沉默的伙伴:人工智能对知情同意影响的叙述回顾。

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01
Julia van den Heuvel, Anthony Porter, Emily Kirkpatrick, Johan Verjans, Sandeep Reddy, Ian Freckelton
{"title":"沉默的伙伴:人工智能对知情同意影响的叙述回顾。","authors":"Julia van den Heuvel, Anthony Porter, Emily Kirkpatrick, Johan Verjans, Sandeep Reddy, Ian Freckelton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into health care presents significant challenges for traditional informed consent practices. This review examines the legal and ethical implications of using AI in clinical decision-making, with a focus on maintaining transparency and respecting patient autonomy. While the legal framework for informed consent remains clear - requiring clinicians to provide sufficient information on material risks and likely outcomes - the complexity of AI introduces nuances that demand adaptation. Unlike surgical consent, where decisions are directly tied to human judgment, AI systems analyse vast datasets and identify patterns beyond human comprehension, complicating clinicians' ability to provide clear explanations. However, this does not necessitate a complete overhaul of informed consent but, rather, careful reassessment. Practical approaches include tiered consent protocols tailored to AI complexity and enhanced clinician education to bridge the communication gap. By addressing these challenges, informed consent can evolve to support ethical AI integration while preserving patient trust and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"74-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Silent Partner: A Narrative Review of AI's Impact on Informed Consent.\",\"authors\":\"Julia van den Heuvel, Anthony Porter, Emily Kirkpatrick, Johan Verjans, Sandeep Reddy, Ian Freckelton\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into health care presents significant challenges for traditional informed consent practices. This review examines the legal and ethical implications of using AI in clinical decision-making, with a focus on maintaining transparency and respecting patient autonomy. While the legal framework for informed consent remains clear - requiring clinicians to provide sufficient information on material risks and likely outcomes - the complexity of AI introduces nuances that demand adaptation. Unlike surgical consent, where decisions are directly tied to human judgment, AI systems analyse vast datasets and identify patterns beyond human comprehension, complicating clinicians' ability to provide clear explanations. However, this does not necessitate a complete overhaul of informed consent but, rather, careful reassessment. Practical approaches include tiered consent protocols tailored to AI complexity and enhanced clinician education to bridge the communication gap. By addressing these challenges, informed consent can evolve to support ethical AI integration while preserving patient trust and decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"74-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)与医疗保健的整合对传统的知情同意做法提出了重大挑战。本综述探讨了在临床决策中使用人工智能的法律和伦理影响,重点是保持透明度和尊重患者自主权。虽然知情同意的法律框架仍然明确——要求临床医生提供有关重大风险和可能结果的充分信息——但人工智能的复杂性引入了需要适应的细微差别。手术同意的决定与人类的判断直接相关,而人工智能系统分析大量数据集并识别超出人类理解的模式,使临床医生提供明确解释的能力复杂化。然而,这并不需要对知情同意进行彻底的改革,而是需要仔细的重新评估。实用的方法包括针对人工智能复杂性量身定制的分层同意协议,以及加强临床医生教育以弥合沟通差距。通过应对这些挑战,知情同意可以发展为支持道德人工智能整合,同时保持患者的信任和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Silent Partner: A Narrative Review of AI's Impact on Informed Consent.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into health care presents significant challenges for traditional informed consent practices. This review examines the legal and ethical implications of using AI in clinical decision-making, with a focus on maintaining transparency and respecting patient autonomy. While the legal framework for informed consent remains clear - requiring clinicians to provide sufficient information on material risks and likely outcomes - the complexity of AI introduces nuances that demand adaptation. Unlike surgical consent, where decisions are directly tied to human judgment, AI systems analyse vast datasets and identify patterns beyond human comprehension, complicating clinicians' ability to provide clear explanations. However, this does not necessitate a complete overhaul of informed consent but, rather, careful reassessment. Practical approaches include tiered consent protocols tailored to AI complexity and enhanced clinician education to bridge the communication gap. By addressing these challenges, informed consent can evolve to support ethical AI integration while preserving patient trust and decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信