口服全身皮质类固醇治疗急性哮喘患儿:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Shunsuke Amagasa, Shu Utsumi, Kie Okajima, Satoko Uematsu
{"title":"口服全身皮质类固醇治疗急性哮喘患儿:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Shunsuke Amagasa, Shu Utsumi, Kie Okajima, Satoko Uematsu","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy differentials among corticosteroid regimens by type, dosage and duration, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched four databases from their inception to March 2024 and included RCTs that evaluated oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations in young people aged <21 years. We compared six regimens (dexamethasone (DEXA) 0.3 mg/kg/day administered for 1 day, DEXA 0.6 mg/kg/day for 1 day, DEXA 0.6 mg/kg/day for 2 days, prednisolone (PSL) 1.0 mg/kg/day for 3 days, PSL 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day for 5 days and PSL 2.0 mg/kg/day for 5 days). Primary outcome was relapse within 14 days, defined as unplanned visit to an emergency department or primary care physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies involving 2353 patients were analysed in our quantitative synthesis. There were no significant differences in the relapse rates among 15 comparisons of six regimens. As part of the results, the network estimate showed that DEXA (0.3 mg/kg/day×1 day) compared with PSL (1.0 mg/kg/day for 3 days) had a risk ratio (RR) of 0.99 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.74), and DEXA (0.6 mg/kg/day for 2 days) compared with PSL (1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day×5 days) had an RR of 1.29 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.98). The certainty of the evidence for the included comparisons was low to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this network meta-analysis, there were no significant differences in the efficacy of commonly used corticosteroid regimens for acute exacerbations in childhood asthma. Short-term oral DEXA may be an acceptable alternative to a longer course of PSL.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD 42023449189.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":"824-831"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral systemic corticosteroids in children with acute asthma exacerbations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shunsuke Amagasa, Shu Utsumi, Kie Okajima, Satoko Uematsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy differentials among corticosteroid regimens by type, dosage and duration, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched four databases from their inception to March 2024 and included RCTs that evaluated oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations in young people aged <21 years. We compared six regimens (dexamethasone (DEXA) 0.3 mg/kg/day administered for 1 day, DEXA 0.6 mg/kg/day for 1 day, DEXA 0.6 mg/kg/day for 2 days, prednisolone (PSL) 1.0 mg/kg/day for 3 days, PSL 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day for 5 days and PSL 2.0 mg/kg/day for 5 days). Primary outcome was relapse within 14 days, defined as unplanned visit to an emergency department or primary care physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies involving 2353 patients were analysed in our quantitative synthesis. There were no significant differences in the relapse rates among 15 comparisons of six regimens. As part of the results, the network estimate showed that DEXA (0.3 mg/kg/day×1 day) compared with PSL (1.0 mg/kg/day for 3 days) had a risk ratio (RR) of 0.99 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.74), and DEXA (0.6 mg/kg/day for 2 days) compared with PSL (1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day×5 days) had an RR of 1.29 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.98). The certainty of the evidence for the included comparisons was low to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this network meta-analysis, there were no significant differences in the efficacy of commonly used corticosteroid regimens for acute exacerbations in childhood asthma. Short-term oral DEXA may be an acceptable alternative to a longer course of PSL.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD 42023449189.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"824-831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327523\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了评估不同类型、剂量和持续时间的皮质类固醇治疗方案的疗效差异,我们对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。方法:我们检索了4个数据库,从建立到2024年3月,纳入了评估口服皮质类固醇治疗年轻人哮喘加重的随机对照试验。结果:我们的定量合成分析了11项研究,涉及2353例患者。6个方案的15个比较的复发率无显著差异。作为结果的一部分,网络估计显示DEXA (0.3 mg/kg/day×1 day)与PSL (1.0 mg/kg/day,持续3天)的风险比(RR)为0.99 (95% CI 0.56 - 1.74), DEXA (0.6 mg/kg/day,持续2天)与PSL (1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day×5 day)的风险比(RR)为1.29 (95% CI 0.84 - 1.98)。纳入比较的证据的确定性从低到非常低。结论:在这项网络荟萃分析中,常用皮质类固醇治疗儿童哮喘急性加重的疗效无显著差异。短期口服DEXA可能是较长疗程PSL的可接受替代方案。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD 42023449189。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral systemic corticosteroids in children with acute asthma exacerbations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy differentials among corticosteroid regimens by type, dosage and duration, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: We searched four databases from their inception to March 2024 and included RCTs that evaluated oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations in young people aged <21 years. We compared six regimens (dexamethasone (DEXA) 0.3 mg/kg/day administered for 1 day, DEXA 0.6 mg/kg/day for 1 day, DEXA 0.6 mg/kg/day for 2 days, prednisolone (PSL) 1.0 mg/kg/day for 3 days, PSL 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day for 5 days and PSL 2.0 mg/kg/day for 5 days). Primary outcome was relapse within 14 days, defined as unplanned visit to an emergency department or primary care physician.

Results: Eleven studies involving 2353 patients were analysed in our quantitative synthesis. There were no significant differences in the relapse rates among 15 comparisons of six regimens. As part of the results, the network estimate showed that DEXA (0.3 mg/kg/day×1 day) compared with PSL (1.0 mg/kg/day for 3 days) had a risk ratio (RR) of 0.99 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.74), and DEXA (0.6 mg/kg/day for 2 days) compared with PSL (1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day×5 days) had an RR of 1.29 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.98). The certainty of the evidence for the included comparisons was low to very low.

Conclusion: In this network meta-analysis, there were no significant differences in the efficacy of commonly used corticosteroid regimens for acute exacerbations in childhood asthma. Short-term oral DEXA may be an acceptable alternative to a longer course of PSL.

Prospero registration number: CRD 42023449189.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信