多种真实世界肺癌筛查队列的死亡率

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Mary E Gwin, Tanushree Prasad, Urooj Wahid, Sheena Bhalla, Song Zhang, Jessica L Lee, David H Johnson, George Oliver, Lauren Vice, Cornelia Tan, Cynthia Watkins, David E Gerber
{"title":"多种真实世界肺癌筛查队列的死亡率","authors":"Mary E Gwin, Tanushree Prasad, Urooj Wahid, Sheena Bhalla, Song Zhang, Jessica L Lee, David H Johnson, George Oliver, Lauren Vice, Cornelia Tan, Cynthia Watkins, David E Gerber","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer screening (LCS) is indicated exclusively for older individuals with substantial tobacco use, a risk factor not only for lung cancer but also for other malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Because LCS trial populations are commonly regarded as healthier than the broader LCS-eligible population, the real-world mortality rate among individuals undergoing LCS represents a key consideration in LCS implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study of individuals for whom LCS was ordered between March 2017 and December 2022 in an integrated safety-net healthcare system. Demographic characteristics and Charlson comorbidity index were obtained from the medical record. Dates and causes of death were captured from the medical record and National Death Index. We compared mortality according to patient characteristics using Cox proportional hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1598 patients (mean age 62 years, 43% female, 45% Black, 18% Hispanic) were included in the analysis, of whom 60% had moderate and 20% severe comorbidity; 91% of patients were current smokers. With a median follow-up of 31.3 months, 93 patients (6%) had died. For patients without a date of death, 55% had an encounter in the healthcare system within 3 months of data collection. Mortality was significantly associated with age (HR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P = .01), but not with patient sex, race, comorbidity, smoking status, or LCS completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite substantial comorbidity burden, short-term mortality is low in a diverse, real-world LCS population, suggesting potential for benefit from screening and early detection of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality in a Diverse, Real-World Lung Cancer Screening Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Mary E Gwin, Tanushree Prasad, Urooj Wahid, Sheena Bhalla, Song Zhang, Jessica L Lee, David H Johnson, George Oliver, Lauren Vice, Cornelia Tan, Cynthia Watkins, David E Gerber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer screening (LCS) is indicated exclusively for older individuals with substantial tobacco use, a risk factor not only for lung cancer but also for other malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Because LCS trial populations are commonly regarded as healthier than the broader LCS-eligible population, the real-world mortality rate among individuals undergoing LCS represents a key consideration in LCS implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study of individuals for whom LCS was ordered between March 2017 and December 2022 in an integrated safety-net healthcare system. Demographic characteristics and Charlson comorbidity index were obtained from the medical record. Dates and causes of death were captured from the medical record and National Death Index. We compared mortality according to patient characteristics using Cox proportional hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1598 patients (mean age 62 years, 43% female, 45% Black, 18% Hispanic) were included in the analysis, of whom 60% had moderate and 20% severe comorbidity; 91% of patients were current smokers. With a median follow-up of 31.3 months, 93 patients (6%) had died. For patients without a date of death, 55% had an encounter in the healthcare system within 3 months of data collection. Mortality was significantly associated with age (HR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P = .01), but not with patient sex, race, comorbidity, smoking status, or LCS completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite substantial comorbidity burden, short-term mortality is low in a diverse, real-world LCS population, suggesting potential for benefit from screening and early detection of lung cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺癌筛查(LCS)专门针对大量吸烟的老年人,吸烟不仅是肺癌的危险因素,也是其他恶性肿瘤、心血管疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的危险因素。由于LCS试验人群通常被认为比更广泛的LCS合格人群更健康,因此LCS患者的实际死亡率是LCS实施的关键考虑因素。方法:我们对2017年3月至2022年12月在综合安全网医疗保健系统中订购LCS的个体进行了回顾性观察性队列研究。从病历中获得人口统计学特征和Charlson合并症指数。死亡日期和原因从医疗记录和国家死亡指数中获取。我们根据患者特征使用Cox比例风险比比较死亡率。结果:共纳入1598例患者(平均年龄62岁,女性43%,黑人45%,西班牙裔18%),其中60%有中度合并症,20%有重度合并症;91%的患者目前是吸烟者。中位随访31.3个月,93例(6%)患者死亡。对于没有死亡日期的患者,55%的患者在数据收集后3个月内曾在医疗保健系统中就诊。死亡率与年龄显著相关(HR 1.06;95% ci, 1.02-1.11;P = 0.01),但与患者性别、种族、合并症、吸烟状况或LCS完成情况无关。结论:尽管存在严重的合并症负担,但在多样化的LCS人群中,短期死亡率很低,这表明肺癌筛查和早期检测可能会带来益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mortality in a Diverse, Real-World Lung Cancer Screening Cohort.

Background: Lung cancer screening (LCS) is indicated exclusively for older individuals with substantial tobacco use, a risk factor not only for lung cancer but also for other malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Because LCS trial populations are commonly regarded as healthier than the broader LCS-eligible population, the real-world mortality rate among individuals undergoing LCS represents a key consideration in LCS implementation.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study of individuals for whom LCS was ordered between March 2017 and December 2022 in an integrated safety-net healthcare system. Demographic characteristics and Charlson comorbidity index were obtained from the medical record. Dates and causes of death were captured from the medical record and National Death Index. We compared mortality according to patient characteristics using Cox proportional hazard ratios.

Results: A total of 1598 patients (mean age 62 years, 43% female, 45% Black, 18% Hispanic) were included in the analysis, of whom 60% had moderate and 20% severe comorbidity; 91% of patients were current smokers. With a median follow-up of 31.3 months, 93 patients (6%) had died. For patients without a date of death, 55% had an encounter in the healthcare system within 3 months of data collection. Mortality was significantly associated with age (HR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P = .01), but not with patient sex, race, comorbidity, smoking status, or LCS completion.

Conclusions: Despite substantial comorbidity burden, short-term mortality is low in a diverse, real-world LCS population, suggesting potential for benefit from screening and early detection of lung cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信