高剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗高危胚胎性脑肿瘤的3期随机试验:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Claire Mazewski, Sarah E S Leary, Guolian Kang, Bryan K Li, Stewart Kellie, Laura Hayes, Dennis Shaw, Ben Ho, Alyssa Reddy, Jeffrey Gossett, Peter C Burger, Alexander R Judkins, Paul Aridgides, J Russell Geyer, Amar Gajjar, Ian F Pollack, Maryam Fouladi, Annie Huang
{"title":"高剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗高危胚胎性脑肿瘤的3期随机试验:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。","authors":"Claire Mazewski, Sarah E S Leary, Guolian Kang, Bryan K Li, Stewart Kellie, Laura Hayes, Dennis Shaw, Ben Ho, Alyssa Reddy, Jeffrey Gossett, Peter C Burger, Alexander R Judkins, Paul Aridgides, J Russell Geyer, Amar Gajjar, Ian F Pollack, Maryam Fouladi, Annie Huang","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noaf132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Embryonal brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer death in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ACNS0334 was a phase 3 randomized study evaluating high-dose methotrexate in young children < 36 months old with newly diagnosed high-risk embryonal brain tumors. Treatment included three cycles of induction chemotherapy with or without methotrexate followed by three cycles of high-dose consolidation chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell infusion. Primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included comparison of event-free survival (EFS) between arms and to historical controls. Molecular characterization was conducted retrospectively. Tests of significance were one-sided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 77 eligible patients, 59 with detectable disease were evaluable for response and 28 (47.5%) achieved CR, 15/30 (50%) treated with methotrexate compared to 13/29 (45%) without methotrexate (p=0.35). For MB, CR was 12/19 (63%) with methotrexate compared to 6/20 (30%) without methotrexate (p=0.039). Considering molecular diagnosis, all SHH MB (n=11) were survivors. Five-year EFS was 70% [90% CI:39.6-87.2] for 10 Group 3 MB with methotrexate versus 33.3% [90% CI:15.0-52.9] for 15 without (p=0.037). In other embryonal tumors, CR was 3/11 (27%) with methotrexate compared to 7/9 (78%) without (p=0.99). No benefit with methotrexate was observed for Embryonal Tumor with Multilayered Rosettes (n=14, EFS 20.0% [90% CI:1.8-52.5] with methotrexate versus 33.3% [90% CI:10.8-58.1] without, p=0.58), or pineoblastoma (n=9, EFS 16.7% [90% CI:1.6-46.1] with methotrexate versus 0% without, p=0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of methotrexate to intensive chemotherapy improved CR and EFS for young children with high-risk Group 3 MB, but not other diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase 3 randomized trial of high-dose methotrexate for young children with high-risk embryonal brain tumors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Mazewski, Sarah E S Leary, Guolian Kang, Bryan K Li, Stewart Kellie, Laura Hayes, Dennis Shaw, Ben Ho, Alyssa Reddy, Jeffrey Gossett, Peter C Burger, Alexander R Judkins, Paul Aridgides, J Russell Geyer, Amar Gajjar, Ian F Pollack, Maryam Fouladi, Annie Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/neuonc/noaf132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Embryonal brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer death in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ACNS0334 was a phase 3 randomized study evaluating high-dose methotrexate in young children < 36 months old with newly diagnosed high-risk embryonal brain tumors. Treatment included three cycles of induction chemotherapy with or without methotrexate followed by three cycles of high-dose consolidation chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell infusion. Primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included comparison of event-free survival (EFS) between arms and to historical controls. Molecular characterization was conducted retrospectively. Tests of significance were one-sided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 77 eligible patients, 59 with detectable disease were evaluable for response and 28 (47.5%) achieved CR, 15/30 (50%) treated with methotrexate compared to 13/29 (45%) without methotrexate (p=0.35). For MB, CR was 12/19 (63%) with methotrexate compared to 6/20 (30%) without methotrexate (p=0.039). Considering molecular diagnosis, all SHH MB (n=11) were survivors. Five-year EFS was 70% [90% CI:39.6-87.2] for 10 Group 3 MB with methotrexate versus 33.3% [90% CI:15.0-52.9] for 15 without (p=0.037). In other embryonal tumors, CR was 3/11 (27%) with methotrexate compared to 7/9 (78%) without (p=0.99). No benefit with methotrexate was observed for Embryonal Tumor with Multilayered Rosettes (n=14, EFS 20.0% [90% CI:1.8-52.5] with methotrexate versus 33.3% [90% CI:10.8-58.1] without, p=0.58), or pineoblastoma (n=9, EFS 16.7% [90% CI:1.6-46.1] with methotrexate versus 0% without, p=0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of methotrexate to intensive chemotherapy improved CR and EFS for young children with high-risk Group 3 MB, but not other diagnoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf132\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胚胎性脑肿瘤是幼儿癌症死亡的主要原因。方法:ACNS0334是一项3期随机研究,评估大剂量甲氨蝶呤对新诊断的高危胚胎性脑肿瘤< 36个月的幼儿的治疗效果。治疗包括三个周期的诱导化疗加或不加甲氨蝶呤,然后是三个周期的高剂量巩固化疗加造血干细胞输注。主要终点是治疗结束时的完全缓解(CR)。次要终点包括两组和历史对照的无事件生存期(EFS)比较。回顾性进行分子表征。显著性检验为单侧检验。结果:在77例符合条件的患者中,59例可检测到的疾病可评估缓解,28例(47.5%)达到CR,甲氨蝶呤治疗组15/30(50%),未甲氨蝶呤治疗组13/29 (45%)(p=0.35)。对于MB,甲氨蝶呤组CR为12/19(63%),未加甲氨蝶呤组CR为6/20 (30%)(p=0.039)。考虑分子诊断,所有SHH MB (n=11)均为幸存者。3 MB组使用甲氨蝶呤的10例5年EFS为70% [90% CI:39.6-87.2],未使用甲氨蝶呤的15例为33.3% [90% CI:15.0-52.9] (p=0.037)。在其他胚胎肿瘤中,甲氨蝶呤组的CR为3/11(27%),而未使用甲氨蝶呤组的CR为7/9 (78%)(p=0.99)。甲氨蝶呤对多层莲座胚胎瘤(n=14,甲氨蝶呤治疗组EFS 20.0% [90% CI:1.8-52.5] vs无甲氨蝶呤治疗组33.3% [90% CI:10.8-58.1], p=0.58)或松果体母细胞瘤(n=9,甲氨蝶呤治疗组EFS 16.7% [90% CI:1.6-46.1] vs无甲氨蝶呤治疗组0%,p=0.52)未观察到甲氨蝶呤治疗组获益。结论:甲氨蝶呤加用强化化疗可改善高危3组MB患儿的CR和EFS,但对其他诊断无改善作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phase 3 randomized trial of high-dose methotrexate for young children with high-risk embryonal brain tumors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Background: Embryonal brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer death in young children.

