基于手表的血压监测装置在日常血压监测中的可行性。

IF 3.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-06-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5646/ch.2025.31.e21
Youngro Lee, Sungjoon Park, Jongae Park, Jongmo Seo, Hae-Young Lee
{"title":"基于手表的血压监测装置在日常血压监测中的可行性。","authors":"Youngro Lee, Sungjoon Park, Jongae Park, Jongmo Seo, Hae-Young Lee","doi":"10.5646/ch.2025.31.e21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement devices integrated into smartwatches have gained prominence, yet limited studies provide the feasibility and preciseness of daily BP monitoring. Here, we evaluated the trackability of daily BP variance and the precision of the calibration process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected the data from 896 participants, reporting 35,592 BP values, and body composition analysis data measured by the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 device. Participants were instructed to measure BP daily, in the morning (5 AM-9 AM) and evening (6 PM-10 PM) for 2 weeks, with initial calibration and re-calibration after the first week. Body composition data, obtained using the Galaxy Watch's bioelectrical impedance analysis sensor, was measured voluntarily during the campaign without specific time constraints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With BP readings collected using smartwatches, morning and evening BP values showed a significant difference, higher in the evening by 1.42 ± 5.25 mmHg (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Basal metabolic rate, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, morning systolic BP, morning pulse pressure, and morning heart rate were significantly associated with higher difference in morning-evening BP. The calibration stability was assessed by the difference in average BP before and after calibration, showing a substantial pre-post calibration BP difference by 4.64 ± 4.73 mmHg of systolic BP and 3.66 ± 3.62 mmHg of diastolic BP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, watch-based devices may not detect clinical-level BP variability, and substantial extent of pre-post calibration error has to be solved for their utility in regular real-life BP monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":10480,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hypertension","volume":"31 ","pages":"e21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of watch-based blood pressure monitoring device in daily blood pressure monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Youngro Lee, Sungjoon Park, Jongae Park, Jongmo Seo, Hae-Young Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5646/ch.2025.31.e21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement devices integrated into smartwatches have gained prominence, yet limited studies provide the feasibility and preciseness of daily BP monitoring. Here, we evaluated the trackability of daily BP variance and the precision of the calibration process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected the data from 896 participants, reporting 35,592 BP values, and body composition analysis data measured by the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 device. Participants were instructed to measure BP daily, in the morning (5 AM-9 AM) and evening (6 PM-10 PM) for 2 weeks, with initial calibration and re-calibration after the first week. Body composition data, obtained using the Galaxy Watch's bioelectrical impedance analysis sensor, was measured voluntarily during the campaign without specific time constraints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With BP readings collected using smartwatches, morning and evening BP values showed a significant difference, higher in the evening by 1.42 ± 5.25 mmHg (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Basal metabolic rate, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, morning systolic BP, morning pulse pressure, and morning heart rate were significantly associated with higher difference in morning-evening BP. The calibration stability was assessed by the difference in average BP before and after calibration, showing a substantial pre-post calibration BP difference by 4.64 ± 4.73 mmHg of systolic BP and 3.66 ± 3.62 mmHg of diastolic BP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, watch-based devices may not detect clinical-level BP variability, and substantial extent of pre-post calibration error has to be solved for their utility in regular real-life BP monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"e21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5646/ch.2025.31.e21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5646/ch.2025.31.e21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:集成到智能手表中的无袖带血压(BP)测量设备已经得到了重视,但有限的研究提供了日常血压监测的可行性和准确性。在这里,我们评估了每日BP方差的可跟踪性和校准过程的精度。方法:我们收集了896名参与者的数据,报告了35,592个BP值,并通过三星Galaxy Watch 6设备测量了身体成分分析数据。参与者被要求每天在早上(上午5点至9点)和晚上(下午6点至10点)测量血压,持续2周,第一周后进行首次校准和重新校准。使用Galaxy Watch的生物电阻抗分析传感器获得的身体成分数据是在活动期间自愿测量的,没有特定的时间限制。结果:使用智能手表采集血压数据,早上和晚上的血压值有显著差异,晚上的血压值高1.42±5.25 mmHg (P < 0.05)。基础代谢率、骨骼肌质量、全身水分、晨间收缩压、晨间脉压和晨间心率与早晚血压差异显著相关。通过校准前后的平均血压差异来评估校准的稳定性,显示校准前后的血压差异显著,收缩压为4.64±4.73 mmHg,舒张压为3.66±3.62 mmHg。结论:总之,基于手表的设备可能无法检测到临床水平的血压变异性,并且必须解决大量的前后校准误差,以使其在日常生活中的血压监测中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of watch-based blood pressure monitoring device in daily blood pressure monitoring.

Background: Cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement devices integrated into smartwatches have gained prominence, yet limited studies provide the feasibility and preciseness of daily BP monitoring. Here, we evaluated the trackability of daily BP variance and the precision of the calibration process.

Methods: We collected the data from 896 participants, reporting 35,592 BP values, and body composition analysis data measured by the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 device. Participants were instructed to measure BP daily, in the morning (5 AM-9 AM) and evening (6 PM-10 PM) for 2 weeks, with initial calibration and re-calibration after the first week. Body composition data, obtained using the Galaxy Watch's bioelectrical impedance analysis sensor, was measured voluntarily during the campaign without specific time constraints.

Results: With BP readings collected using smartwatches, morning and evening BP values showed a significant difference, higher in the evening by 1.42 ± 5.25 mmHg (P < 0.05). Basal metabolic rate, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, morning systolic BP, morning pulse pressure, and morning heart rate were significantly associated with higher difference in morning-evening BP. The calibration stability was assessed by the difference in average BP before and after calibration, showing a substantial pre-post calibration BP difference by 4.64 ± 4.73 mmHg of systolic BP and 3.66 ± 3.62 mmHg of diastolic BP.

Conclusions: In conclusion, watch-based devices may not detect clinical-level BP variability, and substantial extent of pre-post calibration error has to be solved for their utility in regular real-life BP monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Hypertension
Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信