在不信任和两极分化时期的规范影响:感知的社会规范如何预测美国黑人的COVID-19疫苗接种意图。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1007/s10865-025-00578-7
Tong Lin, Yuan Wang, Kathryn Thier, Xiaoli Nan
{"title":"在不信任和两极分化时期的规范影响:感知的社会规范如何预测美国黑人的COVID-19疫苗接种意图。","authors":"Tong Lin, Yuan Wang, Kathryn Thier, Xiaoli Nan","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00578-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the impact of social norms-descriptive, injunctive, and subjective norms-on COVID-19 vaccination intentions among Black Americans. It also investigated how Black Americans affiliated with Democrats and Republicans perceived norms within their groups and how such perceptions influenced their COVID-19 vaccination intentions. We conducted an online national survey with Black Americans (N = 1497) between February and March 2021. Results showed that all three types of norms were significantly and positively associated with vaccination intentions, with subjective norms exerting the strongest effect. Additionally, higher subjective norms amplified the positive relationship between descriptive norms and vaccination intentions. Republicans were influenced by both in-group and out-group norms, while Democrats were primarily guided by in-group norms, underscoring the potential of bipartisan messaging to boost vaccine uptake. These findings highlight how social norms impact COVID-19 vaccination intentions and reveal that individuals with differing party affiliations are influenced differently based on their perceived identification with reference groups. The study provides insights for designing targeted interventions to improve vaccine uptake among Black Americans and for developing broader public health messaging strategies. It contributes to the literature by revealing how the interplay of descriptive, injunctive, and subjective norms shapes vaccination intentions and by offering a novel perspective on the differentiated effects of in-group and out-group norms based on partisan identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"644-658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12307515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normative influence in a time of distrust and polarization: how perceived social norms predict COVID-19 vaccination intentions among Black Americans.\",\"authors\":\"Tong Lin, Yuan Wang, Kathryn Thier, Xiaoli Nan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10865-025-00578-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined the impact of social norms-descriptive, injunctive, and subjective norms-on COVID-19 vaccination intentions among Black Americans. It also investigated how Black Americans affiliated with Democrats and Republicans perceived norms within their groups and how such perceptions influenced their COVID-19 vaccination intentions. We conducted an online national survey with Black Americans (N = 1497) between February and March 2021. Results showed that all three types of norms were significantly and positively associated with vaccination intentions, with subjective norms exerting the strongest effect. Additionally, higher subjective norms amplified the positive relationship between descriptive norms and vaccination intentions. Republicans were influenced by both in-group and out-group norms, while Democrats were primarily guided by in-group norms, underscoring the potential of bipartisan messaging to boost vaccine uptake. These findings highlight how social norms impact COVID-19 vaccination intentions and reveal that individuals with differing party affiliations are influenced differently based on their perceived identification with reference groups. The study provides insights for designing targeted interventions to improve vaccine uptake among Black Americans and for developing broader public health messaging strategies. It contributes to the literature by revealing how the interplay of descriptive, injunctive, and subjective norms shapes vaccination intentions and by offering a novel perspective on the differentiated effects of in-group and out-group norms based on partisan identity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"644-658\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12307515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00578-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00578-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了社会规范(描述性、禁令性和主观规范)对美国黑人COVID-19疫苗接种意愿的影响。它还调查了隶属于民主党和共和党的黑人美国人如何看待他们群体内的规范,以及这种看法如何影响他们的COVID-19疫苗接种意图。我们在2021年2月至3月期间对美国黑人(N = 1497)进行了一项在线全国调查。结果表明,三种规范均与接种意愿呈显著正相关,其中主观规范的影响最大。此外,较高的主观规范放大了描述性规范与疫苗接种意图之间的正相关关系。共和党人受到群体内和群体外规范的影响,而民主党人主要受到群体内规范的指导,强调了两党信息传递促进疫苗接种的潜力。这些发现突出了社会规范如何影响COVID-19疫苗接种意愿,并揭示了不同党派的个人因其对参考群体的感知认同而受到不同的影响。这项研究为设计有针对性的干预措施以提高美国黑人的疫苗吸收率和制定更广泛的公共卫生信息战略提供了见解。它通过揭示描述性、禁令性和主观规范如何相互作用来塑造疫苗接种意图,并通过提供基于党派认同的群体内和群体外规范的差异化影响的新视角,为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normative influence in a time of distrust and polarization: how perceived social norms predict COVID-19 vaccination intentions among Black Americans.

This study examined the impact of social norms-descriptive, injunctive, and subjective norms-on COVID-19 vaccination intentions among Black Americans. It also investigated how Black Americans affiliated with Democrats and Republicans perceived norms within their groups and how such perceptions influenced their COVID-19 vaccination intentions. We conducted an online national survey with Black Americans (N = 1497) between February and March 2021. Results showed that all three types of norms were significantly and positively associated with vaccination intentions, with subjective norms exerting the strongest effect. Additionally, higher subjective norms amplified the positive relationship between descriptive norms and vaccination intentions. Republicans were influenced by both in-group and out-group norms, while Democrats were primarily guided by in-group norms, underscoring the potential of bipartisan messaging to boost vaccine uptake. These findings highlight how social norms impact COVID-19 vaccination intentions and reveal that individuals with differing party affiliations are influenced differently based on their perceived identification with reference groups. The study provides insights for designing targeted interventions to improve vaccine uptake among Black Americans and for developing broader public health messaging strategies. It contributes to the literature by revealing how the interplay of descriptive, injunctive, and subjective norms shapes vaccination intentions and by offering a novel perspective on the differentiated effects of in-group and out-group norms based on partisan identity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信