评价第二语言教材输入对语法学习的影响:从研究结果到可操作的评价标准

Raphaël Perrin, Anita Thomas
{"title":"评价第二语言教材输入对语法学习的影响:从研究结果到可操作的评价标准","authors":"Raphaël Perrin,&nbsp;Anita Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prior studies investigating the quality of linguistic input in L2 textbooks have mainly focused on lexical frequencies for vocabulary development. The present study explores how previous findings on the role of salience, frequency, and explicit instruction can be used in the form of operationalized criteria to evaluate input quality in L2 textbooks for the learning of grammatical target features. To this aim, we have reviewed research on the subject, suggested evaluation criteria based on this literature, and chosen two French textbooks and two sample target features – the position of French reflexive pronouns and their coreference with the subject – to explore the applicability of the criteria.</div><div>The example analysis suggests that the developed criteria are applicable and useful for evaluating L2 textbook input quality for the learning of grammatical features. However, the example analysis also highlights several challenges, such as interpreting frequency counts in the absence of benchmarks. More complete textbook analyses are needed to test the applicability of the suggested approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating L2 textbook input for grammar learning: from research findings to operationalized evaluation criteria\",\"authors\":\"Raphaël Perrin,&nbsp;Anita Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Prior studies investigating the quality of linguistic input in L2 textbooks have mainly focused on lexical frequencies for vocabulary development. The present study explores how previous findings on the role of salience, frequency, and explicit instruction can be used in the form of operationalized criteria to evaluate input quality in L2 textbooks for the learning of grammatical target features. To this aim, we have reviewed research on the subject, suggested evaluation criteria based on this literature, and chosen two French textbooks and two sample target features – the position of French reflexive pronouns and their coreference with the subject – to explore the applicability of the criteria.</div><div>The example analysis suggests that the developed criteria are applicable and useful for evaluating L2 textbook input quality for the learning of grammatical features. However, the example analysis also highlights several challenges, such as interpreting frequency counts in the absence of benchmarks. More complete textbook analyses are needed to test the applicability of the suggested approach.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往对二语教材中语言输入质量的研究主要集中在词汇发展的词汇频率上。本研究探讨了如何将先前关于显著性、频率和显性指令的作用的研究结果以可操作化标准的形式用于评估第二语言教科书中语法目标特征学习的输入质量。为此,我们回顾了这一主题的研究,提出了基于这些文献的评价标准,并选择了两本法语教科书和两个样本目标特征-法语反身代词的位置及其与主题的共指性-来探讨标准的适用性。实例分析表明,该标准可用于评价第二语言教材语法特征学习输入质量。然而,示例分析也强调了一些挑战,例如在没有基准测试的情况下解释频率计数。需要更完整的教科书分析来测试所建议方法的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating L2 textbook input for grammar learning: from research findings to operationalized evaluation criteria
Prior studies investigating the quality of linguistic input in L2 textbooks have mainly focused on lexical frequencies for vocabulary development. The present study explores how previous findings on the role of salience, frequency, and explicit instruction can be used in the form of operationalized criteria to evaluate input quality in L2 textbooks for the learning of grammatical target features. To this aim, we have reviewed research on the subject, suggested evaluation criteria based on this literature, and chosen two French textbooks and two sample target features – the position of French reflexive pronouns and their coreference with the subject – to explore the applicability of the criteria.
The example analysis suggests that the developed criteria are applicable and useful for evaluating L2 textbook input quality for the learning of grammatical features. However, the example analysis also highlights several challenges, such as interpreting frequency counts in the absence of benchmarks. More complete textbook analyses are needed to test the applicability of the suggested approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信