{"title":"欧洲刑警组织与成员国就非法披露个人数据造成的损害承担的连带责任(对欧洲法院的评论,2024年3月5日,C - 755/ 21p)","authors":"Andrea Parziale","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This case note examines a judgment by the Court of Justice on Europol's civil liability for unlawful disclosure of personal data during cross-border cooperation with Member State authorities. The Court overturned the General Court's decision, establishing that joint and several liability between Europol and Member States can arise under Article 50 of Regulation 2016/794 (Europol Regulation), informed by Recital 57. While this ruling facilitates compensation for injured parties when the exact source of data disclosure cannot be identified, the Court awarded only €2000 in damages to the appellant, a modest sum that may undermine Article 50′s effectiveness as a data protection mechanism. The case note analyzes both the joint liability determination and the damages quantification, arguing that while the recognition of joint liability strengthens data subject protection in principle, the symbolic damages awarded significantly limit its practical impact as an accountability tool for ensuring responsible data handling in cross-border criminal investigations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 106161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint and several liability between Europol and a Member State for damages from unlawful disclosure of personal data (comment on European Court of Justice, 5 March 2024, C‑755/21 P)\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Parziale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This case note examines a judgment by the Court of Justice on Europol's civil liability for unlawful disclosure of personal data during cross-border cooperation with Member State authorities. The Court overturned the General Court's decision, establishing that joint and several liability between Europol and Member States can arise under Article 50 of Regulation 2016/794 (Europol Regulation), informed by Recital 57. While this ruling facilitates compensation for injured parties when the exact source of data disclosure cannot be identified, the Court awarded only €2000 in damages to the appellant, a modest sum that may undermine Article 50′s effectiveness as a data protection mechanism. The case note analyzes both the joint liability determination and the damages quantification, arguing that while the recognition of joint liability strengthens data subject protection in principle, the symbolic damages awarded significantly limit its practical impact as an accountability tool for ensuring responsible data handling in cross-border criminal investigations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212473X25000343\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212473X25000343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Joint and several liability between Europol and a Member State for damages from unlawful disclosure of personal data (comment on European Court of Justice, 5 March 2024, C‑755/21 P)
This case note examines a judgment by the Court of Justice on Europol's civil liability for unlawful disclosure of personal data during cross-border cooperation with Member State authorities. The Court overturned the General Court's decision, establishing that joint and several liability between Europol and Member States can arise under Article 50 of Regulation 2016/794 (Europol Regulation), informed by Recital 57. While this ruling facilitates compensation for injured parties when the exact source of data disclosure cannot be identified, the Court awarded only €2000 in damages to the appellant, a modest sum that may undermine Article 50′s effectiveness as a data protection mechanism. The case note analyzes both the joint liability determination and the damages quantification, arguing that while the recognition of joint liability strengthens data subject protection in principle, the symbolic damages awarded significantly limit its practical impact as an accountability tool for ensuring responsible data handling in cross-border criminal investigations.
期刊介绍:
CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.