Methods: ACNS0334 was a phase 3 randomized study evaluating high-dose methotrexate in young children < 36 months old with newly diagnosed high-risk embryonal brain tumors. Treatment included three cycles of induction chemotherapy with or without methotrexate followed by three cycles of high-dose consolidation chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell infusion. Primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included comparison of event-free survival (EFS) between arms and to historical controls. Molecular characterization was conducted retrospectively. Tests of significance were one-sided.

Results: Of 77 eligible patients, 59 with detectable disease were evaluable for response and 28 (47.5%) achieved CR, 15/30 (50%) treated with methotrexate compared to 13/29 (45%) without methotrexate (p=0.35). For MB, CR was 12/19 (63%) with methotrexate compared to 6/20 (30%) without methotrexate (p=0.039). Considering molecular diagnosis, all SHH MB (n=11) were survivors. Five-year EFS was 70% [90% CI:39.6-87.2] for 10 Group 3 MB with methotrexate versus 33.3% [90% CI:15.0-52.9] for 15 without (p=0.037). In other embryonal tumors, CR was 3/11 (27%) with methotrexate compared to 7/9 (78%) without (p=0.99). No benefit with methotrexate was observed for Embryonal Tumor with Multilayered Rosettes (n=14, EFS 20.0% [90% CI:1.8-52.5] with methotrexate versus 33.3% [90% CI:10.8-58.1] without, p=0.58), or pineoblastoma (n=9, EFS 16.7% [90% CI:1.6-46.1] with methotrexate versus 0% without, p=0.52).

Conclusions: The addition of methotrexate to intensive chemotherapy improved CR and EFS for young children with high-risk Group 3 MB, but not other diagnoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信