关节镜下关节盂骨丢失<25的骨Bankart病变修复中,早期手术稳定是积极预测因素,而主肢受损伤和偏离轨道病变是消极预测因素。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Muhammed Furkan Tosun, Ethem Burak Oklaz, Asim Ahmadov, Cem Ismail Gungor, Mehmet Ali Tokgoz, Ibrahim Kaya, Mustafa Melik Can, Ulunay Kanatli
{"title":"关节镜下关节盂骨丢失<25的骨Bankart病变修复中,早期手术稳定是积极预测因素,而主肢受损伤和偏离轨道病变是消极预测因素。","authors":"Muhammed Furkan Tosun, Ethem Burak Oklaz, Asim Ahmadov, Cem Ismail Gungor, Mehmet Ali Tokgoz, Ibrahim Kaya, Mustafa Melik Can, Ulunay Kanatli","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), significant clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic status (PASS) in patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of bony Bankart lesions and to analyze the effect of patient characteristics on these parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case series included patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for bony Bankart lesions by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were patients with <25% glenoid bone defect and a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Assessment included Rowe, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), SANE (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Patients who met the MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds for Rowe, ASES, SANE, and VAS were determined. Regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting thresholds achievement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients (mean age 32.2 ± 12.3 years; mean follow-up 57.5 ± 25.4) were included in the study. MCID, PASS, and SCB thresholds were calculated, respectively, for Rowe (9.9, 77.5, 32.5), ASES (9.7, 76.5, 36.5), SANE (11, 82.5, 27.5), and VAS (1.04, 3.5, 5.5). The rates of patients achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB were determined, respectively, Rowe (97%, 84%, 80%), ASES (98%, 79%, 71%), SANE (94%, 77%, 72%), and VAS (96%, 83%, 74%). Increased odds of achieving PASS and SCB were associated with early presentation. Reduced odds of achieving PASS and SCB were associated with dominant extremity involvement and off-track lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study revealed that early surgical stabilization was a positive predictor for achieving clinically significant outcomes, whereas dominant extremity involvement and off-track lesions were negative predictors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, therapeutic study, retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Surgical Stabilization Is a Positive Predictor Whereas Dominant Extremity Involvement and Off-Track Lesions Are Negative Predictors in Arthroscopic Repair of Bony Bankart Lesions With Glenoid Bone Loss <25.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Furkan Tosun, Ethem Burak Oklaz, Asim Ahmadov, Cem Ismail Gungor, Mehmet Ali Tokgoz, Ibrahim Kaya, Mustafa Melik Can, Ulunay Kanatli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), significant clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic status (PASS) in patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of bony Bankart lesions and to analyze the effect of patient characteristics on these parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case series included patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for bony Bankart lesions by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were patients with <25% glenoid bone defect and a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Assessment included Rowe, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), SANE (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Patients who met the MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds for Rowe, ASES, SANE, and VAS were determined. Regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting thresholds achievement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients (mean age 32.2 ± 12.3 years; mean follow-up 57.5 ± 25.4) were included in the study. MCID, PASS, and SCB thresholds were calculated, respectively, for Rowe (9.9, 77.5, 32.5), ASES (9.7, 76.5, 36.5), SANE (11, 82.5, 27.5), and VAS (1.04, 3.5, 5.5). The rates of patients achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB were determined, respectively, Rowe (97%, 84%, 80%), ASES (98%, 79%, 71%), SANE (94%, 77%, 72%), and VAS (96%, 83%, 74%). Increased odds of achieving PASS and SCB were associated with early presentation. Reduced odds of achieving PASS and SCB were associated with dominant extremity involvement and off-track lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study revealed that early surgical stabilization was a positive predictor for achieving clinically significant outcomes, whereas dominant extremity involvement and off-track lesions were negative predictors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, therapeutic study, retrospective case series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价关节镜下骨性Bankart病变修复患者的最小临床重要差异(MCID)、显著临床获益(SCB)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS),并分析患者特征对这些参数的影响。方法:本回顾性病例系列包括2015年至2022年间由单一外科医生接受肩关节镜治疗骨Bankart病变的患者。入选标准为关节盂骨缺损< 25%且随访时间不少于24个月的患者。评估包括Rowe,美国肩关节外科医生(ASES), SANE(单一评估数值评估)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。确定符合Rowe、ASES、SANE和VAS的MCID、SCB和PASS阈值的患者。采用回归分析确定影响阈值实现的因素。结果:共76例患者(平均年龄32.2±12.3岁;平均随访(57.5±25.4)例。分别计算Rowe(9.9、77.5、32.5)、ASES(9.7、76.5、36.5)、SANE(11、82.5、27.5)和VAS(1.04、3.5、5.5)的mcd、PASS和SCB阈值。分别测定患者达到MCID、PASS和SCB的比例,分别为Rowe(97%、84%、80%)、as(98%、79%、71%)、SANE(94%、77%、72%)和VAS(96%、83%、74%)。获得PASS和SCB的几率增加与早期就诊有关。获得PASS和SCB的几率降低与主肢受损伤和偏离轨道病变有关。结论:目前的研究表明,早期手术稳定是获得临床显著结果的积极预测因素,而主要肢体受累和偏离轨道病变是负面预测因素。证据等级:四级,治疗性研究,回顾性病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Surgical Stabilization Is a Positive Predictor Whereas Dominant Extremity Involvement and Off-Track Lesions Are Negative Predictors in Arthroscopic Repair of Bony Bankart Lesions With Glenoid Bone Loss <25.

Purpose: To evaluate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), significant clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic status (PASS) in patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of bony Bankart lesions and to analyze the effect of patient characteristics on these parameters.

Methods: This retrospective case series included patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for bony Bankart lesions by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were patients with <25% glenoid bone defect and a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Assessment included Rowe, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), SANE (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Patients who met the MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds for Rowe, ASES, SANE, and VAS were determined. Regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting thresholds achievement.

Results: A total of 76 patients (mean age 32.2 ± 12.3 years; mean follow-up 57.5 ± 25.4) were included in the study. MCID, PASS, and SCB thresholds were calculated, respectively, for Rowe (9.9, 77.5, 32.5), ASES (9.7, 76.5, 36.5), SANE (11, 82.5, 27.5), and VAS (1.04, 3.5, 5.5). The rates of patients achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB were determined, respectively, Rowe (97%, 84%, 80%), ASES (98%, 79%, 71%), SANE (94%, 77%, 72%), and VAS (96%, 83%, 74%). Increased odds of achieving PASS and SCB were associated with early presentation. Reduced odds of achieving PASS and SCB were associated with dominant extremity involvement and off-track lesions.

Conclusions: The current study revealed that early surgical stabilization was a positive predictor for achieving clinically significant outcomes, whereas dominant extremity involvement and off-track lesions were negative predictors.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study, retrospective case series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信