有限的住房准入加剧了沿海脆弱社区面临的洪水风险

IF 5.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Fatemeh Janatabadi, Alireza Ermagun
{"title":"有限的住房准入加剧了沿海脆弱社区面临的洪水风险","authors":"Fatemeh Janatabadi,&nbsp;Alireza Ermagun","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study integrates coastal flood risk with access to shelter to detect priority areas and identify at-risk communities in coastal communities across the United States. The need is evident due to the escalation of flood hazards driven by sea-level rise and intensifying storm surges, the deterioration of aging infrastructure that undermines vulnerability, and the omission of shelter access in conventional risk assessments. While existing frameworks often emphasize physical exposure and hazard intensity, little is known about the integration of coastal flood risk with access to shelter in risk assessments. A bivariate spatial clustering method is employed to integrate coastal flood risk with access to shelter at the census block group level. Two findings are discerned. First, there is a mismatch between flood risk and access to shelter in coastal communities: high-risk areas tend to have limited shelter access. Of approximately 80,000 square miles exposed to high flood risk, 98 % are characterized by low shelter access, placing 17.8 million people (64 % of the population) in areas with limited emergency shelter availability. Second, racial and ethnic minorities (African Americans and Hispanics), along with mobility-vulnerable populations (the elderly and people with disabilities), are disproportionately exposed to coastal flood risks coupled with limited shelter access, particularly in Mississippi, Indiana, Texas, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania. The findings offer policy and planning guidance to support effective emergency response and resource allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 103686"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited shelter access exacerbates coastal flood risks for vulnerable communities\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Janatabadi,&nbsp;Alireza Ermagun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study integrates coastal flood risk with access to shelter to detect priority areas and identify at-risk communities in coastal communities across the United States. The need is evident due to the escalation of flood hazards driven by sea-level rise and intensifying storm surges, the deterioration of aging infrastructure that undermines vulnerability, and the omission of shelter access in conventional risk assessments. While existing frameworks often emphasize physical exposure and hazard intensity, little is known about the integration of coastal flood risk with access to shelter in risk assessments. A bivariate spatial clustering method is employed to integrate coastal flood risk with access to shelter at the census block group level. Two findings are discerned. First, there is a mismatch between flood risk and access to shelter in coastal communities: high-risk areas tend to have limited shelter access. Of approximately 80,000 square miles exposed to high flood risk, 98 % are characterized by low shelter access, placing 17.8 million people (64 % of the population) in areas with limited emergency shelter availability. Second, racial and ethnic minorities (African Americans and Hispanics), along with mobility-vulnerable populations (the elderly and people with disabilities), are disproportionately exposed to coastal flood risks coupled with limited shelter access, particularly in Mississippi, Indiana, Texas, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania. The findings offer policy and planning guidance to support effective emergency response and resource allocation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geography\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014362282500181X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014362282500181X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究将沿海洪水风险与获得避难所结合起来,以检测优先区域并确定美国沿海社区的风险社区。由于海平面上升和风暴潮加剧导致洪水灾害升级,老化的基础设施恶化,破坏了脆弱性,以及传统风险评估中遗漏了住房准入,这一需求是显而易见的。虽然现有的框架往往强调实际暴露和灾害强度,但在风险评估中对将沿海洪水风险与获得庇护所的情况结合起来知之甚少。采用双变量空间聚类方法,将沿海洪水风险与人口普查区群体水平上的住房可及性进行整合。有两个发现是显而易见的。首先,在沿海社区,洪水风险和避难所之间存在不匹配:高风险地区往往有有限的避难所。在大约8万平方英里面临高洪水风险的地区中,98%的地区的特点是缺乏住房,使1 780万人(占人口的64%)居住在应急住房有限的地区。其次,种族和少数民族(非裔美国人和西班牙裔美国人)以及流动性脆弱人群(老年人和残疾人)不成比例地暴露在沿海洪水风险中,同时避难所有限,特别是在密西西比州、印第安纳州、德克萨斯州、南卡罗来纳州和宾夕法尼亚州。调查结果为支持有效的应急反应和资源分配提供了政策和规划指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limited shelter access exacerbates coastal flood risks for vulnerable communities
This study integrates coastal flood risk with access to shelter to detect priority areas and identify at-risk communities in coastal communities across the United States. The need is evident due to the escalation of flood hazards driven by sea-level rise and intensifying storm surges, the deterioration of aging infrastructure that undermines vulnerability, and the omission of shelter access in conventional risk assessments. While existing frameworks often emphasize physical exposure and hazard intensity, little is known about the integration of coastal flood risk with access to shelter in risk assessments. A bivariate spatial clustering method is employed to integrate coastal flood risk with access to shelter at the census block group level. Two findings are discerned. First, there is a mismatch between flood risk and access to shelter in coastal communities: high-risk areas tend to have limited shelter access. Of approximately 80,000 square miles exposed to high flood risk, 98 % are characterized by low shelter access, placing 17.8 million people (64 % of the population) in areas with limited emergency shelter availability. Second, racial and ethnic minorities (African Americans and Hispanics), along with mobility-vulnerable populations (the elderly and people with disabilities), are disproportionately exposed to coastal flood risks coupled with limited shelter access, particularly in Mississippi, Indiana, Texas, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania. The findings offer policy and planning guidance to support effective emergency response and resource allocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信