联合使用数字和模拟物理治疗的患者肌肉骨骼疾病和慢性指标:德国索赔数据分析。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Silke Frey, Annika Schmitz, Udo Schneider, Linda Kerkemeyer, Birgitta Weltermann
{"title":"联合使用数字和模拟物理治疗的患者肌肉骨骼疾病和慢性指标:德国索赔数据分析。","authors":"Silke Frey, Annika Schmitz, Udo Schneider, Linda Kerkemeyer, Birgitta Weltermann","doi":"10.2196/63935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal disorders are highly prevalent worldwide and contribute significantly to the overall burden of disease. Regular physical therapy with trained physiotherapists is recommended in the guidelines. Recently, digital physical therapy offered by digital health interventions was shown to be effective. However, the evidence on its real-world usage in health care systems is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Based on claims data, this study examined the current usage of digital health applications (DiGAs) for musculoskeletal disorders in the German health care system. Patients with standalone digital physical therapy were compared to those with a combination of analog and digital physical therapy. In addition, predictors for concomitant use were identified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed claims data from Germany's largest statutory health insurance. Patients who used DiGA for musculoskeletal disorders at least once were included. Sociodemographic and medical characteristics of patients receiving standalone and concomitant physical therapy were compared. Statistical analyses comprised univariate analyses and binomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6090 individuals, 58.2% (3543/6090) were prescribed physical therapy within 6 months before or after DiGA prescription. In this population, 36.3% (2210/6090) used DiGA and analog physical therapy at the same time. Concomitant physical therapy was significantly more likely in patients with chronicity risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.31-1.69; P<.001) or established chronicity (OR 2.76, 95% CI 2.22-3.47; P<.001), female gender (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.33-1.66; P<.001), and higher age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.02; P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight the diverse utilization patterns of DiGAs among patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Chronicity emerged as an important predictor for combined digital and analog physical therapy. These findings support considerations on integrating digital health interventions into current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":"13 ","pages":"e63935"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Use of Digital and Analog Physical Therapy in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders and Indicators of Chronicity: German Claims Data Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Silke Frey, Annika Schmitz, Udo Schneider, Linda Kerkemeyer, Birgitta Weltermann\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/63935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal disorders are highly prevalent worldwide and contribute significantly to the overall burden of disease. Regular physical therapy with trained physiotherapists is recommended in the guidelines. Recently, digital physical therapy offered by digital health interventions was shown to be effective. However, the evidence on its real-world usage in health care systems is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Based on claims data, this study examined the current usage of digital health applications (DiGAs) for musculoskeletal disorders in the German health care system. Patients with standalone digital physical therapy were compared to those with a combination of analog and digital physical therapy. In addition, predictors for concomitant use were identified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed claims data from Germany's largest statutory health insurance. Patients who used DiGA for musculoskeletal disorders at least once were included. Sociodemographic and medical characteristics of patients receiving standalone and concomitant physical therapy were compared. Statistical analyses comprised univariate analyses and binomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6090 individuals, 58.2% (3543/6090) were prescribed physical therapy within 6 months before or after DiGA prescription. In this population, 36.3% (2210/6090) used DiGA and analog physical therapy at the same time. Concomitant physical therapy was significantly more likely in patients with chronicity risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.31-1.69; P<.001) or established chronicity (OR 2.76, 95% CI 2.22-3.47; P<.001), female gender (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.33-1.66; P<.001), and higher age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.02; P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight the diverse utilization patterns of DiGAs among patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Chronicity emerged as an important predictor for combined digital and analog physical therapy. These findings support considerations on integrating digital health interventions into current guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR mHealth and uHealth\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e63935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR mHealth and uHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/63935\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌肉骨骼疾病在世界范围内非常普遍,并对疾病的总体负担做出了重大贡献。指南建议由训练有素的物理治疗师进行定期物理治疗。最近,数字健康干预措施提供的数字物理治疗被证明是有效的。然而,有关其在卫生保健系统中实际使用的证据有限。目的:基于索赔数据,本研究检查了德国卫生保健系统中肌肉骨骼疾病的数字健康应用(DiGAs)的当前使用情况。将单独进行数字物理治疗的患者与模拟和数字物理治疗相结合的患者进行比较。此外,还确定了伴随使用的预测因子。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了德国最大的法定健康保险的索赔数据。使用DiGA治疗肌肉骨骼疾病至少一次的患者被纳入研究。比较接受单独和联合物理治疗的患者的社会人口学和医学特征。统计分析包括单变量分析和二项逻辑回归。结果:6090例患者中,58.2%(3543/6090)的患者在DiGA处方前后6个月内接受了物理治疗。在该人群中,36.3%(2210/6090)同时使用DiGA和模拟物理治疗。在有慢性风险的患者中,联合物理治疗的可能性更大(优势比[OR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.31-1.69;结论:研究结果强调了diga在肌肉骨骼疾病患者中的不同使用模式。慢性成为数字和模拟物理治疗相结合的重要预测指标。这些发现支持将数字卫生干预措施纳入现行指南的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Combined Use of Digital and Analog Physical Therapy in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders and Indicators of Chronicity: German Claims Data Analysis.

Combined Use of Digital and Analog Physical Therapy in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders and Indicators of Chronicity: German Claims Data Analysis.

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders are highly prevalent worldwide and contribute significantly to the overall burden of disease. Regular physical therapy with trained physiotherapists is recommended in the guidelines. Recently, digital physical therapy offered by digital health interventions was shown to be effective. However, the evidence on its real-world usage in health care systems is limited.

Objective: Based on claims data, this study examined the current usage of digital health applications (DiGAs) for musculoskeletal disorders in the German health care system. Patients with standalone digital physical therapy were compared to those with a combination of analog and digital physical therapy. In addition, predictors for concomitant use were identified.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed claims data from Germany's largest statutory health insurance. Patients who used DiGA for musculoskeletal disorders at least once were included. Sociodemographic and medical characteristics of patients receiving standalone and concomitant physical therapy were compared. Statistical analyses comprised univariate analyses and binomial logistic regression.

Results: Of the 6090 individuals, 58.2% (3543/6090) were prescribed physical therapy within 6 months before or after DiGA prescription. In this population, 36.3% (2210/6090) used DiGA and analog physical therapy at the same time. Concomitant physical therapy was significantly more likely in patients with chronicity risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.31-1.69; P<.001) or established chronicity (OR 2.76, 95% CI 2.22-3.47; P<.001), female gender (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.33-1.66; P<.001), and higher age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.02; P<.001).

Conclusions: The findings highlight the diverse utilization patterns of DiGAs among patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Chronicity emerged as an important predictor for combined digital and analog physical therapy. These findings support considerations on integrating digital health interventions into current guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
JMIR mHealth and uHealth Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636. The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics. JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信