血浆生物标志物用于阿尔茨海默病的早期检测:日本队列的横断面研究

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Masahito Kubota, Shogyoku Bun, Keisuke Takahata, Shin Kurose, Yuki Momota, Yu Iwabuchi, Toshiki Tezuka, Hajime Tabuchi, Morinobu Seki, Yasuharu Yamamoto, Ryo Shikimoto, Yu Mimura, Takayuki Hoshino, Sho Shimohama, Natsumi Suzuki, Ayaka Morimoto, Azusa Oosumi, Yuka Hoshino, Kenji Tai, Hirofumi Aoyagi, Yoshiaki Sato, Junro Kuromitsu, Jin Nakahara, Masaru Mimura, Daisuke Ito
{"title":"血浆生物标志物用于阿尔茨海默病的早期检测:日本队列的横断面研究","authors":"Masahito Kubota, Shogyoku Bun, Keisuke Takahata, Shin Kurose, Yuki Momota, Yu Iwabuchi, Toshiki Tezuka, Hajime Tabuchi, Morinobu Seki, Yasuharu Yamamoto, Ryo Shikimoto, Yu Mimura, Takayuki Hoshino, Sho Shimohama, Natsumi Suzuki, Ayaka Morimoto, Azusa Oosumi, Yuka Hoshino, Kenji Tai, Hirofumi Aoyagi, Yoshiaki Sato, Junro Kuromitsu, Jin Nakahara, Masaru Mimura, Daisuke Ito","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01778-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma biomarkers offer a promising alternative to amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD). This cross-sectional study assessed the utility of multiple plasma biomarkers for diagnosing and staging AD in a Japanese cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessed plasma biomarkers included Aβ42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau181 and p-tau217), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL), individually and in combination. Aβ42/40 was measured using the HISCL<sup>®</sup> platform, while all other biomarkers were measured using the Simoa<sup>®</sup> platform. Participants were classified based on Aβ PET imaging and neuropsychological testing into healthy controls (HC), AD continuum (preclinical AD, mild cognitive impairment [AD-MCI], and mild dementia [AD-D]), and non-AD cognitive impairment (CI) groups. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to predict the Aβ PET status, correlation with Centiloid (CL) values and cognitive scores, and biomarker comparisons across AD stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine HC, 13 preclinical AD, 38 AD-MCI, 44 AD-D, and 79 non-AD CI participants were included. The area under the curves (AUCs) for predicting Aβ PET status were 0.937 (Aβ42/40), 0.926 (p-tau217), and 0.946 (p-tau217/Aβ42); results of pair-wise DeLong tests revealed no significant differences among these three metrics (all p > 0.05). In the cognitively normal group, the AUCs were 0.968 (Aβ42/40), 0.958 (p-tau217), and 0.979 (p-tau217/Aβ42), while in the cognitively impaired group, they were 0.919 (Aβ42/40), 0.893 (p-tau217), and 0.923 (p-tau217/Aβ42). Among HC and AD continuum participants, CL correlations were - 0.74 (Aβ42/40), 0.81 (p-tau217), and 0.83 (p-tau217/Aβ42). In the HC and AD continuum, Aβ42/40 levels showed a bimodal distribution (cutoff = 0.096), with a shift from high to low occurring at 19.3 CL, compared to the PET positivity threshold of 32.9 CL. P-tau217 exhibited a linear increase with disease progression. All biomarkers correlated strongly with logical memory scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Plasma biomarkers, Aβ42/40 and p-tau217, and particularly their ratio (p-tau217/Aβ42), show strong potential as Aβ PET alternatives for AD diagnosis. HISCL-based plasma Aβ42/40 detects Aβ accumulation earlier than Aβ PET visual reading threshold, underscoring its utility as an early diagnostic marker.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma biomarkers for early detection of alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study in a Japanese cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Masahito Kubota, Shogyoku Bun, Keisuke Takahata, Shin Kurose, Yuki Momota, Yu Iwabuchi, Toshiki Tezuka, Hajime Tabuchi, Morinobu Seki, Yasuharu Yamamoto, Ryo Shikimoto, Yu Mimura, Takayuki Hoshino, Sho Shimohama, Natsumi Suzuki, Ayaka Morimoto, Azusa Oosumi, Yuka Hoshino, Kenji Tai, Hirofumi Aoyagi, Yoshiaki Sato, Junro Kuromitsu, Jin Nakahara, Masaru Mimura, Daisuke Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13195-025-01778-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma biomarkers offer a promising alternative to amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD). This cross-sectional study assessed the utility of multiple plasma biomarkers for diagnosing and staging AD in a Japanese cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessed plasma biomarkers included Aβ42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau181 and p-tau217), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL), individually and in combination. Aβ42/40 was measured using the HISCL<sup>®</sup> platform, while all other biomarkers were measured using the Simoa<sup>®</sup> platform. Participants were classified based on Aβ PET imaging and neuropsychological testing into healthy controls (HC), AD continuum (preclinical AD, mild cognitive impairment [AD-MCI], and mild dementia [AD-D]), and non-AD cognitive impairment (CI) groups. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to predict the Aβ PET status, correlation with Centiloid (CL) values and cognitive scores, and biomarker comparisons across AD stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine HC, 13 preclinical AD, 38 AD-MCI, 44 AD-D, and 79 non-AD CI participants were included. The area under the curves (AUCs) for predicting Aβ PET status were 0.937 (Aβ42/40), 0.926 (p-tau217), and 0.946 (p-tau217/Aβ42); results of pair-wise DeLong tests revealed no significant differences among these three metrics (all p > 0.05). In the cognitively normal group, the AUCs were 0.968 (Aβ42/40), 0.958 (p-tau217), and 0.979 (p-tau217/Aβ42), while in the cognitively impaired group, they were 0.919 (Aβ42/40), 0.893 (p-tau217), and 0.923 (p-tau217/Aβ42). Among HC and AD continuum participants, CL correlations were - 0.74 (Aβ42/40), 0.81 (p-tau217), and 0.83 (p-tau217/Aβ42). In the HC and AD continuum, Aβ42/40 levels showed a bimodal distribution (cutoff = 0.096), with a shift from high to low occurring at 19.3 CL, compared to the PET positivity threshold of 32.9 CL. P-tau217 exhibited a linear increase with disease progression. All biomarkers correlated strongly with logical memory scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Plasma biomarkers, Aβ42/40 and p-tau217, and particularly their ratio (p-tau217/Aβ42), show strong potential as Aβ PET alternatives for AD diagnosis. HISCL-based plasma Aβ42/40 detects Aβ accumulation earlier than Aβ PET visual reading threshold, underscoring its utility as an early diagnostic marker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144780/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01778-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01778-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血浆生物标志物为诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD)提供了一个有希望的替代淀粉样蛋白β (a β)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)或脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物。本横断面研究评估了日本队列中多种血浆生物标志物在AD诊断和分期中的应用。方法:评估血浆生物标志物包括Aβ42/40,磷酸化tau (p-tau181和p-tau217),胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和神经丝轻链(NfL),单独或联合使用。使用HISCL®平台测量Aβ42/40,而使用Simoa®平台测量所有其他生物标志物。参与者根据Aβ PET成像和神经心理测试分为健康对照组(HC)、AD连续体(临床前AD、轻度认知障碍[AD- mci]和轻度痴呆[AD- d])和非AD认知障碍(CI)组。进行受试者工作特征分析以预测Aβ PET状态、与Centiloid (CL)值和认知评分的相关性以及AD分期的生物标志物比较。结果:69名HC、13名临床前AD、38名AD- mci、44名AD- d和79名非AD CI参与者被纳入研究。预测Aβ PET状态的曲线下面积(aus)分别为0.937 (a - β42/40)、0.926 (p-tau217)和0.946 (p-tau217/ a - β42);两两DeLong检验结果显示这三个指标之间无显著差异(均p < 0.05)。认知正常组的auc分别为0.968 (a - β42/40)、0.958 (p-tau217)、0.979 (p-tau217/ a - β42),认知障碍组的auc分别为0.919 (a - β42/40)、0.893 (p-tau217)、0.923 (p-tau217/ a - β42)。在HC和AD连续体参与者中,CL相关性分别为- 0.74 (a - β42/40)、0.81 (p-tau217)和0.83 (p-tau217/ a - β42)。在HC和AD连续体中,a β42/40水平呈双峰分布(截止值= 0.096),在19.3 CL时出现由高到低的变化,而PET阳性阈值为32.9 CL。P-tau217随疾病进展呈线性增加。所有的生物标记都与逻辑记忆得分密切相关。结论:血浆生物标志物Aβ42/40和p-tau217,特别是它们的比值(p-tau217/ a - β42),显示出作为Aβ PET诊断AD的强大潜力。基于hiscl的血浆Aβ42/40检测到Aβ积累早于Aβ PET视觉读数阈值,强调其作为早期诊断标志物的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plasma biomarkers for early detection of alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study in a Japanese cohort.

