{"title":"为什么医疗同意是个人的？","authors":"Albert Pielak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article engages with the nature of medical consent in the context of a patient's proxy granted in case of decision-making capacity. It argues that based on the general legal provisions on proxy, the patient cannot make medical decisions by a representative. Therefore, informed consent is of a personal nature. The thesis is supported by a comparative-legal analysis of selected continental and common law systems, Kant's and Mill's concept of autonomy, and functional reasoning.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"85-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Is Medical Consent Personal?\",\"authors\":\"Albert Pielak\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The article engages with the nature of medical consent in the context of a patient's proxy granted in case of decision-making capacity. It argues that based on the general legal provisions on proxy, the patient cannot make medical decisions by a representative. Therefore, informed consent is of a personal nature. The thesis is supported by a comparative-legal analysis of selected continental and common law systems, Kant's and Mill's concept of autonomy, and functional reasoning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"85-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
The article engages with the nature of medical consent in the context of a patient's proxy granted in case of decision-making capacity. It argues that based on the general legal provisions on proxy, the patient cannot make medical decisions by a representative. Therefore, informed consent is of a personal nature. The thesis is supported by a comparative-legal analysis of selected continental and common law systems, Kant's and Mill's concept of autonomy, and functional reasoning.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
