环境DNA记录了海洋保护区Stellwagen Bank国家海洋保护区生态系统的生物多样性

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Jennifer M. Polinski, Emma L. Strand, Timothy P. O'Donnell, Tammy L. Silva, David N. Wiley, Matthew J. Harke
{"title":"环境DNA记录了海洋保护区Stellwagen Bank国家海洋保护区生态系统的生物多样性","authors":"Jennifer M. Polinski,&nbsp;Emma L. Strand,&nbsp;Timothy P. O'Donnell,&nbsp;Tammy L. Silva,&nbsp;David N. Wiley,&nbsp;Matthew J. Harke","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine protected areas (MPAs) can help ensure long-term conservation of natural resources and protect biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural values in the face of anthropogenic change. However, determining MPA effectiveness is often challenging due to the lack of comprehensive baseline data and/or biases associated with biodiversity survey methods. Environmental DNA (eDNA) represents a promising tool to overcome these challenges. Here, we used a suite of three metabarcoding targets—prokaryote-specific 16S, eukaryote-specific 18S, and vertebrate-specific 12S—to generate baseline data of all organisms, from bacteria to whales, within Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary (SBNMS). Surface water, bottom water, and sediment from 40 sites revealed three archaeal, 46 bacterial, 22 protistan, and 17 metazoan phyla. eDNA offers insight into the spatial resolution of biodiversity within SBNMS, potentially providing a new tool which could inform management practices to protect biodiversity. For vertebrate eDNA monitoring, most species were observed in bottom water, suggesting that less extensive sampling could be sufficient if targeting overall vertebrate richness. However, the inclusion of other sample types revealed patterns in relative sequence abundance that may be indicative of habitat use, particularly for Northern sand lance, a key forage fish. Microbial, phytoplankton, and zooplankton community composition differed dramatically between sample types, requiring all three to adequately capture species richness, providing data for potential indicator species such as those that cause harmful algal blooms. While future evaluations of cost, sampling scope, frequency, and how to incorporate data into management practices are needed, this study offers important baseline information for new hypotheses testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental DNA Documents Ecosystem-Wide Biodiversity Within the Marine Protected Area Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer M. Polinski,&nbsp;Emma L. Strand,&nbsp;Timothy P. O'Donnell,&nbsp;Tammy L. Silva,&nbsp;David N. Wiley,&nbsp;Matthew J. Harke\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Marine protected areas (MPAs) can help ensure long-term conservation of natural resources and protect biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural values in the face of anthropogenic change. However, determining MPA effectiveness is often challenging due to the lack of comprehensive baseline data and/or biases associated with biodiversity survey methods. Environmental DNA (eDNA) represents a promising tool to overcome these challenges. Here, we used a suite of three metabarcoding targets—prokaryote-specific 16S, eukaryote-specific 18S, and vertebrate-specific 12S—to generate baseline data of all organisms, from bacteria to whales, within Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary (SBNMS). Surface water, bottom water, and sediment from 40 sites revealed three archaeal, 46 bacterial, 22 protistan, and 17 metazoan phyla. eDNA offers insight into the spatial resolution of biodiversity within SBNMS, potentially providing a new tool which could inform management practices to protect biodiversity. For vertebrate eDNA monitoring, most species were observed in bottom water, suggesting that less extensive sampling could be sufficient if targeting overall vertebrate richness. However, the inclusion of other sample types revealed patterns in relative sequence abundance that may be indicative of habitat use, particularly for Northern sand lance, a key forage fish. Microbial, phytoplankton, and zooplankton community composition differed dramatically between sample types, requiring all three to adequately capture species richness, providing data for potential indicator species such as those that cause harmful algal blooms. While future evaluations of cost, sampling scope, frequency, and how to incorporate data into management practices are needed, this study offers important baseline information for new hypotheses testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70138\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海洋保护区(MPAs)有助于确保自然资源的长期保护,并在面对人为变化时保护生物多样性、生态系统服务和文化价值。然而,由于缺乏全面的基线数据和/或与生物多样性调查方法相关的偏见,确定海洋保护区的有效性往往具有挑战性。环境DNA (eDNA)是克服这些挑战的一种有前途的工具。在这里,我们使用了一套三种元条形码目标-原核特异性16S,真核特异性18S和脊椎动物特异性12s -来生成从细菌到鲸鱼的所有生物的基线数据,这些生物在Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary (SBNMS)中。从40个地点的地表水、底水和沉积物中发现了3个古细菌门、46个细菌门、22个原生动物门和17个后生动物门。eDNA提供了对SBNMS内生物多样性空间分辨率的洞察,可能为保护生物多样性的管理实践提供新的工具。对于脊椎动物的eDNA监测,大多数物种是在底水中观察到的,这表明如果针对脊椎动物的整体丰富度,较少的采样就足够了。然而,包括其他类型的样本揭示了相对序列丰度的模式,这可能表明栖息地的利用,特别是北方沙枪鱼,一种重要的饲料鱼。微生物、浮游植物和浮游动物的群落组成在不同的样品类型之间存在显著差异,这需要所有三种样品充分捕获物种丰富度,为潜在的指示物种(如导致有害藻华的物种)提供数据。虽然未来需要对成本、采样范围、频率以及如何将数据纳入管理实践进行评估,但本研究为新的假设测试提供了重要的基线信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental DNA Documents Ecosystem-Wide Biodiversity Within the Marine Protected Area Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary

Marine protected areas (MPAs) can help ensure long-term conservation of natural resources and protect biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural values in the face of anthropogenic change. However, determining MPA effectiveness is often challenging due to the lack of comprehensive baseline data and/or biases associated with biodiversity survey methods. Environmental DNA (eDNA) represents a promising tool to overcome these challenges. Here, we used a suite of three metabarcoding targets—prokaryote-specific 16S, eukaryote-specific 18S, and vertebrate-specific 12S—to generate baseline data of all organisms, from bacteria to whales, within Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary (SBNMS). Surface water, bottom water, and sediment from 40 sites revealed three archaeal, 46 bacterial, 22 protistan, and 17 metazoan phyla. eDNA offers insight into the spatial resolution of biodiversity within SBNMS, potentially providing a new tool which could inform management practices to protect biodiversity. For vertebrate eDNA monitoring, most species were observed in bottom water, suggesting that less extensive sampling could be sufficient if targeting overall vertebrate richness. However, the inclusion of other sample types revealed patterns in relative sequence abundance that may be indicative of habitat use, particularly for Northern sand lance, a key forage fish. Microbial, phytoplankton, and zooplankton community composition differed dramatically between sample types, requiring all three to adequately capture species richness, providing data for potential indicator species such as those that cause harmful algal blooms. While future evaluations of cost, sampling scope, frequency, and how to incorporate data into management practices are needed, this study offers important baseline information for new hypotheses testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信