Hye-Bin Kim, Ah-Ran Oh, Jungchan Park, Heezoo Kim, Hyo Sung Kim, Dong Ju Lee, In Jung Kim, Jaeyeon Chung, Youn Joung Cho, Yunseok Jeon, Jae-Woo Ju, Karam Nam
{"title":"sugammadex、新斯的明或吡地斯的明用于神经肌肉阻滞逆转与术后心动过缓的关联:一项多中心、回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Hye-Bin Kim, Ah-Ran Oh, Jungchan Park, Heezoo Kim, Hyo Sung Kim, Dong Ju Lee, In Jung Kim, Jaeyeon Chung, Youn Joung Cho, Yunseok Jeon, Jae-Woo Ju, Karam Nam","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of bradycardia after sugammadex administration for reversal of neuromuscular block compared with neostigmine and pyridostigmine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre retrospective observational study included adult patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia between 2011 and 2021 in three university hospitals in Korea. The risk of bradycardia, defined as relative (≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30%, or ≥40%) or absolute (≥5, ≥10, ≥15, or ≥20 beats min<sup>-1</sup>) decreases in heart rate (HR) from baseline within 30 min after the administration of sugammadex, neostigmine, or pyridostigmine was compared using logistic regression with stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 359 414 patients were analysed; sugammadex, neostigmine, and pyridostigmine were administered in 107 018, 97 754, and 154 642 patients, respectively. The overall incidence of bradycardia in the sugammadex group was similar to that of the neostigmine group. Specifically, the risk of a ≥20% decrease in HR was not significantly different between the sugammadex and neostigmine groups (9.8% vs 10.2%; odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.00 [0.97-1.03]), though it was significantly higher in the sugammadex group than in the pyridostigmine group (9.8% vs 5.8%; 1.93 [1.87-1.98]). Restricted cubic spline curves suggested a linear increase in the risk of a ≥20% decrease in HR as the dose of sugammadex increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of bradycardia after sugammadex administration was low, and its adjusted risk was not significantly different from that of neostigmine, the most commonly used acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for reversal of neuromuscular block.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of sugammadex, neostigmine, or pyridostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block with postoperative bradycardia: a multicentre, retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Hye-Bin Kim, Ah-Ran Oh, Jungchan Park, Heezoo Kim, Hyo Sung Kim, Dong Ju Lee, In Jung Kim, Jaeyeon Chung, Youn Joung Cho, Yunseok Jeon, Jae-Woo Ju, Karam Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of bradycardia after sugammadex administration for reversal of neuromuscular block compared with neostigmine and pyridostigmine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre retrospective observational study included adult patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia between 2011 and 2021 in three university hospitals in Korea. The risk of bradycardia, defined as relative (≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30%, or ≥40%) or absolute (≥5, ≥10, ≥15, or ≥20 beats min<sup>-1</sup>) decreases in heart rate (HR) from baseline within 30 min after the administration of sugammadex, neostigmine, or pyridostigmine was compared using logistic regression with stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 359 414 patients were analysed; sugammadex, neostigmine, and pyridostigmine were administered in 107 018, 97 754, and 154 642 patients, respectively. The overall incidence of bradycardia in the sugammadex group was similar to that of the neostigmine group. Specifically, the risk of a ≥20% decrease in HR was not significantly different between the sugammadex and neostigmine groups (9.8% vs 10.2%; odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.00 [0.97-1.03]), though it was significantly higher in the sugammadex group than in the pyridostigmine group (9.8% vs 5.8%; 1.93 [1.87-1.98]). Restricted cubic spline curves suggested a linear increase in the risk of a ≥20% decrease in HR as the dose of sugammadex increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of bradycardia after sugammadex administration was low, and its adjusted risk was not significantly different from that of neostigmine, the most commonly used acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for reversal of neuromuscular block.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究的目的是评估与新斯的明和吡地斯的明相比,使用糖麦酮逆转神经肌肉阻滞后发生心动过缓的风险。方法:这项多中心回顾性观察性研究纳入了2011年至2021年间在韩国三所大学医院接受全身麻醉手术的成年患者。心动过缓的风险,定义为相对(≥10%,≥20%,≥30%,或≥40%)或绝对(≥5次,≥10次,≥15次,或≥20次min-1)在给药后30分钟内心率(HR)较基线降低,使用具有稳定的治疗加权逆概率的logistic回归进行比较。结果:共分析359 414例患者;分别有107 018例、97 754例和154 642例患者使用了Sugammadex、新斯的明和吡啶斯的明。糖马德组的心动过缓的总发生率与新斯的明组相似。具体来说,甘马德和新斯的明组HR降低≥20%的风险没有显著差异(9.8% vs 10.2%;优势比[95%可信区间]:1.00[0.97-1.03]),但糖胺酮组明显高于吡哆斯的明组(9.8% vs 5.8%;1.93(1.87 - -1.98))。受限三次样条曲线显示,随着糖madex剂量的增加,HR降低≥20%的风险呈线性增加。结论:糖马德给药后心动过缓的发生率较低,其校正风险与逆转神经肌肉阻滞最常用的乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂新斯的明无显著差异。
Association of sugammadex, neostigmine, or pyridostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block with postoperative bradycardia: a multicentre, retrospective observational study.
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of bradycardia after sugammadex administration for reversal of neuromuscular block compared with neostigmine and pyridostigmine.
Methods: This multicentre retrospective observational study included adult patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia between 2011 and 2021 in three university hospitals in Korea. The risk of bradycardia, defined as relative (≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30%, or ≥40%) or absolute (≥5, ≥10, ≥15, or ≥20 beats min-1) decreases in heart rate (HR) from baseline within 30 min after the administration of sugammadex, neostigmine, or pyridostigmine was compared using logistic regression with stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Results: A total of 359 414 patients were analysed; sugammadex, neostigmine, and pyridostigmine were administered in 107 018, 97 754, and 154 642 patients, respectively. The overall incidence of bradycardia in the sugammadex group was similar to that of the neostigmine group. Specifically, the risk of a ≥20% decrease in HR was not significantly different between the sugammadex and neostigmine groups (9.8% vs 10.2%; odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.00 [0.97-1.03]), though it was significantly higher in the sugammadex group than in the pyridostigmine group (9.8% vs 5.8%; 1.93 [1.87-1.98]). Restricted cubic spline curves suggested a linear increase in the risk of a ≥20% decrease in HR as the dose of sugammadex increased.
Conclusions: The incidence of bradycardia after sugammadex administration was low, and its adjusted risk was not significantly different from that of neostigmine, the most commonly used acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for reversal of neuromuscular block.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.