女性退伍军人在VHA护理中的盆底物理治疗经验的定性评价。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ashley C Mog, Jessica P Young, Jordan H Mamkhezri, Caroline Merkel, Kristen E Gray
{"title":"女性退伍军人在VHA护理中的盆底物理治疗经验的定性评价。","authors":"Ashley C Mog, Jessica P Young, Jordan H Mamkhezri, Caroline Merkel, Kristen E Gray","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09645-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nearly 25% of women experience pelvic floor disorders, for which pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a first-line treatment. Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), only one-third of health care systems offer PFPT on site. Alternatives include receiving care from providers in the community (\"Community Care\") or from VHA providers at a distant site via telehealth (\"Clinical Resource Hub\"). Little is known about Veterans' experiences with these two PFPT care pathways.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize women Veterans' experiences with PFPT, including factors affecting access to and receipt of care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using VHA data, we recruited and conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with women Veterans who had received PFPT services within the last 6 months.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We recruited N = 20 women Veterans from five VHA health care systems. Participants from four health care systems went through the Community Care pathway (N = 12), while participants from the fifth went through the Clinical Resource Hub (N = 8).</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We recorded and auto-transcribed semi-structured interviews. Using structured interview summaries, we completed a two-step analysis process, first using rapid, team-based matrix analysis, followed by thematic analysis. We identified key themes and domains into which we organized those themes.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We identified themes in three domains: barriers getting care, experiences of care, and barriers extending care. Veterans described barriers to receiving care initially, including a lack of knowledge, stigma, providers dismissing concerns, and referral challenges. Participants were generally satisfied with their care and experienced quality of life improvements. Most desired some in-person care. Patients wanting more care after completing initially approved visits faced additional administrative barriers, leading to symptom recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings about patient access barriers suggest provider training and education (including awareness of PFPT's clinical benefits, referral pathways, and trauma-informed care), patient education, hybrid care modalities, expansion of the PFPT provider workforce, and streamlining referrals may improve access to PFPT among Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Assessment of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Experiences for Women Veterans in VHA Care.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley C Mog, Jessica P Young, Jordan H Mamkhezri, Caroline Merkel, Kristen E Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09645-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nearly 25% of women experience pelvic floor disorders, for which pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a first-line treatment. Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), only one-third of health care systems offer PFPT on site. Alternatives include receiving care from providers in the community (\\\"Community Care\\\") or from VHA providers at a distant site via telehealth (\\\"Clinical Resource Hub\\\"). Little is known about Veterans' experiences with these two PFPT care pathways.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize women Veterans' experiences with PFPT, including factors affecting access to and receipt of care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using VHA data, we recruited and conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with women Veterans who had received PFPT services within the last 6 months.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We recruited N = 20 women Veterans from five VHA health care systems. Participants from four health care systems went through the Community Care pathway (N = 12), while participants from the fifth went through the Clinical Resource Hub (N = 8).</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We recorded and auto-transcribed semi-structured interviews. Using structured interview summaries, we completed a two-step analysis process, first using rapid, team-based matrix analysis, followed by thematic analysis. We identified key themes and domains into which we organized those themes.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We identified themes in three domains: barriers getting care, experiences of care, and barriers extending care. Veterans described barriers to receiving care initially, including a lack of knowledge, stigma, providers dismissing concerns, and referral challenges. Participants were generally satisfied with their care and experienced quality of life improvements. Most desired some in-person care. Patients wanting more care after completing initially approved visits faced additional administrative barriers, leading to symptom recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings about patient access barriers suggest provider training and education (including awareness of PFPT's clinical benefits, referral pathways, and trauma-informed care), patient education, hybrid care modalities, expansion of the PFPT provider workforce, and streamlining referrals may improve access to PFPT among Veterans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09645-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09645-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近25%的女性患有盆底疾病,盆底物理治疗(PFPT)是一线治疗方法。在退伍军人健康管理局(VHA),只有三分之一的医疗保健系统提供现场PFPT。替代方案包括接受社区提供者的护理(“社区护理”)或通过远程医疗(“临床资源中心”)从远程站点的VHA提供者处接受护理。退伍军人对这两种PFPT护理途径的经历知之甚少。目的:描述女性退伍军人PFPT的经历,包括影响获得和接受护理的因素。设计:使用VHA数据,我们招募并对在过去6个月内接受过PFPT服务的女性退伍军人进行了半结构化的定性访谈。参与者:我们从五个VHA医疗保健系统中招募了N = 20名女性退伍军人。来自四个卫生保健系统的参与者通过社区护理途径(N = 12),而来自第五个卫生保健系统的参与者通过临床资源中心(N = 8)。方法:我们记录并自动转录半结构化访谈。使用结构化的访谈摘要,我们完成了一个两步分析过程,首先使用快速的、基于团队的矩阵分析,然后是主题分析。我们确定了关键主题和领域,并将这些主题组织到其中。主要结果:我们确定了三个领域的主题:获得护理的障碍、护理的经历和延长护理的障碍。退伍军人最初描述了接受治疗的障碍,包括缺乏知识、耻辱、提供者忽视担忧和转诊挑战。参与者普遍对他们的护理感到满意,并体验到生活质量的改善。大多数人希望得到一些面对面的照顾。在完成最初批准的访问后希望得到更多护理的患者面临额外的管理障碍,导致症状复发。结论:关于患者获得障碍的研究结果表明,提供人员的培训和教育(包括PFPT的临床益处、转诊途径和创伤知情护理的认识)、患者教育、混合护理模式、扩大PFPT提供人员队伍以及简化转诊可能会改善退伍军人获得PFPT的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Qualitative Assessment of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Experiences for Women Veterans in VHA Care.

Background: Nearly 25% of women experience pelvic floor disorders, for which pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a first-line treatment. Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), only one-third of health care systems offer PFPT on site. Alternatives include receiving care from providers in the community ("Community Care") or from VHA providers at a distant site via telehealth ("Clinical Resource Hub"). Little is known about Veterans' experiences with these two PFPT care pathways.

Objective: To characterize women Veterans' experiences with PFPT, including factors affecting access to and receipt of care.

Design: Using VHA data, we recruited and conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with women Veterans who had received PFPT services within the last 6 months.

Participants: We recruited N = 20 women Veterans from five VHA health care systems. Participants from four health care systems went through the Community Care pathway (N = 12), while participants from the fifth went through the Clinical Resource Hub (N = 8).

Approach: We recorded and auto-transcribed semi-structured interviews. Using structured interview summaries, we completed a two-step analysis process, first using rapid, team-based matrix analysis, followed by thematic analysis. We identified key themes and domains into which we organized those themes.

Key results: We identified themes in three domains: barriers getting care, experiences of care, and barriers extending care. Veterans described barriers to receiving care initially, including a lack of knowledge, stigma, providers dismissing concerns, and referral challenges. Participants were generally satisfied with their care and experienced quality of life improvements. Most desired some in-person care. Patients wanting more care after completing initially approved visits faced additional administrative barriers, leading to symptom recurrence.

Conclusions: Findings about patient access barriers suggest provider training and education (including awareness of PFPT's clinical benefits, referral pathways, and trauma-informed care), patient education, hybrid care modalities, expansion of the PFPT provider workforce, and streamlining referrals may improve access to PFPT among Veterans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信