Gaetano Gallo, Ugo Grossi, Veronica De Simone, Arcangelo Picciariello, Elia Diaco, Pin Fan, Hongbo He, Jun Li, Hongcheng Lin, Marco La Torre, Rita Laforgia, Pierluigi Lobascio, Hui Ma, Francesco Pata, Roberto Perinotti, Vincent Parades, Mauro Pozzo, Alberto Realis Luc, Paulo Salgueiro, Adam Skowronski, Pingliang Sun, Mario Trompetto, Roberta Tutino, Chen Wang, Zhenyi Wang, Zhenquan Wang, Jiong Wu, Yuru Zhang, Shipeng Zhao, Xiandong Zeng, Vitor Fernandes, Karl-Heinz Moser, Donglin Ren, Pierpaolo Sileri, Gianpiero Gravante
{"title":"现实世界中使用聚多醇泡沫硬化疗法治疗痔疮疾病:来自一项国际调查和临床实践建议的系统评价的见解。","authors":"Gaetano Gallo, Ugo Grossi, Veronica De Simone, Arcangelo Picciariello, Elia Diaco, Pin Fan, Hongbo He, Jun Li, Hongcheng Lin, Marco La Torre, Rita Laforgia, Pierluigi Lobascio, Hui Ma, Francesco Pata, Roberto Perinotti, Vincent Parades, Mauro Pozzo, Alberto Realis Luc, Paulo Salgueiro, Adam Skowronski, Pingliang Sun, Mario Trompetto, Roberta Tutino, Chen Wang, Zhenyi Wang, Zhenquan Wang, Jiong Wu, Yuru Zhang, Shipeng Zhao, Xiandong Zeng, Vitor Fernandes, Karl-Heinz Moser, Donglin Ren, Pierpaolo Sileri, Gianpiero Gravante","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02258-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). However, significant variability exists in its clinical application regarding patient selection, procedural techniques, and postoperative management. This study aimed to assess real-world practice patterns among international experts, summarize existing evidence through a systematic literature review, and develop evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to identify studies evaluating polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Additionally, an international survey was distributed to 30 experts in proctology and colorectal surgery to explore variations in indications, perioperative management, technique, and follow-up. Survey responses were analyzed descriptively to identify common trends and areas of divergence. Subsequently, based on both the experts' opinions and the results of the survey, a Delphi method was employed to produce clinical practice recommendations. The questions for the Delphi process were developed by the authors leading the project, followed by a detailed discussion with the whole panel of experts. Most experts (90%) reported using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy primarily for Goligher grade II HD, with 67% extending its use to grade III cases. Preoperative bowel preparation and anesthesia use varied widely. The preferred concentration was 3% polidocanol, with 2 mL injected per hemorrhoidal pile in most cases. Post-procedural care lacked standardization, though stool softeners and flavonoids were commonly recommended. Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%). Adverse events were infrequent. The present article offers a comprehensive suite of clinical practice expert-based recommendations concerning the use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. However, there is still significant variation in its application. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize procedural strategies and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: insights from an international survey and systematic review with clinical practice recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Gaetano Gallo, Ugo Grossi, Veronica De Simone, Arcangelo Picciariello, Elia Diaco, Pin Fan, Hongbo He, Jun Li, Hongcheng Lin, Marco La Torre, Rita Laforgia, Pierluigi Lobascio, Hui Ma, Francesco Pata, Roberto Perinotti, Vincent Parades, Mauro Pozzo, Alberto Realis Luc, Paulo Salgueiro, Adam Skowronski, Pingliang Sun, Mario Trompetto, Roberta Tutino, Chen Wang, Zhenyi Wang, Zhenquan Wang, Jiong Wu, Yuru Zhang, Shipeng Zhao, Xiandong Zeng, Vitor Fernandes, Karl-Heinz Moser, Donglin Ren, Pierpaolo Sileri, Gianpiero Gravante\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02258-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). However, significant variability exists in its clinical application regarding patient selection, procedural techniques, and postoperative management. This study aimed to assess real-world practice patterns among international experts, summarize existing evidence through a systematic literature review, and develop evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to identify studies evaluating polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Additionally, an international survey was distributed to 30 experts in proctology and colorectal surgery to explore variations in indications, perioperative management, technique, and follow-up. Survey responses were analyzed descriptively to identify common trends and areas of divergence. Subsequently, based on both the experts' opinions and the results of the survey, a Delphi method was employed to produce clinical practice recommendations. The questions for the Delphi process were developed by the authors leading the project, followed by a detailed discussion with the whole panel of experts. Most experts (90%) reported using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy primarily for Goligher grade II HD, with 67% extending its use to grade III cases. Preoperative bowel preparation and anesthesia use varied widely. The preferred concentration was 3% polidocanol, with 2 mL injected per hemorrhoidal pile in most cases. Post-procedural care lacked standardization, though stool softeners and flavonoids were commonly recommended. Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%). Adverse events were infrequent. The present article offers a comprehensive suite of clinical practice expert-based recommendations concerning the use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. However, there is still significant variation in its application. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize procedural strategies and long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02258-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02258-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: insights from an international survey and systematic review with clinical practice recommendations.
Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). However, significant variability exists in its clinical application regarding patient selection, procedural techniques, and postoperative management. This study aimed to assess real-world practice patterns among international experts, summarize existing evidence through a systematic literature review, and develop evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to identify studies evaluating polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Additionally, an international survey was distributed to 30 experts in proctology and colorectal surgery to explore variations in indications, perioperative management, technique, and follow-up. Survey responses were analyzed descriptively to identify common trends and areas of divergence. Subsequently, based on both the experts' opinions and the results of the survey, a Delphi method was employed to produce clinical practice recommendations. The questions for the Delphi process were developed by the authors leading the project, followed by a detailed discussion with the whole panel of experts. Most experts (90%) reported using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy primarily for Goligher grade II HD, with 67% extending its use to grade III cases. Preoperative bowel preparation and anesthesia use varied widely. The preferred concentration was 3% polidocanol, with 2 mL injected per hemorrhoidal pile in most cases. Post-procedural care lacked standardization, though stool softeners and flavonoids were commonly recommended. Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%). Adverse events were infrequent. The present article offers a comprehensive suite of clinical practice expert-based recommendations concerning the use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. However, there is still significant variation in its application. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize procedural strategies and long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.