癌症患者和护理人员对电话癌症信息和支持的偏好:离散选择实验的属性和水平选择。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ann Livingstone, Lidia Engel, Victoria White, Daswin De Silva, Jessica Bucholc, April Murphy, Elaine Cook, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Liliana Orellana, Julie Ratcliffe, Danielle Spence, Nikki McCaffrey
{"title":"癌症患者和护理人员对电话癌症信息和支持的偏好:离散选择实验的属性和水平选择。","authors":"Ann Livingstone, Lidia Engel, Victoria White, Daswin De Silva, Jessica Bucholc, April Murphy, Elaine Cook, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Liliana Orellana, Julie Ratcliffe, Danielle Spence, Nikki McCaffrey","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00746-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Telephone cancer information and support services (CISS) deliver essential evidence-based resources for people living with cancer. This research aimed to describe how attributes and levels were developed for a future discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for operational characteristics of a CISS, focusing on Cancer Council Victoria's service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a mixed-methods approach guided by the ISPOR checklist for conjoint analysis in healthcare, initial attributes were developed using an artificial intelligence framework to analyse CISS calls (January 2018-December 2021), focus groups with people with cancer and carers using the CISS (July-August 2022), and a systematic literature review of qualitative studies. A four-stage descriptive process guided attribute and level development. An expert panel of researchers (n = 10), a CISS staff member, a person with lived experience of cancer and a consumer-only panel (n = 7) met monthly to prioritise, refine and finalise attributes by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Call data analysis (people with cancer n = 7701; carers n = 5500), six focus groups (people with cancer n = 10; carers n = 11) and a systematic literature review of qualitative studies generated 14 candidate attributes. The expert panels selected seven final attributes, each with three levels: follow-up call, operating hours, additional technology, operator type, operator consistency, call length and service fee.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transparent reporting of the discrete choice experiment design process is essential for credible interpretation. The four-stage approach enhanced the comprehensibility of the experiment, as multi-modal data ensured the selected attributes and levels accurately reflect CISS caller priorities, which may be applicable to other choice-based studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences for Telephone Cancer Information and Support in People with Cancer and Carers: Attribute and Level Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Livingstone, Lidia Engel, Victoria White, Daswin De Silva, Jessica Bucholc, April Murphy, Elaine Cook, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Liliana Orellana, Julie Ratcliffe, Danielle Spence, Nikki McCaffrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40271-025-00746-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Telephone cancer information and support services (CISS) deliver essential evidence-based resources for people living with cancer. This research aimed to describe how attributes and levels were developed for a future discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for operational characteristics of a CISS, focusing on Cancer Council Victoria's service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a mixed-methods approach guided by the ISPOR checklist for conjoint analysis in healthcare, initial attributes were developed using an artificial intelligence framework to analyse CISS calls (January 2018-December 2021), focus groups with people with cancer and carers using the CISS (July-August 2022), and a systematic literature review of qualitative studies. A four-stage descriptive process guided attribute and level development. An expert panel of researchers (n = 10), a CISS staff member, a person with lived experience of cancer and a consumer-only panel (n = 7) met monthly to prioritise, refine and finalise attributes by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Call data analysis (people with cancer n = 7701; carers n = 5500), six focus groups (people with cancer n = 10; carers n = 11) and a systematic literature review of qualitative studies generated 14 candidate attributes. The expert panels selected seven final attributes, each with three levels: follow-up call, operating hours, additional technology, operator type, operator consistency, call length and service fee.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transparent reporting of the discrete choice experiment design process is essential for credible interpretation. The four-stage approach enhanced the comprehensibility of the experiment, as multi-modal data ensured the selected attributes and levels accurately reflect CISS caller priorities, which may be applicable to other choice-based studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-025-00746-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-025-00746-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:电话癌症信息和支持服务(CISS)为癌症患者提供必要的循证资源。本研究旨在描述如何为未来的离散选择实验开发属性和水平,以引出对CISS操作特性的偏好,重点是维多利亚癌症委员会的服务。方法:采用ISPOR清单指导的混合方法,在医疗保健领域进行联合分析,使用人工智能框架开发初始属性,分析CISS呼叫(2018年1月至2021年12月),癌症患者和护理人员使用CISS的焦点小组(2022年7月至8月),并对定性研究进行系统文献综述。一个四阶段的描述过程指导了属性和关卡的开发。一个由研究人员组成的专家小组(n = 10)、一名CISS工作人员、一名有过癌症经历的人以及一个仅针对消费者的小组(n = 7)每月开会一次,以协商一致的方式确定优先级、完善和最终确定属性。结果:电话数据分析(癌症患者n = 7701;护理人员n = 5500),六个焦点小组(癌症患者n = 10;护理人员n = 11)和对定性研究的系统文献综述产生了14个候选属性。专家组最终选择了七个属性,每个属性又分为三个层次:随访呼叫、运营时间、附加技术、运营商类型、运营商一致性、呼叫时长和服务费用。结论:离散选择实验设计过程的透明报告对于可信的解释至关重要。四阶段方法增强了实验的可理解性,因为多模态数据确保了所选择的属性和级别准确反映了CISS调用者的优先级,这可能适用于其他基于选择的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferences for Telephone Cancer Information and Support in People with Cancer and Carers: Attribute and Level Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Background and objective: Telephone cancer information and support services (CISS) deliver essential evidence-based resources for people living with cancer. This research aimed to describe how attributes and levels were developed for a future discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for operational characteristics of a CISS, focusing on Cancer Council Victoria's service.

Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach guided by the ISPOR checklist for conjoint analysis in healthcare, initial attributes were developed using an artificial intelligence framework to analyse CISS calls (January 2018-December 2021), focus groups with people with cancer and carers using the CISS (July-August 2022), and a systematic literature review of qualitative studies. A four-stage descriptive process guided attribute and level development. An expert panel of researchers (n = 10), a CISS staff member, a person with lived experience of cancer and a consumer-only panel (n = 7) met monthly to prioritise, refine and finalise attributes by consensus.

Results: Call data analysis (people with cancer n = 7701; carers n = 5500), six focus groups (people with cancer n = 10; carers n = 11) and a systematic literature review of qualitative studies generated 14 candidate attributes. The expert panels selected seven final attributes, each with three levels: follow-up call, operating hours, additional technology, operator type, operator consistency, call length and service fee.

Conclusions: Transparent reporting of the discrete choice experiment design process is essential for credible interpretation. The four-stage approach enhanced the comprehensibility of the experiment, as multi-modal data ensured the selected attributes and levels accurately reflect CISS caller priorities, which may be applicable to other choice-based studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research
Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Patient provides a venue for scientifically rigorous, timely, and relevant research to promote the development, evaluation and implementation of therapies, technologies, and innovations that will enhance the patient experience. It is an international forum for research that advances and/or applies qualitative or quantitative methods to promote the generation, synthesis, or interpretation of evidence. The journal has specific interest in receiving original research, reviews and commentaries related to qualitative and mixed methods research, stated-preference methods, patient reported outcomes, and shared decision making. Advances in regulatory science, patient-focused drug development, patient-centered benefit-risk and health technology assessment will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in The Patient may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances. All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信