本科有机化学导论:主动学习工作室的表现趋势和影响

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rachel S. H. Heeren, Seth R. Kinoshita, Laura Lu and Pamela Pollet*, 
{"title":"本科有机化学导论:主动学习工作室的表现趋势和影响","authors":"Rachel S. H. Heeren,&nbsp;Seth R. Kinoshita,&nbsp;Laura Lu and Pamela Pollet*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0141310.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Organic chemistry courses are often regarded as a bottleneck for undergraduates pursuing STEM- and health-related fields. This study reports a decade-long analysis of performance trends in two introductory organic chemistry courses (9254 students, 18 instructors). We investigated the impact of academic preparation and instructional interventions (“studio”) as well as variables such as sociodemographic groups and transfer status. Statistical analyses, including multilevel linear modeling, suggest that standardized math scores (SAT) significantly correlate with student performance. Furthermore, the implementation of evidence-based active learning strategies (studios) significantly enhanced students’ success in the course by about 0.46 course GPA points. It also reduced the withdrawal rate (DFW) by 59% for non-underrepresented minority (URM) students and 49% for URM students, highlighting the impact of scalable and interactive pedagogies. Additionally, the study underscores that transfer students face the greatest challenge, with grades 0.32 course GPA points lower compared to nontransfer students, independent of preparation or instructional pedagogies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 6","pages":"2294–2304 2294–2304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01413","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undergraduate Introductory Organic Chemistry: Performance Trends and Impact of Active Learning Studios\",\"authors\":\"Rachel S. H. Heeren,&nbsp;Seth R. Kinoshita,&nbsp;Laura Lu and Pamela Pollet*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0141310.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Organic chemistry courses are often regarded as a bottleneck for undergraduates pursuing STEM- and health-related fields. This study reports a decade-long analysis of performance trends in two introductory organic chemistry courses (9254 students, 18 instructors). We investigated the impact of academic preparation and instructional interventions (“studio”) as well as variables such as sociodemographic groups and transfer status. Statistical analyses, including multilevel linear modeling, suggest that standardized math scores (SAT) significantly correlate with student performance. Furthermore, the implementation of evidence-based active learning strategies (studios) significantly enhanced students’ success in the course by about 0.46 course GPA points. It also reduced the withdrawal rate (DFW) by 59% for non-underrepresented minority (URM) students and 49% for URM students, highlighting the impact of scalable and interactive pedagogies. Additionally, the study underscores that transfer students face the greatest challenge, with grades 0.32 course GPA points lower compared to nontransfer students, independent of preparation or instructional pedagogies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"102 6\",\"pages\":\"2294–2304 2294–2304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01413\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01413\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有机化学课程通常被认为是本科生追求STEM和健康相关领域的瓶颈。本研究报告了对两门有机化学入门课程(9254名学生,18名教师)长达十年的表现趋势的分析。我们调查了学术准备和教学干预(“工作室”)以及社会人口统计学群体和迁移状态等变量的影响。包括多层次线性模型在内的统计分析表明,标准化数学成绩(SAT)与学生的表现显著相关。此外,基于证据的主动学习策略(工作室)的实施显著提高了学生在课程中的成功,课程GPA约为0.46分。它还将非代表性不足的少数民族(URM)学生的退学率(DFW)降低了59%,URM学生的退学率(DFW)降低了49%,突出了可扩展和互动教学法的影响。此外,该研究强调,转校生面临的挑战最大,与非转校生相比,他们的成绩比非转校生低0.32分,这与准备或教学方法无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Undergraduate Introductory Organic Chemistry: Performance Trends and Impact of Active Learning Studios

Organic chemistry courses are often regarded as a bottleneck for undergraduates pursuing STEM- and health-related fields. This study reports a decade-long analysis of performance trends in two introductory organic chemistry courses (9254 students, 18 instructors). We investigated the impact of academic preparation and instructional interventions (“studio”) as well as variables such as sociodemographic groups and transfer status. Statistical analyses, including multilevel linear modeling, suggest that standardized math scores (SAT) significantly correlate with student performance. Furthermore, the implementation of evidence-based active learning strategies (studios) significantly enhanced students’ success in the course by about 0.46 course GPA points. It also reduced the withdrawal rate (DFW) by 59% for non-underrepresented minority (URM) students and 49% for URM students, highlighting the impact of scalable and interactive pedagogies. Additionally, the study underscores that transfer students face the greatest challenge, with grades 0.32 course GPA points lower compared to nontransfer students, independent of preparation or instructional pedagogies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信