现实世界中使用聚多醇泡沫硬化疗法治疗痔疮疾病:来自一项国际调查和临床实践建议的系统评价的见解。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Gaetano Gallo, Ugo Grossi, Veronica De Simone, Arcangelo Picciariello, Elia Diaco, Pin Fan, Hongbo He, Jun Li, Hongcheng Lin, Marco La Torre, Rita Laforgia, Pierluigi Lobascio, Hui Ma, Francesco Pata, Roberto Perinotti, Vincent Parades, Mauro Pozzo, Alberto Realis Luc, Paulo Salgueiro, Adam Skowronski, Pingliang Sun, Mario Trompetto, Roberta Tutino, Chen Wang, Zhenyi Wang, Zhenquan Wang, Jiong Wu, Yuru Zhang, Shipeng Zhao, Xiandong Zeng, Vitor Fernandes, Karl-Heinz Moser, Donglin Ren, Pierpaolo Sileri, Gianpiero Gravante
{"title":"现实世界中使用聚多醇泡沫硬化疗法治疗痔疮疾病:来自一项国际调查和临床实践建议的系统评价的见解。","authors":"Gaetano Gallo, Ugo Grossi, Veronica De Simone, Arcangelo Picciariello, Elia Diaco, Pin Fan, Hongbo He, Jun Li, Hongcheng Lin, Marco La Torre, Rita Laforgia, Pierluigi Lobascio, Hui Ma, Francesco Pata, Roberto Perinotti, Vincent Parades, Mauro Pozzo, Alberto Realis Luc, Paulo Salgueiro, Adam Skowronski, Pingliang Sun, Mario Trompetto, Roberta Tutino, Chen Wang, Zhenyi Wang, Zhenquan Wang, Jiong Wu, Yuru Zhang, Shipeng Zhao, Xiandong Zeng, Vitor Fernandes, Karl-Heinz Moser, Donglin Ren, Pierpaolo Sileri, Gianpiero Gravante","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02258-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). However, significant variability exists in its clinical application regarding patient selection, procedural techniques, and postoperative management. This study aimed to assess real-world practice patterns among international experts, summarize existing evidence through a systematic literature review, and develop evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to identify studies evaluating polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Additionally, an international survey was distributed to 30 experts in proctology and colorectal surgery to explore variations in indications, perioperative management, technique, and follow-up. Survey responses were analyzed descriptively to identify common trends and areas of divergence. Subsequently, based on both the experts' opinions and the results of the survey, a Delphi method was employed to produce clinical practice recommendations. The questions for the Delphi process were developed by the authors leading the project, followed by a detailed discussion with the whole panel of experts. Most experts (90%) reported using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy primarily for Goligher grade II HD, with 67% extending its use to grade III cases. Preoperative bowel preparation and anesthesia use varied widely. The preferred concentration was 3% polidocanol, with 2 mL injected per hemorrhoidal pile in most cases. Post-procedural care lacked standardization, though stool softeners and flavonoids were commonly recommended. Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%). Adverse events were infrequent. The present article offers a comprehensive suite of clinical practice expert-based recommendations concerning the use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. However, there is still significant variation in its application. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize procedural strategies and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: insights from an international survey and systematic review with clinical practice recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Gaetano Gallo, Ugo Grossi, Veronica De Simone, Arcangelo Picciariello, Elia Diaco, Pin Fan, Hongbo He, Jun Li, Hongcheng Lin, Marco La Torre, Rita Laforgia, Pierluigi Lobascio, Hui Ma, Francesco Pata, Roberto Perinotti, Vincent Parades, Mauro Pozzo, Alberto Realis Luc, Paulo Salgueiro, Adam Skowronski, Pingliang Sun, Mario Trompetto, Roberta Tutino, Chen Wang, Zhenyi Wang, Zhenquan Wang, Jiong Wu, Yuru Zhang, Shipeng Zhao, Xiandong Zeng, Vitor Fernandes, Karl-Heinz Moser, Donglin Ren, Pierpaolo Sileri, Gianpiero Gravante\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02258-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). However, significant variability exists in its clinical application regarding patient selection, procedural techniques, and postoperative management. This study aimed to assess real-world practice patterns among international experts, summarize existing evidence through a systematic literature review, and develop evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to identify studies evaluating polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Additionally, an international survey was distributed to 30 experts in proctology and colorectal surgery to explore variations in indications, perioperative management, technique, and follow-up. Survey responses were analyzed descriptively to identify common trends and areas of divergence. Subsequently, based on both the experts' opinions and the results of the survey, a Delphi method was employed to produce clinical practice recommendations. The questions for the Delphi process were developed by the authors leading the project, followed by a detailed discussion with the whole panel of experts. Most experts (90%) reported using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy primarily for Goligher grade II HD, with 67% extending its use to grade III cases. Preoperative bowel preparation and anesthesia use varied widely. The preferred concentration was 3% polidocanol, with 2 mL injected per hemorrhoidal pile in most cases. Post-procedural care lacked standardization, though stool softeners and flavonoids were commonly recommended. Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%). Adverse events were infrequent. The present article offers a comprehensive suite of clinical practice expert-based recommendations concerning the use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. However, there is still significant variation in its application. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize procedural strategies and long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02258-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02258-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聚多卡因醇泡沫硬化疗法作为一种微创治疗痔疮疾病(HD)的方法越来越受到关注。然而,其临床应用在患者选择、手术技术和术后管理方面存在显著差异。本研究旨在评估国际专家的现实世界实践模式,通过系统的文献综述总结现有证据,并提出基于证据的临床实践建议。在MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL中进行了一项系统综述,以确定评估聚多醇泡沫硬化治疗HD的研究。共有20项研究符合纳入标准。此外,我们还向30位直肠外科专家进行了一项国际调查,以探讨适应症、围手术期管理、技术和随访方面的差异。对调查结果进行描述性分析,以确定共同趋势和分歧领域。随后,根据专家意见和调查结果,采用德尔菲法提出临床实践建议。德尔菲过程的问题是由领导项目的作者开发的,随后与整个专家组进行了详细的讨论。大多数专家(90%)报告说,聚多醇泡沫硬化疗法主要用于高利尔II级HD, 67%的专家将其用于III级HD。术前肠道准备和麻醉的使用有很大的不同。首选浓度为3%聚多坎醇,多数情况下每痔桩注射2ml。术后护理缺乏标准化,尽管大便软化剂和类黄酮被普遍推荐。与橡皮筋结扎相比,聚多元醇泡沫结扎的成功率更高(88.3%比66.7%),复发率更低(16.1%比41.2%)。不良事件很少发生。本文提供了一套全面的临床实践专家为基础的建议关于使用聚多醇泡沫硬化治疗HD。然而,在其应用上仍有很大的差异。这些发现强调了标准化指南和进一步研究的必要性,以优化程序策略和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: insights from an international survey and systematic review with clinical practice recommendations.

Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). However, significant variability exists in its clinical application regarding patient selection, procedural techniques, and postoperative management. This study aimed to assess real-world practice patterns among international experts, summarize existing evidence through a systematic literature review, and develop evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to identify studies evaluating polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Additionally, an international survey was distributed to 30 experts in proctology and colorectal surgery to explore variations in indications, perioperative management, technique, and follow-up. Survey responses were analyzed descriptively to identify common trends and areas of divergence. Subsequently, based on both the experts' opinions and the results of the survey, a Delphi method was employed to produce clinical practice recommendations. The questions for the Delphi process were developed by the authors leading the project, followed by a detailed discussion with the whole panel of experts. Most experts (90%) reported using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy primarily for Goligher grade II HD, with 67% extending its use to grade III cases. Preoperative bowel preparation and anesthesia use varied widely. The preferred concentration was 3% polidocanol, with 2 mL injected per hemorrhoidal pile in most cases. Post-procedural care lacked standardization, though stool softeners and flavonoids were commonly recommended. Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%). Adverse events were infrequent. The present article offers a comprehensive suite of clinical practice expert-based recommendations concerning the use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. However, there is still significant variation in its application. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize procedural strategies and long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信