用热释光体内剂量法评估高剂量率钴-60腔内近距离治疗宫颈癌的直肠剂量:一项使用正交图像计划的两组队列研究

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI:10.5114/jcb.2025.150247
Omega Moses Mlawa, Justin Emmanuel Ngaile, Pradumna Prasad Chaurasia, Aloyce Isaya Amasi
{"title":"用热释光体内剂量法评估高剂量率钴-60腔内近距离治疗宫颈癌的直肠剂量:一项使用正交图像计划的两组队列研究","authors":"Omega Moses Mlawa, Justin Emmanuel Ngaile, Pradumna Prasad Chaurasia, Aloyce Isaya Amasi","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.150247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy delivers high radiation doses to tumors while minimizing exposure to surrounding normal cells. However, inappropriate administration can lead to radiation-induced toxicity by overdosing organs at risk. This study evaluated and compared the rectum doses planned by treatment planning system and measured using a thermoluminescent dosimeter.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were employed to measure radiation dose to the rectum across two patient groups: one treated using first fraction-based planning (FFP), and the other with each fraction planned individually (EFP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean dose measured by TLD (3.99 ±1.63 Gy) was higher than the mean dose planned by TPS (3.23 ±1.16 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean dose difference was higher in second fraction (0.87 ±1.89 Gy) for first fraction-based planning group; however, the differences between first and second fractions were not statistically significant in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients transferred from a brachytherapy couch to a hospital stretcher during applicator insertion and dose delivery, first fraction-based planning is feasible. However, caution is needed to minimize applicator shifts, as these changes can alter the geometric position between fractions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 2","pages":"133-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of rectal dose with thermoluminescent in vivo dosimetry in high-dose-rate cobalt-60 intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A two-arm cohort study using orthogonal images planning.\",\"authors\":\"Omega Moses Mlawa, Justin Emmanuel Ngaile, Pradumna Prasad Chaurasia, Aloyce Isaya Amasi\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jcb.2025.150247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy delivers high radiation doses to tumors while minimizing exposure to surrounding normal cells. However, inappropriate administration can lead to radiation-induced toxicity by overdosing organs at risk. This study evaluated and compared the rectum doses planned by treatment planning system and measured using a thermoluminescent dosimeter.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were employed to measure radiation dose to the rectum across two patient groups: one treated using first fraction-based planning (FFP), and the other with each fraction planned individually (EFP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean dose measured by TLD (3.99 ±1.63 Gy) was higher than the mean dose planned by TPS (3.23 ±1.16 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean dose difference was higher in second fraction (0.87 ±1.89 Gy) for first fraction-based planning group; however, the differences between first and second fractions were not statistically significant in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients transferred from a brachytherapy couch to a hospital stretcher during applicator insertion and dose delivery, first fraction-based planning is feasible. However, caution is needed to minimize applicator shifts, as these changes can alter the geometric position between fractions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"133-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2025.150247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2025.150247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:高剂量率腔内近距离放射治疗对肿瘤提供高剂量的辐射,同时尽量减少对周围正常细胞的暴露。然而,不适当的给药可导致辐射引起的毒性,过量的器官处于危险之中。本研究评估和比较了治疗计划系统计划的直肠剂量和使用热释光剂量计测量的剂量。材料和方法:采用热释光剂量计(TLD)测量两组患者的直肠辐射剂量:一组使用基于第一分数的计划(FFP),另一组使用每个分数单独计划(EFP)。结果:TLD测定的平均剂量(3.99±1.63 Gy)高于TPS计划的平均剂量(3.23±1.16 Gy, p < 0.001)。第一部分计划组第二部分的平均剂量差较大(0.87±1.89 Gy);然而,在两组中,第一和第二分数之间的差异没有统计学意义。结论:对于在插入和给药期间从近距离治疗床转移到医院担架上的患者,基于第一部分的计划是可行的。然而,谨慎是需要尽量减少涂抹器的变化,因为这些变化可以改变分数之间的几何位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of rectal dose with thermoluminescent in vivo dosimetry in high-dose-rate cobalt-60 intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A two-arm cohort study using orthogonal images planning.

Purpose: High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy delivers high radiation doses to tumors while minimizing exposure to surrounding normal cells. However, inappropriate administration can lead to radiation-induced toxicity by overdosing organs at risk. This study evaluated and compared the rectum doses planned by treatment planning system and measured using a thermoluminescent dosimeter.

Material and methods: Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were employed to measure radiation dose to the rectum across two patient groups: one treated using first fraction-based planning (FFP), and the other with each fraction planned individually (EFP).

Results: The mean dose measured by TLD (3.99 ±1.63 Gy) was higher than the mean dose planned by TPS (3.23 ±1.16 Gy, p < 0.001). The mean dose difference was higher in second fraction (0.87 ±1.89 Gy) for first fraction-based planning group; however, the differences between first and second fractions were not statistically significant in either group.

Conclusions: For patients transferred from a brachytherapy couch to a hospital stretcher during applicator insertion and dose delivery, first fraction-based planning is feasible. However, caution is needed to minimize applicator shifts, as these changes can alter the geometric position between fractions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信