mosunetuzumab和CAR-T细胞治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤的成本效益

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Meng-Hsuan Lin, Jonathan Weiss, Tycel J Phillips, Dahlia Sano, Shannon A Carty, Ryan Wilcox, Monalisa Ghosh, Iman Ahmed, Victoria R Nachar, David Hutton, Yasmin H Karimi
{"title":"mosunetuzumab和CAR-T细胞治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤的成本效益","authors":"Meng-Hsuan Lin, Jonathan Weiss, Tycel J Phillips, Dahlia Sano, Shannon A Carty, Ryan Wilcox, Monalisa Ghosh, Iman Ahmed, Victoria R Nachar, David Hutton, Yasmin H Karimi","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2025.2506498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>T cell redirecting therapies, including mosunetuzumab (mosun), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), are FDA-approved for relapsed refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) in the 3rd line and beyond. There's no head-to-head clinical trial data to compare their effectiveness. These products differ in administration, hospitalization requirements, and toxicity profiles, impacting therapy selection. We developed a Markov model spanning one to 10 years from a US payer perspective, using parameters from clinical trials, quality utilities, and billing costs. Our base case analysis over 10 years showed that mosun provided $67,654 more Net Monetary Benefit (NMB) per patient than axi-cel and $111,709 more than tisa-cel. These findings suggest mosun is cost-effective at a $150,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost effectiveness of mosunetuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Meng-Hsuan Lin, Jonathan Weiss, Tycel J Phillips, Dahlia Sano, Shannon A Carty, Ryan Wilcox, Monalisa Ghosh, Iman Ahmed, Victoria R Nachar, David Hutton, Yasmin H Karimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428194.2025.2506498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>T cell redirecting therapies, including mosunetuzumab (mosun), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), are FDA-approved for relapsed refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) in the 3rd line and beyond. There's no head-to-head clinical trial data to compare their effectiveness. These products differ in administration, hospitalization requirements, and toxicity profiles, impacting therapy selection. We developed a Markov model spanning one to 10 years from a US payer perspective, using parameters from clinical trials, quality utilities, and billing costs. Our base case analysis over 10 years showed that mosun provided $67,654 more Net Monetary Benefit (NMB) per patient than axi-cel and $111,709 more than tisa-cel. These findings suggest mosun is cost-effective at a $150,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2506498\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2506498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

T细胞重定向疗法,包括mosunetuzumab (mosun), axicabtagene ciloleucel(轴细胞)和tisagenlecleucel(组织细胞),已被fda批准用于三线及以上的复发性难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)。没有直接的临床试验数据来比较它们的效果。这些产品在给药、住院要求和毒性方面存在差异,影响了治疗选择。我们从美国付款人的角度开发了一个跨越一到十年的马尔可夫模型,使用来自临床试验、质量公用事业和计费成本的参数。我们对10年的基本病例分析表明,mosun比axis -cel每位患者多提供67,654美元的净货币效益(NMB),比tisa-cel多111,709美元。这些发现表明,mosun在每个QALY的支付意愿为15万美元时具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost effectiveness of mosunetuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

T cell redirecting therapies, including mosunetuzumab (mosun), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), are FDA-approved for relapsed refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) in the 3rd line and beyond. There's no head-to-head clinical trial data to compare their effectiveness. These products differ in administration, hospitalization requirements, and toxicity profiles, impacting therapy selection. We developed a Markov model spanning one to 10 years from a US payer perspective, using parameters from clinical trials, quality utilities, and billing costs. Our base case analysis over 10 years showed that mosun provided $67,654 more Net Monetary Benefit (NMB) per patient than axi-cel and $111,709 more than tisa-cel. These findings suggest mosun is cost-effective at a $150,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Leukemia & Lymphoma 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
384
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信