肺癌患者术前胸膜粘连的计算机断层扫描和正电子发射断层扫描评估。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kengo Yasuda, Masaya Yamasaki, Toho Wada, Wakako Fujiwara, Tatsuya Miyamoto, Shinji Matsui, Yasuaki Kubouchi, Yugo Tanaka
{"title":"肺癌患者术前胸膜粘连的计算机断层扫描和正电子发射断层扫描评估。","authors":"Kengo Yasuda, Masaya Yamasaki, Toho Wada, Wakako Fujiwara, Tatsuya Miyamoto, Shinji Matsui, Yasuaki Kubouchi, Yugo Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s11748-025-02169-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The presence of pleural adhesions during lung cancer surgery can obstruct the surgical field and inhibit maneuverability, thereby potentially complicating the procedure. The current study examined the potential predictive factors of pleural adhesions using standard preoperative examinations for lung cancer surgery without additional assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 542 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent chest computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography before undergoing surgery between January 2021 and September 2024. To assess differences in lung expansion between inspiration and natural breathing, the ratio of lung computed tomography scan measurements obtained during maximal inspiration-to-lung positron emission tomography measurements during spontaneous breathing was calculated. The ratios were compared between patients with pleural adhesions and those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 56 patients were classified under the adhesion group and 486 under the non-adhesion group. If the ratio of the distance from the lung base to the interlobar fissure, measured on coronal computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography, was ≤ 1.390, and the angle of the lung base, measured on sagittal computed tomography scan, was ≥ 40°, the incidence of pleural adhesions was significantly higher (24.0% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standard preoperative examinations could be effective in predicting pleural adhesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12585,"journal":{"name":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative assessment of pleural adhesions using computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography in patients with lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Kengo Yasuda, Masaya Yamasaki, Toho Wada, Wakako Fujiwara, Tatsuya Miyamoto, Shinji Matsui, Yasuaki Kubouchi, Yugo Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11748-025-02169-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The presence of pleural adhesions during lung cancer surgery can obstruct the surgical field and inhibit maneuverability, thereby potentially complicating the procedure. The current study examined the potential predictive factors of pleural adhesions using standard preoperative examinations for lung cancer surgery without additional assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 542 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent chest computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography before undergoing surgery between January 2021 and September 2024. To assess differences in lung expansion between inspiration and natural breathing, the ratio of lung computed tomography scan measurements obtained during maximal inspiration-to-lung positron emission tomography measurements during spontaneous breathing was calculated. The ratios were compared between patients with pleural adhesions and those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 56 patients were classified under the adhesion group and 486 under the non-adhesion group. If the ratio of the distance from the lung base to the interlobar fissure, measured on coronal computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography, was ≤ 1.390, and the angle of the lung base, measured on sagittal computed tomography scan, was ≥ 40°, the incidence of pleural adhesions was significantly higher (24.0% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standard preoperative examinations could be effective in predicting pleural adhesion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-025-02169-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-025-02169-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肺癌手术中胸膜粘连的存在会阻碍手术视野,抑制手术的可操作性,从而可能使手术复杂化。目前的研究在没有额外评估的情况下,使用肺癌手术的标准术前检查来检查胸膜粘连的潜在预测因素。方法:本研究纳入542例原发性肺癌患者,这些患者在2021年1月至2024年9月手术前接受了胸部计算机断层扫描和正电子发射断层扫描。为了评估吸气和自然呼吸之间肺扩张的差异,计算了自发呼吸期间最大吸气与肺正电子发射断层扫描测量所获得的肺计算机断层扫描测量值的比率。比较有胸膜粘连和无胸膜粘连患者的比率。结果:粘连组56例,非粘连组486例。冠状位计算机断层扫描和正电子发射断层扫描测量的肺基底与叶间裂的距离之比≤1.390,矢状位计算机断层扫描测量的肺基底角度≥40°,则胸膜粘连的发生率显著升高(24.0% vs. 4.7%;结论:术前标准检查可有效预测胸膜粘连。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative assessment of pleural adhesions using computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography in patients with lung cancer.

Objectives: The presence of pleural adhesions during lung cancer surgery can obstruct the surgical field and inhibit maneuverability, thereby potentially complicating the procedure. The current study examined the potential predictive factors of pleural adhesions using standard preoperative examinations for lung cancer surgery without additional assessments.

Methods: This study included 542 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent chest computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography before undergoing surgery between January 2021 and September 2024. To assess differences in lung expansion between inspiration and natural breathing, the ratio of lung computed tomography scan measurements obtained during maximal inspiration-to-lung positron emission tomography measurements during spontaneous breathing was calculated. The ratios were compared between patients with pleural adhesions and those without.

Results: In total, 56 patients were classified under the adhesion group and 486 under the non-adhesion group. If the ratio of the distance from the lung base to the interlobar fissure, measured on coronal computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography, was ≤ 1.390, and the angle of the lung base, measured on sagittal computed tomography scan, was ≥ 40°, the incidence of pleural adhesions was significantly higher (24.0% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Standard preoperative examinations could be effective in predicting pleural adhesion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: The General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is the official publication of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, the affiliated journal of The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, that publishes clinical and experimental studies in fields related to thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信