Background: Plasma biomarkers offer a promising alternative to amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD). This cross-sectional study assessed the utility of multiple plasma biomarkers for diagnosing and staging AD in a Japanese cohort.

Methods: The assessed plasma biomarkers included Aβ42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau181 and p-tau217), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL), individually and in combination. Aβ42/40 was measured using the HISCL® platform, while all other biomarkers were measured using the Simoa® platform. Participants were classified based on Aβ PET imaging and neuropsychological testing into healthy controls (HC), AD continuum (preclinical AD, mild cognitive impairment [AD-MCI], and mild dementia [AD-D]), and non-AD cognitive impairment (CI) groups. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to predict the Aβ PET status, correlation with Centiloid (CL) values and cognitive scores, and biomarker comparisons across AD stages.

Results: Sixty-nine HC, 13 preclinical AD, 38 AD-MCI, 44 AD-D, and 79 non-AD CI participants were included. The area under the curves (AUCs) for predicting Aβ PET status were 0.937 (Aβ42/40), 0.926 (p-tau217), and 0.946 (p-tau217/Aβ42); results of pair-wise DeLong tests revealed no significant differences among these three metrics (all p > 0.05). In the cognitively normal group, the AUCs were 0.968 (Aβ42/40), 0.958 (p-tau217), and 0.979 (p-tau217/Aβ42), while in the cognitively impaired group, they were 0.919 (Aβ42/40), 0.893 (p-tau217), and 0.923 (p-tau217/Aβ42). Among HC and AD continuum participants, CL correlations were - 0.74 (Aβ42/40), 0.81 (p-tau217), and 0.83 (p-tau217/Aβ42). In the HC and AD continuum, Aβ42/40 levels showed a bimodal distribution (cutoff = 0.096), with a shift from high to low occurring at 19.3 CL, compared to the PET positivity threshold of 32.9 CL. P-tau217 exhibited a linear increase with disease progression. All biomarkers correlated strongly with logical memory scores.

Conclusions: Plasma biomarkers, Aβ42/40 and p-tau217, and particularly their ratio (p-tau217/Aβ42), show strong potential as Aβ PET alternatives for AD diagnosis. HISCL-based plasma Aβ42/40 detects Aβ accumulation earlier than Aβ PET visual reading threshold, underscoring its utility as an early diagnostic marker.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信