儿科临床医生在线对话阅读训练计划：一项随机对照研究。

IF 2.8 3区医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS

Academic Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2025.102873

Larntip Sutthirat MD , Ketsupar Jirakran PhD , Pon Trairatvorakul MD , Weerasak Chonchaiya MD

{"title":"儿科临床医生在线对话阅读训练计划：一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Larntip Sutthirat MD , Ketsupar Jirakran PhD , Pon Trairatvorakul MD , Weerasak Chonchaiya MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Pediatric clinicians (PC) play a pivotal role in promoting early development and literacy. Integrating dialogic reading (DR) techniques into routine pediatric care may offer long-term benefits; however, evidence supporting online DR training for PC is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an online DR training program in improving DR skills, knowledge, and attitudes among PC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A randomized controlled trial involving 104 participants was conducted. The intervention group received 1 weekly instructional video via a private communication application for 3 weeks. DR skills, knowledge, and attitudes were assessed at baseline, 3 weeks, and 7 weeks post baseline using a storytelling task, knowledge questionnaires, and attitude scales, respectively. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze group differences over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DR skills, knowledge, and specific technique scores improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group over 7 weeks (<em>P</em> < .001). Additionally, the intervention group showed significant within-group improvements in DR skills, knowledge, and attitudes at both 3 and 7 weeks post baseline. However, attitudes toward DR did not differ significantly between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Online DR training can effectively improve DR skills and knowledge among PC. Implementing such training in clinical practice may help clinicians more practically support early literacy development in children through caregiver engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":"25 7","pages":"Article 102873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Dialogic Reading Training Program for Pediatric Clinicians: A Randomized Controlled Study\",\"authors\":\"Larntip Sutthirat MD , Ketsupar Jirakran PhD , Pon Trairatvorakul MD , Weerasak Chonchaiya MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Pediatric clinicians (PC) play a pivotal role in promoting early development and literacy. Integrating dialogic reading (DR) techniques into routine pediatric care may offer long-term benefits; however, evidence supporting online DR training for PC is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an online DR training program in improving DR skills, knowledge, and attitudes among PC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A randomized controlled trial involving 104 participants was conducted. The intervention group received 1 weekly instructional video via a private communication application for 3 weeks. DR skills, knowledge, and attitudes were assessed at baseline, 3 weeks, and 7 weeks post baseline using a storytelling task, knowledge questionnaires, and attitude scales, respectively. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze group differences over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DR skills, knowledge, and specific technique scores improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group over 7 weeks (<em>P</em> < .001). Additionally, the intervention group showed significant within-group improvements in DR skills, knowledge, and attitudes at both 3 and 7 weeks post baseline. However, attitudes toward DR did not differ significantly between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Online DR training can effectively improve DR skills and knowledge among PC. Implementing such training in clinical practice may help clinicians more practically support early literacy development in children through caregiver engagement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 102873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000981\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：儿科临床医生（PC）在促进儿童早期发育和识字方面发挥着关键作用。将对话阅读（DR）技术整合到常规儿科护理中可能会带来长期的好处；然而，支持PC在线DR培训的证据有限。本研究评估了在线医疗培训计划在提高个人电脑医疗技能、知识和态度方面的有效性。方法：采用随机对照试验104例。干预组每周通过私人通信应用程序接收一个教学视频，持续三周。分别在基线、基线后3周和基线后7周使用讲故事任务、知识问卷和态度量表对DR技能、知识和态度进行评估。使用广义估计方程来分析组间随时间的差异。结果：干预组的DR技能、知识和特定技术评分在7周内较对照组有显著提高（p < 0.001）。此外，在基线后3周和7周，干预组在DR技能、知识和态度方面都有显著的组内改善。然而，对DR的态度在两组之间没有显著差异。结论：在线容灾培训能有效提高PC用户的容灾技能和知识。在临床实践中实施这样的培训可以帮助临床医生通过照顾者的参与更实际地支持儿童的早期识字发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Online Dialogic Reading Training Program for Pediatric Clinicians: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objective

Pediatric clinicians (PC) play a pivotal role in promoting early development and literacy. Integrating dialogic reading (DR) techniques into routine pediatric care may offer long-term benefits; however, evidence supporting online DR training for PC is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an online DR training program in improving DR skills, knowledge, and attitudes among PC.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial involving 104 participants was conducted. The intervention group received 1 weekly instructional video via a private communication application for 3 weeks. DR skills, knowledge, and attitudes were assessed at baseline, 3 weeks, and 7 weeks post baseline using a storytelling task, knowledge questionnaires, and attitude scales, respectively. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze group differences over time.

Results

DR skills, knowledge, and specific technique scores improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group over 7 weeks (P < .001). Additionally, the intervention group showed significant within-group improvements in DR skills, knowledge, and attitudes at both 3 and 7 weeks post baseline. However, attitudes toward DR did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions

Online DR training can effectively improve DR skills and knowledge among PC. Implementing such training in clinical practice may help clinicians more practically support early literacy development in children through caregiver engagement.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

12.90%

发文量

300

审稿时长

60 days

期刊介绍： Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.