日本Medaka不同大小组分环境RNA的全面测序及与皮肤拭子RNA的比较

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Kyoshiro Hiki, Toshiaki S. Jo
{"title":"日本Medaka不同大小组分环境RNA的全面测序及与皮肤拭子RNA的比较","authors":"Kyoshiro Hiki,&nbsp;Toshiaki S. Jo","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental RNA (eRNA) is emerging as a non-invasive tool for assessing the molecular status and physiological responses of macro-organisms, but key information on its origin and particle sizes remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal filter pore size range for eRNA analysis and evaluate the contribution of skin and mucus to eRNA profiles. We performed comprehensive RNA-sequencing of eRNA (&gt; 13 Gb/sample) collected from tank water containing Japanese medaka (<i>Oryzias latipes</i>), using sequential filtration through filters with pore sizes of 10, 3, and 0.4 μm. Fish skin and mucus RNA was collected using a cotton swab, then sequenced, and compared with eRNA. Our results showed that the 3–10 μm fraction contained the lowest relative abundance of microbial RNA, the highest amount of medaka eRNA, and the largest number of detected medaka genes (5398 genes), while the 0.4–3 μm fraction had the fewest (972 genes). Only a small number of genes (42 genes) were unique to the 0.4–3 μm fraction. These findings suggest that a 3 μm filter is optimal for eRNA analysis, as it allows for larger filtration volumes while maintaining the relative abundance of macro-organism eRNA. Furthermore, 81% of the genes detected in eRNA overlapped with skin swab, indicating skin and mucus are major sources of fish eRNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70137","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Sequencing of Environmental RNA From Japanese Medaka at Various Size Fractions and Comparison With Skin Swab RNA\",\"authors\":\"Kyoshiro Hiki,&nbsp;Toshiaki S. Jo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Environmental RNA (eRNA) is emerging as a non-invasive tool for assessing the molecular status and physiological responses of macro-organisms, but key information on its origin and particle sizes remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal filter pore size range for eRNA analysis and evaluate the contribution of skin and mucus to eRNA profiles. We performed comprehensive RNA-sequencing of eRNA (&gt; 13 Gb/sample) collected from tank water containing Japanese medaka (<i>Oryzias latipes</i>), using sequential filtration through filters with pore sizes of 10, 3, and 0.4 μm. Fish skin and mucus RNA was collected using a cotton swab, then sequenced, and compared with eRNA. Our results showed that the 3–10 μm fraction contained the lowest relative abundance of microbial RNA, the highest amount of medaka eRNA, and the largest number of detected medaka genes (5398 genes), while the 0.4–3 μm fraction had the fewest (972 genes). Only a small number of genes (42 genes) were unique to the 0.4–3 μm fraction. These findings suggest that a 3 μm filter is optimal for eRNA analysis, as it allows for larger filtration volumes while maintaining the relative abundance of macro-organism eRNA. Furthermore, 81% of the genes detected in eRNA overlapped with skin swab, indicating skin and mucus are major sources of fish eRNA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70137\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境RNA (Environmental RNA, eRNA)作为一种评估大型生物分子状态和生理反应的非侵入性工具正在兴起,但关于其起源和颗粒大小的关键信息尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们旨在确定用于eRNA分析的最佳过滤器孔径范围,并评估皮肤和粘液对eRNA谱的贡献。我们采用孔径分别为10、3和0.4 μm的过滤器,对从含有日本稻鳉(Oryzias latipes)的水箱水中采集的eRNA (>; 13 Gb/样品)进行了全面的rna测序。用棉签收集鱼皮和黏液RNA,然后测序,并与eRNA进行比较。结果表明,3 ~ 10 μm馏分微生物RNA相对丰度最低,medaka eRNA含量最高,检测到的medaka基因最多(5398个),而0.4 ~ 3 μm馏分检测到的medaka基因最少(972个)。只有少数基因(42个)是0.4-3 μm组分所特有的。这些研究结果表明,3 μm过滤器最适合进行eRNA分析,因为它允许更大的过滤体积,同时保持大型生物eRNA的相对丰度。此外,在eRNA中检测到的81%的基因与皮肤拭子重叠,表明皮肤和粘液是鱼类eRNA的主要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive Sequencing of Environmental RNA From Japanese Medaka at Various Size Fractions and Comparison With Skin Swab RNA

Environmental RNA (eRNA) is emerging as a non-invasive tool for assessing the molecular status and physiological responses of macro-organisms, but key information on its origin and particle sizes remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal filter pore size range for eRNA analysis and evaluate the contribution of skin and mucus to eRNA profiles. We performed comprehensive RNA-sequencing of eRNA (> 13 Gb/sample) collected from tank water containing Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes), using sequential filtration through filters with pore sizes of 10, 3, and 0.4 μm. Fish skin and mucus RNA was collected using a cotton swab, then sequenced, and compared with eRNA. Our results showed that the 3–10 μm fraction contained the lowest relative abundance of microbial RNA, the highest amount of medaka eRNA, and the largest number of detected medaka genes (5398 genes), while the 0.4–3 μm fraction had the fewest (972 genes). Only a small number of genes (42 genes) were unique to the 0.4–3 μm fraction. These findings suggest that a 3 μm filter is optimal for eRNA analysis, as it allows for larger filtration volumes while maintaining the relative abundance of macro-organism eRNA. Furthermore, 81% of the genes detected in eRNA overlapped with skin swab, indicating skin and mucus are major sources of fish eRNA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信