“Full-naïve”患者:甲氨蝶呤、环孢素和阿维素对治疗中重度牛皮癣一线生物制剂反应的影响——一项单中心回顾性研究

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Luca Mastorino, Paolo Dapavo, Orsola Crespi, Cristina Sarda, Eleonora Bongiovanni, Umberto Santaniello, Giuseppe Gallo, Pietro Quaglino, Simone RIbero
{"title":"“Full-naïve”患者:甲氨蝶呤、环孢素和阿维素对治疗中重度牛皮癣一线生物制剂反应的影响——一项单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Luca Mastorino, Paolo Dapavo, Orsola Crespi, Cristina Sarda, Eleonora Bongiovanni, Umberto Santaniello, Giuseppe Gallo, Pietro Quaglino, Simone RIbero","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2517082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of traditional systemic drugs to treat psoriasis (ciclosporin, methotrexate, and acitretin) in a subsequent response to biologics, has not been adequately addressed in the literature. In clinical practice it is increasingly necessary to initiate, due to concomitant comorbidities, biologics in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have not undergone prior treatment with systemics, i.e. full-naive.</p><p><strong>Objectives and methods: </strong>This study analyzed the possible impact of non-biological systemic therapies on the effectiveness and drug survival of first-line biologic drug up to 12 months in bio-naive psoriatic and PsA patients consecutively enrolled from January 2017 to March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 patients with severe psoriasis (13.5%) were full-naive. Being full-naive and having or not having undergone methotrexate or cyclosporine therapy did not impact response to subsequent years of biologic therapy. Only acitretin promotes faster response to subsequent biologic drugs with 59.6% and 74.2% of patients achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 at 16 and 28 Week, respectively, vs. 50.5% and 65% (<i>p</i> = 0.034 and 0.026). In multivariate analysis, the advantage given by acitretin was lost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Previous systemic therapy in bio-naive patients does not appear to result in a differential response to biologics during the first year of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Full-naïve\\\" patients: the impact of previous methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin on first-line biologics response in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis - a monocentric retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Mastorino, Paolo Dapavo, Orsola Crespi, Cristina Sarda, Eleonora Bongiovanni, Umberto Santaniello, Giuseppe Gallo, Pietro Quaglino, Simone RIbero\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2025.2517082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of traditional systemic drugs to treat psoriasis (ciclosporin, methotrexate, and acitretin) in a subsequent response to biologics, has not been adequately addressed in the literature. In clinical practice it is increasingly necessary to initiate, due to concomitant comorbidities, biologics in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have not undergone prior treatment with systemics, i.e. full-naive.</p><p><strong>Objectives and methods: </strong>This study analyzed the possible impact of non-biological systemic therapies on the effectiveness and drug survival of first-line biologic drug up to 12 months in bio-naive psoriatic and PsA patients consecutively enrolled from January 2017 to March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 patients with severe psoriasis (13.5%) were full-naive. Being full-naive and having or not having undergone methotrexate or cyclosporine therapy did not impact response to subsequent years of biologic therapy. Only acitretin promotes faster response to subsequent biologic drugs with 59.6% and 74.2% of patients achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 at 16 and 28 Week, respectively, vs. 50.5% and 65% (<i>p</i> = 0.034 and 0.026). In multivariate analysis, the advantage given by acitretin was lost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Previous systemic therapy in bio-naive patients does not appear to result in a differential response to biologics during the first year of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2517082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2517082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统的全身药物治疗银屑病(环孢素、甲氨蝶呤和阿维甲素)在随后的生物制剂反应中的影响,在文献中尚未得到充分的解决。在临床实践中,由于伴随的合并症,银屑病或银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者之前没有接受过系统性治疗,即全初始治疗,因此越来越有必要开始使用生物制剂。目的与方法:本研究在2017年1月至2021年3月连续入组的生物初治银屑病和PsA患者中,分析非生物全身治疗对一线生物药物疗效和12个月的药物生存期可能产生的影响。结果:重度牛皮癣95例(13.5%)为全初发型。未接受甲氨蝶呤或环孢素治疗或未接受甲氨蝶呤或环孢素治疗并不影响后续生物治疗的应答。只有阿维甲素促进对后续生物药物的更快反应,59.6%和74.2%的患者分别在16周和28周达到银屑病区域严重程度指数(PASI) 90,而50.5%和65% (p = 0.034和0.026)。在多变量分析中,阿曲维素的优势消失了。结论:在治疗的第一年,对生物初治患者进行全身治疗似乎不会导致对生物制剂的差异反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Full-naïve" patients: the impact of previous methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin on first-line biologics response in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis - a monocentric retrospective study.

Background: The impact of traditional systemic drugs to treat psoriasis (ciclosporin, methotrexate, and acitretin) in a subsequent response to biologics, has not been adequately addressed in the literature. In clinical practice it is increasingly necessary to initiate, due to concomitant comorbidities, biologics in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have not undergone prior treatment with systemics, i.e. full-naive.

Objectives and methods: This study analyzed the possible impact of non-biological systemic therapies on the effectiveness and drug survival of first-line biologic drug up to 12 months in bio-naive psoriatic and PsA patients consecutively enrolled from January 2017 to March 2021.

Results: 95 patients with severe psoriasis (13.5%) were full-naive. Being full-naive and having or not having undergone methotrexate or cyclosporine therapy did not impact response to subsequent years of biologic therapy. Only acitretin promotes faster response to subsequent biologic drugs with 59.6% and 74.2% of patients achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 at 16 and 28 Week, respectively, vs. 50.5% and 65% (p = 0.034 and 0.026). In multivariate analysis, the advantage given by acitretin was lost.

Conclusion: Previous systemic therapy in bio-naive patients does not appear to result in a differential response to biologics during the first year of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信