校外护理专业发展项目的开发和测试:一项试点随机对照试验

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Andrew J. Woods, Yasmine C. Probst, Jennifer Norman, Karen Wardle, Sarah T. Ryan, Linda Patel, Ruth K. Crowe, Megan Hammersley, Kurt Morton, Rebecca M. Stanley, Lauren Taylor, Anthony D. Okely
{"title":"校外护理专业发展项目的开发和测试:一项试点随机对照试验","authors":"Andrew J. Woods,&nbsp;Yasmine C. Probst,&nbsp;Jennifer Norman,&nbsp;Karen Wardle,&nbsp;Sarah T. Ryan,&nbsp;Linda Patel,&nbsp;Ruth K. Crowe,&nbsp;Megan Hammersley,&nbsp;Kurt Morton,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Stanley,&nbsp;Lauren Taylor,&nbsp;Anthony D. Okely","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to describe the co-creation and test the feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of an Out of School Hours Care (OSHC) staff professional development intervention to increase child adherence to moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) guidelines and fruit and vegetable (F&amp;V) provision in the OSHC setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four OSHC services participated in a 1-month, 2-arm pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. Services had their before and after school care programmes visited twice at baseline and at follow-up. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed through recruitment/attendance rates and online feedback surveys. Child MVPA was assessed using Actigraph accelerometers and F&amp;V provision with direct observation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Intervention adherence was feasible, with 60% of total staff employed by services completing the intervention. The intervention was acceptable, with all participants agreeing to the intervention being enjoyable and improving their knowledge of physical activity (PA) and healthy eating. The proportion of children meeting guidelines of 15 min of MVPA in before school care and 30 min in after school care increased over time in both groups. There were no significant between-group differences in these changes; however, small to medium effect sizes were detected. Frequency of fruit provision increased more in before school care intervention programmes and vegetable provision increased more in both before and after school care intervention programmes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A PA and healthy eating professional development intervention in OSHC is both feasible and acceptable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>Larger trials are recommended to evaluate intervention scale-up and effectiveness on child MVPA and service F&amp;V provision.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Testing of an Out-of-School Hours Care Professional Development Program: A Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Woods,&nbsp;Yasmine C. Probst,&nbsp;Jennifer Norman,&nbsp;Karen Wardle,&nbsp;Sarah T. Ryan,&nbsp;Linda Patel,&nbsp;Ruth K. Crowe,&nbsp;Megan Hammersley,&nbsp;Kurt Morton,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Stanley,&nbsp;Lauren Taylor,&nbsp;Anthony D. Okely\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpja.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to describe the co-creation and test the feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of an Out of School Hours Care (OSHC) staff professional development intervention to increase child adherence to moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) guidelines and fruit and vegetable (F&amp;V) provision in the OSHC setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four OSHC services participated in a 1-month, 2-arm pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. Services had their before and after school care programmes visited twice at baseline and at follow-up. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed through recruitment/attendance rates and online feedback surveys. Child MVPA was assessed using Actigraph accelerometers and F&amp;V provision with direct observation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intervention adherence was feasible, with 60% of total staff employed by services completing the intervention. The intervention was acceptable, with all participants agreeing to the intervention being enjoyable and improving their knowledge of physical activity (PA) and healthy eating. The proportion of children meeting guidelines of 15 min of MVPA in before school care and 30 min in after school care increased over time in both groups. There were no significant between-group differences in these changes; however, small to medium effect sizes were detected. Frequency of fruit provision increased more in before school care intervention programmes and vegetable provision increased more in both before and after school care intervention programmes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>A PA and healthy eating professional development intervention in OSHC is both feasible and acceptable.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> So What?</h3>\\n \\n <p>Larger trials are recommended to evaluate intervention scale-up and effectiveness on child MVPA and service F&amp;V provision.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70056\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究的目的是描述共同创造和测试的可行性,可接受性和潜在功效的校外护理(OSHC)工作人员专业发展干预,以提高儿童遵守中强度到高强度的身体活动(MVPA)指南和水果和蔬菜(F&;V)的设置。方法4家OSHC服务机构参与了为期1个月的2组随机对照试验。在基线和随访期间,对服务机构的课前和课后照料方案进行了两次访问。通过招聘/出勤率和在线反馈调查评估可行性和可接受性。使用Actigraph加速计和F&;V提供直接观察来评估儿童MVPA。结果干预依从性是可行的,服务机构雇用的总员工中有60%完成了干预。干预是可以接受的,所有参与者都同意干预是愉快的,并提高了他们对体育活动(PA)和健康饮食的认识。两组儿童在上学前照顾15分钟和放学后照顾30分钟达到MVPA指导方针的比例随着时间的推移而增加。这些变化在组间无显著差异;然而,检测到小到中等的效应量。在学校保育干预计划之前,水果供应的频率增加更多,在学校保育干预计划之前和之后,蔬菜供应的频率增加更多。结论PA和健康饮食专业发展干预在职业健康健康中心是可行和可接受的。那又怎样?建议进行更大规模的试验,以评估儿童MVPA和服务f&v提供的干预规模和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Testing of an Out-of-School Hours Care Professional Development Program: A Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

Background

The aim of this study was to describe the co-creation and test the feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of an Out of School Hours Care (OSHC) staff professional development intervention to increase child adherence to moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) guidelines and fruit and vegetable (F&V) provision in the OSHC setting.

Methods

Four OSHC services participated in a 1-month, 2-arm pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. Services had their before and after school care programmes visited twice at baseline and at follow-up. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed through recruitment/attendance rates and online feedback surveys. Child MVPA was assessed using Actigraph accelerometers and F&V provision with direct observation.

Results

Intervention adherence was feasible, with 60% of total staff employed by services completing the intervention. The intervention was acceptable, with all participants agreeing to the intervention being enjoyable and improving their knowledge of physical activity (PA) and healthy eating. The proportion of children meeting guidelines of 15 min of MVPA in before school care and 30 min in after school care increased over time in both groups. There were no significant between-group differences in these changes; however, small to medium effect sizes were detected. Frequency of fruit provision increased more in before school care intervention programmes and vegetable provision increased more in both before and after school care intervention programmes.

Conclusions

A PA and healthy eating professional development intervention in OSHC is both feasible and acceptable.

So What?

Larger trials are recommended to evaluate intervention scale-up and effectiveness on child MVPA and service F&V provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信