气体介质中超声测量系统的测量和有限元衍射校正(FEDC)的比较。

IF 2.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Eivind Nag Mosland, Per Lunde, Jan Kocbach
{"title":"气体介质中超声测量系统的测量和有限元衍射校正(FEDC)的比较。","authors":"Eivind Nag Mosland, Per Lunde, Jan Kocbach","doi":"10.1121/10.0036845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diffraction corrections are essential in many ultrasonic systems utilizing one-way, two-way, and three-way measurements, or a combination thereof. Recent works have indicated that high-precision measurements may call for a diffraction correction model accounting for a full set of electrical and mechanical boundary conditions at transmission, reflection, and reception, such as the finite element diffraction correction (FEDC) model. However, the FEDC model has yet to be verified experimentally. In this work, the frequency-domain diffraction correction in an ultrasonic measurement system is measured, and compared to the FEDC model and a commonly used piston-type diffraction correction. One-way and three-way propagation are studied for an example system consisting of two piezoelectric ceramic disks in air separated by 0.10 and 0.15 m, vibrating in the frequency range of their lower radial resonances (50-300 kHz). Comparisons with measurements indicate that the FEDC model generally provides improved descriptions of diffraction effects compared to piston-type models. Specifically, mean absolute errors are decreased by 0.4-4.6 dB and 37-160° when using the FEDC model in the studied example, for magnitudes and phase angles, respectively. This shows that use of the FEDC model to correct for diffraction effects may increase the accuracy of high-precision measurement systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 6","pages":"4273-4284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of measured and finite element-based diffraction correction (FEDC) for ultrasonic measurement systems in a gaseous medium.\",\"authors\":\"Eivind Nag Mosland, Per Lunde, Jan Kocbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/10.0036845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diffraction corrections are essential in many ultrasonic systems utilizing one-way, two-way, and three-way measurements, or a combination thereof. Recent works have indicated that high-precision measurements may call for a diffraction correction model accounting for a full set of electrical and mechanical boundary conditions at transmission, reflection, and reception, such as the finite element diffraction correction (FEDC) model. However, the FEDC model has yet to be verified experimentally. In this work, the frequency-domain diffraction correction in an ultrasonic measurement system is measured, and compared to the FEDC model and a commonly used piston-type diffraction correction. One-way and three-way propagation are studied for an example system consisting of two piezoelectric ceramic disks in air separated by 0.10 and 0.15 m, vibrating in the frequency range of their lower radial resonances (50-300 kHz). Comparisons with measurements indicate that the FEDC model generally provides improved descriptions of diffraction effects compared to piston-type models. Specifically, mean absolute errors are decreased by 0.4-4.6 dB and 37-160° when using the FEDC model in the studied example, for magnitudes and phase angles, respectively. This shows that use of the FEDC model to correct for diffraction effects may increase the accuracy of high-precision measurement systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"157 6\",\"pages\":\"4273-4284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036845\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036845","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

衍射校正是必要的在许多超声波系统利用单向,双向和三向测量,或其组合。最近的研究表明,高精度测量可能需要考虑传输、反射和接收的全套电气和机械边界条件的衍射校正模型,例如有限元衍射校正(FEDC)模型。然而,FEDC模型还有待实验验证。本文对超声测量系统的频域衍射校正量进行了测量,并与FEDC模型和常用的活塞型衍射校正量进行了比较。以两个压电陶瓷片为例,在空气中以0.10和0.15 m间隔,在其较低的径向共振频率范围内(50-300 kHz)振动,研究了单向和三向传播。与实测数据的比较表明,与活塞型模型相比,FEDC模型总体上改进了对衍射效应的描述。具体而言,在研究示例中使用FEDC模型时,对于幅度和相角,平均绝对误差分别降低了0.4-4.6 dB和37-160°。这表明使用FEDC模型来校正衍射效应可以提高高精度测量系统的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of measured and finite element-based diffraction correction (FEDC) for ultrasonic measurement systems in a gaseous medium.

Diffraction corrections are essential in many ultrasonic systems utilizing one-way, two-way, and three-way measurements, or a combination thereof. Recent works have indicated that high-precision measurements may call for a diffraction correction model accounting for a full set of electrical and mechanical boundary conditions at transmission, reflection, and reception, such as the finite element diffraction correction (FEDC) model. However, the FEDC model has yet to be verified experimentally. In this work, the frequency-domain diffraction correction in an ultrasonic measurement system is measured, and compared to the FEDC model and a commonly used piston-type diffraction correction. One-way and three-way propagation are studied for an example system consisting of two piezoelectric ceramic disks in air separated by 0.10 and 0.15 m, vibrating in the frequency range of their lower radial resonances (50-300 kHz). Comparisons with measurements indicate that the FEDC model generally provides improved descriptions of diffraction effects compared to piston-type models. Specifically, mean absolute errors are decreased by 0.4-4.6 dB and 37-160° when using the FEDC model in the studied example, for magnitudes and phase angles, respectively. This shows that use of the FEDC model to correct for diffraction effects may increase the accuracy of high-precision measurement systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信