' potential in personalized fluid management and the role of immune regulation and endothelial dysfunction in septic shock. Despite progress, methodological challenges hinder clinical implementation of biomarkers. Addressing issues like rapid point-of-care biomarker assays already at emergency department or ICU admission, standardizing sepsis diagnosis, robust external validation, and clinical trial enrichment is crucial for advancing biomarker-guided fluid management in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 6","pages":"e1274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Has Biomarker-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Sepsis Not Been Implemented in Clinical Practice?\",\"authors\":\"Sanne Ter Horst, Jan C Ter Maaten, Matijs van Meurs, Jill Moser, Hjalmar R Bouma\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sepsis is a dysregulated, potentially fatal host response to infection, characterized by heterogeneity in clinical presentation and organ failure mechanisms. Early hemodynamic resuscitation and antibiotics are crucial treatments. Current guidelines recommend a one-size-fits-all approach of 30 mL/kg fluids, which may worsen vascular leakage and organ dysfunction in some patients. Personalized strategies using biomarkers and dynamic fluid responsiveness assessments offer a more tailored approach, potentially preventing fluid overload while ensuring perfusion. A recent multiomics analysis identified sepsis subgroups benefiting from either liberal or restrictive fluid resuscitation, highlighting -omics' potential in personalized fluid management and the role of immune regulation and endothelial dysfunction in septic shock. Despite progress, methodological challenges hinder clinical implementation of biomarkers. Addressing issues like rapid point-of-care biomarker assays already at emergency department or ICU admission, standardizing sepsis diagnosis, robust external validation, and clinical trial enrichment is crucial for advancing biomarker-guided fluid management in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"e1274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症是一种失调的、可能致命的宿主对感染的反应,其特点是临床表现和器官衰竭机制的异质性。早期血液动力学复苏和抗生素是关键的治疗方法。目前的指南建议采用30ml /kg液体的一刀切方法,这可能会加重一些患者的血管渗漏和器官功能障碍。使用生物标志物和动态流体反应性评估的个性化策略提供了更有针对性的方法,在确保灌注的同时可能防止流体过载。最近的一项多组学分析确定了脓毒症亚组受益于自由或限制性液体复苏,强调了组学在个性化液体管理以及免疫调节和内皮功能障碍在脓毒症休克中的作用方面的潜力。尽管取得了进展,但方法学上的挑战阻碍了生物标志物的临床应用。解决诸如急诊科或ICU入院时的快速即时生物标志物检测、标准化败血症诊断、可靠的外部验证和丰富临床试验等问题,对于在临床环境中推进生物标志物引导的流体管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Has Biomarker-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Sepsis Not Been Implemented in Clinical Practice?

Sepsis is a dysregulated, potentially fatal host response to infection, characterized by heterogeneity in clinical presentation and organ failure mechanisms. Early hemodynamic resuscitation and antibiotics are crucial treatments. Current guidelines recommend a one-size-fits-all approach of 30 mL/kg fluids, which may worsen vascular leakage and organ dysfunction in some patients. Personalized strategies using biomarkers and dynamic fluid responsiveness assessments offer a more tailored approach, potentially preventing fluid overload while ensuring perfusion. A recent multiomics analysis identified sepsis subgroups benefiting from either liberal or restrictive fluid resuscitation, highlighting -omics' potential in personalized fluid management and the role of immune regulation and endothelial dysfunction in septic shock. Despite progress, methodological challenges hinder clinical implementation of biomarkers. Addressing issues like rapid point-of-care biomarker assays already at emergency department or ICU admission, standardizing sepsis diagnosis, robust external validation, and clinical trial enrichment is crucial for advancing biomarker-guided fluid management in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信