在农村社区采取基于优势的心理健康方法：利用优势的证据是什么？

IF 1.9 4区医学 Q2 NURSING

Australian Journal of Rural Health Pub Date : 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1111/ajr.70061

Annika Luebbe, Sandra Diminic, Zoe Rutherford, Hannah Roovers, Mikesh Patel, Harvey Whiteford

{"title":"在农村社区采取基于优势的心理健康方法：利用优势的证据是什么？","authors":"Annika Luebbe, Sandra Diminic, Zoe Rutherford, Hannah Roovers, Mikesh Patel, Harvey Whiteford","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to determine if rural community strengths identified in the literature have been causally linked to improved mental health and whether these strengths have been harnessed in interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A secondary analysis of a systematic review of literature from Australia, Canada and the USA identified 28 studies that proposed a conceptual relationship to improved mental health. Studies were categorised, their distribution across a socioecological framework was assessed, and evidence of causality was evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 28 studies, 24 were analytical and focused mainly on community strengths, with four interventional studies that addressed both personnel and community strengths. None established a causal relationship, including those that harnessed strengths in interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although rural strengths have been associated with improved mental health, evidence on causality, effectiveness and mechanisms for harnessing remains limited. Strengthening the evidence base is critical to justify incorporating rural strengths into mental health commissioning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking a Strengths-Based Approach to Mental Health in Rural Communities: What Is the Evidence for Harnessing Strengths?\",\"authors\":\"Annika Luebbe, Sandra Diminic, Zoe Rutherford, Hannah Roovers, Mikesh Patel, Harvey Whiteford\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to determine if rural community strengths identified in the literature have been causally linked to improved mental health and whether these strengths have been harnessed in interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A secondary analysis of a systematic review of literature from Australia, Canada and the USA identified 28 studies that proposed a conceptual relationship to improved mental health. Studies were categorised, their distribution across a socioecological framework was assessed, and evidence of causality was evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 28 studies, 24 were analytical and focused mainly on community strengths, with four interventional studies that addressed both personnel and community strengths. None established a causal relationship, including those that harnessed strengths in interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although rural strengths have been associated with improved mental health, evidence on causality, effectiveness and mechanisms for harnessing remains limited. Strengthening the evidence base is critical to justify incorporating rural strengths into mental health commissioning.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70061\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在确定文献中确定的农村社区优势是否与改善心理健康有因果关系，以及这些优势是否已在干预措施中得到利用。方法对来自澳大利亚、加拿大和美国的文献系统综述进行二次分析，确定了28项研究，提出了改善心理健康的概念关系。对研究进行分类，评估其在社会生态框架中的分布，并评估因果关系的证据。结果在28项研究中，24项是分析性的，主要关注社区优势，4项干入性研究涉及人员和社区优势。没有一个建立了因果关系，包括那些利用干预措施优势的研究。结论：尽管农村优势与改善心理健康有关，但关于因果关系、有效性和利用机制的证据仍然有限。加强证据基础对于证明将农村优势纳入精神卫生委托工作的合理性至关重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Taking a Strengths-Based Approach to Mental Health in Rural Communities: What Is the Evidence for Harnessing Strengths?

Objective

This study aimed to determine if rural community strengths identified in the literature have been causally linked to improved mental health and whether these strengths have been harnessed in interventions.

Methods

A secondary analysis of a systematic review of literature from Australia, Canada and the USA identified 28 studies that proposed a conceptual relationship to improved mental health. Studies were categorised, their distribution across a socioecological framework was assessed, and evidence of causality was evaluated.

Results

Among 28 studies, 24 were analytical and focused mainly on community strengths, with four interventional studies that addressed both personnel and community strengths. None established a causal relationship, including those that harnessed strengths in interventions.

Conclusions

Although rural strengths have been associated with improved mental health, evidence on causality, effectiveness and mechanisms for harnessing remains limited. Strengthening the evidence base is critical to justify incorporating rural strengths into mental health commissioning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

16.70%

发文量

122

审稿时长

12 months

期刊介绍： The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.