P C Ambe, G P Martin-Martin, A A Alam, S Chaudhri, B Bogdanic, H Ma, B Bolik, I H Roman, J Wu, J D P Hernandez, N Vasas, Q Dong, P Istok, R Schouten, S Kalaskar, Y Yao, T Bruketa, E Koulouteri, V Dobricani, C Zhe, P Giamundo
{"title":"激光瘘管治疗:超越有争议的方面:来自具有丰富手术经验的国际外科医生小组的最佳临床实践建议- FiLaC建议。","authors":"P C Ambe, G P Martin-Martin, A A Alam, S Chaudhri, B Bogdanic, H Ma, B Bolik, I H Roman, J Wu, J D P Hernandez, N Vasas, Q Dong, P Istok, R Schouten, S Kalaskar, Y Yao, T Bruketa, E Koulouteri, V Dobricani, C Zhe, P Giamundo","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03164-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC) represents a minimally invasive, sphincter-sparing technique for managing fistula in ano with increasing popularity among proctologists. Despite its increasing adoption, significant variations exist in the application of FiLaC in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of these recommendations was to define some basic principles and recommendations for performing a standard FiLaC procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recommendation development group (RDG) consisting of surgeons with experience in the FiLaC were invited to formulate recommendations for the procedure. The recommendations were generated following systematic literature research and discussion amongst experts (expert opinion) where no substantial literature was available. The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process. Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RDG developed 25 recommendations that were voted upon by 21 panelists from 13 nations. Consensus was reached for all 25 recommendations after the first Delphi round.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FiLaC RDG offers a comprehensive suite of recommendations to enhance the safety and efficacy of standard FiLaC procedures. These 25 detailed recommendations collectively address the full spectrum of FiLaC procedures-from laser settings, preoperative preparations, and perioperative strategies to postoperative care. This coherent framework is anticipated not only to standardize but also to refine the FiLaC technique to ensure best possible surgical outcomes while preserving patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laser fistula treatment: beyond the controversial aspects: best clinical practice recommendations from an international group of surgeons with extensive experience in the procedure-the FiLaC recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"P C Ambe, G P Martin-Martin, A A Alam, S Chaudhri, B Bogdanic, H Ma, B Bolik, I H Roman, J Wu, J D P Hernandez, N Vasas, Q Dong, P Istok, R Schouten, S Kalaskar, Y Yao, T Bruketa, E Koulouteri, V Dobricani, C Zhe, P Giamundo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-025-03164-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC) represents a minimally invasive, sphincter-sparing technique for managing fistula in ano with increasing popularity among proctologists. Despite its increasing adoption, significant variations exist in the application of FiLaC in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of these recommendations was to define some basic principles and recommendations for performing a standard FiLaC procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recommendation development group (RDG) consisting of surgeons with experience in the FiLaC were invited to formulate recommendations for the procedure. The recommendations were generated following systematic literature research and discussion amongst experts (expert opinion) where no substantial literature was available. The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process. Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RDG developed 25 recommendations that were voted upon by 21 panelists from 13 nations. Consensus was reached for all 25 recommendations after the first Delphi round.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FiLaC RDG offers a comprehensive suite of recommendations to enhance the safety and efficacy of standard FiLaC procedures. These 25 detailed recommendations collectively address the full spectrum of FiLaC procedures-from laser settings, preoperative preparations, and perioperative strategies to postoperative care. This coherent framework is anticipated not only to standardize but also to refine the FiLaC technique to ensure best possible surgical outcomes while preserving patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148987/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03164-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03164-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laser fistula treatment: beyond the controversial aspects: best clinical practice recommendations from an international group of surgeons with extensive experience in the procedure-the FiLaC recommendations.
Background: Fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC) represents a minimally invasive, sphincter-sparing technique for managing fistula in ano with increasing popularity among proctologists. Despite its increasing adoption, significant variations exist in the application of FiLaC in daily practice.
Purpose: The aim of these recommendations was to define some basic principles and recommendations for performing a standard FiLaC procedure.
Methods: The recommendation development group (RDG) consisting of surgeons with experience in the FiLaC were invited to formulate recommendations for the procedure. The recommendations were generated following systematic literature research and discussion amongst experts (expert opinion) where no substantial literature was available. The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process. Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above.
Results: The RDG developed 25 recommendations that were voted upon by 21 panelists from 13 nations. Consensus was reached for all 25 recommendations after the first Delphi round.
Conclusion: The FiLaC RDG offers a comprehensive suite of recommendations to enhance the safety and efficacy of standard FiLaC procedures. These 25 detailed recommendations collectively address the full spectrum of FiLaC procedures-from laser settings, preoperative preparations, and perioperative strategies to postoperative care. This coherent framework is anticipated not only to standardize but also to refine the FiLaC technique to ensure best possible surgical outcomes while preserving patient safety.
期刊介绍:
Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.