激光瘘管治疗:超越有争议的方面:来自具有丰富手术经验的国际外科医生小组的最佳临床实践建议- FiLaC建议。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
P C Ambe, G P Martin-Martin, A A Alam, S Chaudhri, B Bogdanic, H Ma, B Bolik, I H Roman, J Wu, J D P Hernandez, N Vasas, Q Dong, P Istok, R Schouten, S Kalaskar, Y Yao, T Bruketa, E Koulouteri, V Dobricani, C Zhe, P Giamundo
{"title":"激光瘘管治疗:超越有争议的方面:来自具有丰富手术经验的国际外科医生小组的最佳临床实践建议- FiLaC建议。","authors":"P C Ambe, G P Martin-Martin, A A Alam, S Chaudhri, B Bogdanic, H Ma, B Bolik, I H Roman, J Wu, J D P Hernandez, N Vasas, Q Dong, P Istok, R Schouten, S Kalaskar, Y Yao, T Bruketa, E Koulouteri, V Dobricani, C Zhe, P Giamundo","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03164-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC) represents a minimally invasive, sphincter-sparing technique for managing fistula in ano with increasing popularity among proctologists. Despite its increasing adoption, significant variations exist in the application of FiLaC in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of these recommendations was to define some basic principles and recommendations for performing a standard FiLaC procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recommendation development group (RDG) consisting of surgeons with experience in the FiLaC were invited to formulate recommendations for the procedure. The recommendations were generated following systematic literature research and discussion amongst experts (expert opinion) where no substantial literature was available. The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process. Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RDG developed 25 recommendations that were voted upon by 21 panelists from 13 nations. Consensus was reached for all 25 recommendations after the first Delphi round.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FiLaC RDG offers a comprehensive suite of recommendations to enhance the safety and efficacy of standard FiLaC procedures. These 25 detailed recommendations collectively address the full spectrum of FiLaC procedures-from laser settings, preoperative preparations, and perioperative strategies to postoperative care. This coherent framework is anticipated not only to standardize but also to refine the FiLaC technique to ensure best possible surgical outcomes while preserving patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laser fistula treatment: beyond the controversial aspects: best clinical practice recommendations from an international group of surgeons with extensive experience in the procedure-the FiLaC recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"P C Ambe, G P Martin-Martin, A A Alam, S Chaudhri, B Bogdanic, H Ma, B Bolik, I H Roman, J Wu, J D P Hernandez, N Vasas, Q Dong, P Istok, R Schouten, S Kalaskar, Y Yao, T Bruketa, E Koulouteri, V Dobricani, C Zhe, P Giamundo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-025-03164-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC) represents a minimally invasive, sphincter-sparing technique for managing fistula in ano with increasing popularity among proctologists. Despite its increasing adoption, significant variations exist in the application of FiLaC in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of these recommendations was to define some basic principles and recommendations for performing a standard FiLaC procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recommendation development group (RDG) consisting of surgeons with experience in the FiLaC were invited to formulate recommendations for the procedure. The recommendations were generated following systematic literature research and discussion amongst experts (expert opinion) where no substantial literature was available. The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process. Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RDG developed 25 recommendations that were voted upon by 21 panelists from 13 nations. Consensus was reached for all 25 recommendations after the first Delphi round.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FiLaC RDG offers a comprehensive suite of recommendations to enhance the safety and efficacy of standard FiLaC procedures. These 25 detailed recommendations collectively address the full spectrum of FiLaC procedures-from laser settings, preoperative preparations, and perioperative strategies to postoperative care. This coherent framework is anticipated not only to standardize but also to refine the FiLaC technique to ensure best possible surgical outcomes while preserving patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148987/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03164-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03164-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:瘘管束激光闭合术(FiLaC)是一种微创、保留括约肌的技术,在肛肠科医生中越来越受欢迎。尽管FiLaC被越来越多地采用,但在日常实践中的应用中存在着显著的变化。目的:这些建议的目的是定义执行标准FiLaC程序的一些基本原则和建议。方法:邀请具有FiLaC手术经验的外科医生组成的建议制定小组(RDG)制定手术建议。在没有实质性文献的情况下,这些建议是在系统的文献研究和专家讨论(专家意见)之后产生的。制定的建议由小组成员通过德尔菲程序投票表决。共识被先验地定义为75%及以上的同意。结果:RDG提出了25项建议,由来自13个国家的21名小组成员投票表决。在第一轮德尔菲会议之后,就所有25项建议达成了协商一致意见。结论:FiLaC RDG提供了一套全面的建议,以提高标准FiLaC程序的安全性和有效性。这25个详细的建议共同解决了FiLaC手术的全部范围-从激光设置,术前准备,围手术期策略到术后护理。这一连贯的框架不仅可以标准化,还可以改进FiLaC技术,以确保最佳的手术效果,同时保护患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laser fistula treatment: beyond the controversial aspects: best clinical practice recommendations from an international group of surgeons with extensive experience in the procedure-the FiLaC recommendations.

Background: Fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC) represents a minimally invasive, sphincter-sparing technique for managing fistula in ano with increasing popularity among proctologists. Despite its increasing adoption, significant variations exist in the application of FiLaC in daily practice.

Purpose: The aim of these recommendations was to define some basic principles and recommendations for performing a standard FiLaC procedure.

Methods: The recommendation development group (RDG) consisting of surgeons with experience in the FiLaC were invited to formulate recommendations for the procedure. The recommendations were generated following systematic literature research and discussion amongst experts (expert opinion) where no substantial literature was available. The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process. Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above.

Results: The RDG developed 25 recommendations that were voted upon by 21 panelists from 13 nations. Consensus was reached for all 25 recommendations after the first Delphi round.

Conclusion: The FiLaC RDG offers a comprehensive suite of recommendations to enhance the safety and efficacy of standard FiLaC procedures. These 25 detailed recommendations collectively address the full spectrum of FiLaC procedures-from laser settings, preoperative preparations, and perioperative strategies to postoperative care. This coherent framework is anticipated not only to standardize but also to refine the FiLaC technique to ensure best possible surgical outcomes while preserving patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信