{"title":"气体介质中超声测量系统的测量和有限元衍射校正(FEDC)的比较。","authors":"Eivind Nag Mosland, Per Lunde, Jan Kocbach","doi":"10.1121/10.0036845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diffraction corrections are essential in many ultrasonic systems utilizing one-way, two-way, and three-way measurements, or a combination thereof. Recent works have indicated that high-precision measurements may call for a diffraction correction model accounting for a full set of electrical and mechanical boundary conditions at transmission, reflection, and reception, such as the finite element diffraction correction (FEDC) model. However, the FEDC model has yet to be verified experimentally. In this work, the frequency-domain diffraction correction in an ultrasonic measurement system is measured, and compared to the FEDC model and a commonly used piston-type diffraction correction. One-way and three-way propagation are studied for an example system consisting of two piezoelectric ceramic disks in air separated by 0.10 and 0.15 m, vibrating in the frequency range of their lower radial resonances (50-300 kHz). Comparisons with measurements indicate that the FEDC model generally provides improved descriptions of diffraction effects compared to piston-type models. Specifically, mean absolute errors are decreased by 0.4-4.6 dB and 37-160° when using the FEDC model in the studied example, for magnitudes and phase angles, respectively. This shows that use of the FEDC model to correct for diffraction effects may increase the accuracy of high-precision measurement systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 6","pages":"4273-4284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of measured and finite element-based diffraction correction (FEDC) for ultrasonic measurement systems in a gaseous medium.\",\"authors\":\"Eivind Nag Mosland, Per Lunde, Jan Kocbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/10.0036845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diffraction corrections are essential in many ultrasonic systems utilizing one-way, two-way, and three-way measurements, or a combination thereof. Recent works have indicated that high-precision measurements may call for a diffraction correction model accounting for a full set of electrical and mechanical boundary conditions at transmission, reflection, and reception, such as the finite element diffraction correction (FEDC) model. However, the FEDC model has yet to be verified experimentally. In this work, the frequency-domain diffraction correction in an ultrasonic measurement system is measured, and compared to the FEDC model and a commonly used piston-type diffraction correction. One-way and three-way propagation are studied for an example system consisting of two piezoelectric ceramic disks in air separated by 0.10 and 0.15 m, vibrating in the frequency range of their lower radial resonances (50-300 kHz). Comparisons with measurements indicate that the FEDC model generally provides improved descriptions of diffraction effects compared to piston-type models. Specifically, mean absolute errors are decreased by 0.4-4.6 dB and 37-160° when using the FEDC model in the studied example, for magnitudes and phase angles, respectively. This shows that use of the FEDC model to correct for diffraction effects may increase the accuracy of high-precision measurement systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"157 6\",\"pages\":\"4273-4284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036845\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036845","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of measured and finite element-based diffraction correction (FEDC) for ultrasonic measurement systems in a gaseous medium.
Diffraction corrections are essential in many ultrasonic systems utilizing one-way, two-way, and three-way measurements, or a combination thereof. Recent works have indicated that high-precision measurements may call for a diffraction correction model accounting for a full set of electrical and mechanical boundary conditions at transmission, reflection, and reception, such as the finite element diffraction correction (FEDC) model. However, the FEDC model has yet to be verified experimentally. In this work, the frequency-domain diffraction correction in an ultrasonic measurement system is measured, and compared to the FEDC model and a commonly used piston-type diffraction correction. One-way and three-way propagation are studied for an example system consisting of two piezoelectric ceramic disks in air separated by 0.10 and 0.15 m, vibrating in the frequency range of their lower radial resonances (50-300 kHz). Comparisons with measurements indicate that the FEDC model generally provides improved descriptions of diffraction effects compared to piston-type models. Specifically, mean absolute errors are decreased by 0.4-4.6 dB and 37-160° when using the FEDC model in the studied example, for magnitudes and phase angles, respectively. This shows that use of the FEDC model to correct for diffraction effects may increase the accuracy of high-precision measurement systems.
期刊介绍:
Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.