突发性感音神经性听力损失研究中的研究挑战:利用大型单一临床实践数据库的调查。

Sarah E Hodge, Karen I Berliner, Rachel Grimes, William Slattery, Kevin A Peng
{"title":"突发性感音神经性听力损失研究中的研究挑战:利用大型单一临床实践数据库的调查。","authors":"Sarah E Hodge, Karen I Berliner, Rachel Grimes, William Slattery, Kevin A Peng","doi":"10.1177/00034894251344767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze SSNHL patient data from a single large multi-physician institution to determine the nature of confounding factors that must be considered in designing adequate studies for improved diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of a random sample of 330 patients (mean age = 61 yrs (19-96); 45% F) diagnosed with idiopathic SSNHL from 2013 to 2022 from a tertiary referral clinical practice. Data included demographics, treatment modality (oral prednisone only, intratympanic dexamethasone [IT Dex] only, or a combination of both) and regimen, time to treatment, and pure-tone averages (PTA) and word recognition scores (WRS). Different hearing outcomes were assessed, including recovery category (Complete, Partial, No Recovery) rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 56% of patients had a >30 dB loss compared to the contralateral ear, while PTA and WRS both ranged widely (6 dB-NR; 0%-100%). Oral steroids were the most common treatment (83%), used alone in 32.4%, with IT Dex injections used in 68.8%, but as only treatment in 17%. 50.6% received both treatments. Hearing outcomes were generally poor, with small improvements in PTA (mean improvement = -9.5 dB, SD = 18.7) and WRS (mean improvement = 9.1%, SD = 27.7) across all subjects, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups and a high rate of no recovery (76.2%). Pretreatment PTA followed by treatment timing (≤14 days, >14 days) and treatment type contributed significantly to predicting amount of change in PTA but accounted for only a small portion of the variability in regression analysis (R<sup>2</sup> = .232, <i>P</i> ≤ .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hearing outcomes with standard steroid treatments remain suboptimal. Patients presenting for treatment of SSNHL in clinical practice can vary greatly from the formal definition of SSNHL, and past studies may not be generalizable to the overall population of patients. This highlights the challenges in defining and treating SSNHL in a clinical environment and identifies confounding factors to be considered in future research designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520787,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894251344767"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Research Challenges in the Study of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: An Investigation Utilizing a Large Single Clinical Practice Database.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E Hodge, Karen I Berliner, Rachel Grimes, William Slattery, Kevin A Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00034894251344767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze SSNHL patient data from a single large multi-physician institution to determine the nature of confounding factors that must be considered in designing adequate studies for improved diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of a random sample of 330 patients (mean age = 61 yrs (19-96); 45% F) diagnosed with idiopathic SSNHL from 2013 to 2022 from a tertiary referral clinical practice. Data included demographics, treatment modality (oral prednisone only, intratympanic dexamethasone [IT Dex] only, or a combination of both) and regimen, time to treatment, and pure-tone averages (PTA) and word recognition scores (WRS). Different hearing outcomes were assessed, including recovery category (Complete, Partial, No Recovery) rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 56% of patients had a >30 dB loss compared to the contralateral ear, while PTA and WRS both ranged widely (6 dB-NR; 0%-100%). Oral steroids were the most common treatment (83%), used alone in 32.4%, with IT Dex injections used in 68.8%, but as only treatment in 17%. 50.6% received both treatments. Hearing outcomes were generally poor, with small improvements in PTA (mean improvement = -9.5 dB, SD = 18.7) and WRS (mean improvement = 9.1%, SD = 27.7) across all subjects, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups and a high rate of no recovery (76.2%). Pretreatment PTA followed by treatment timing (≤14 days, >14 days) and treatment type contributed significantly to predicting amount of change in PTA but accounted for only a small portion of the variability in regression analysis (R<sup>2</sup> = .232, <i>P</i> ≤ .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hearing outcomes with standard steroid treatments remain suboptimal. Patients presenting for treatment of SSNHL in clinical practice can vary greatly from the formal definition of SSNHL, and past studies may not be generalizable to the overall population of patients. This highlights the challenges in defining and treating SSNHL in a clinical environment and identifies confounding factors to be considered in future research designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34894251344767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251344767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251344767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析来自单一大型多医生机构的SSNHL患者数据,以确定在设计充分的研究以改进诊断和治疗时必须考虑的混杂因素的性质。方法:随机抽取330例患者进行回顾性分析,平均年龄61岁(19-96岁);从2013年至2022年三级转诊临床实践中,45%的患者被诊断为特发性SSNHL。数据包括人口统计学、治疗方式(仅口服强的松、仅鼓内地塞米松,或两者联合)和治疗方案、治疗时间、纯音平均值(PTA)和单词识别评分(WRS)。评估不同的听力结果,包括恢复类别(完全、部分、无恢复)率。结果:与对侧耳相比,只有56%的患者有bb10 - 30db的损失,而PTA和WRS的范围都很广(6db - nr;0% - -100%)。口服类固醇是最常见的治疗方法(83%),单独使用的占32.4%,注射的占68.8%,但仅作为治疗的占17%。50.6%的患者同时接受两种治疗。听力结果普遍较差,所有受试者的PTA(平均改善= -9.5 dB, SD = 18.7)和WRS(平均改善= 9.1%,SD = 27.7)改善较小,治疗组间差异无统计学意义,无恢复率高(76.2%)。预处理PTA,其次是治疗时间(≤14天,>14天)和治疗类型对预测PTA的变化量有显著贡献,但在回归分析中仅占变异的一小部分(R2 =)。232, p≤0.001)。结论:标准类固醇治疗的听力结果仍不理想。临床实践中就诊的SSNHL患者可能与SSNHL的正式定义存在很大差异,过去的研究可能无法推广到总体患者群体。这突出了在临床环境中定义和治疗SSNHL的挑战,并确定了未来研究设计中需要考虑的混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Research Challenges in the Study of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: An Investigation Utilizing a Large Single Clinical Practice Database.

Objectives: To analyze SSNHL patient data from a single large multi-physician institution to determine the nature of confounding factors that must be considered in designing adequate studies for improved diagnosis and treatment.

Methods: Retrospective review of a random sample of 330 patients (mean age = 61 yrs (19-96); 45% F) diagnosed with idiopathic SSNHL from 2013 to 2022 from a tertiary referral clinical practice. Data included demographics, treatment modality (oral prednisone only, intratympanic dexamethasone [IT Dex] only, or a combination of both) and regimen, time to treatment, and pure-tone averages (PTA) and word recognition scores (WRS). Different hearing outcomes were assessed, including recovery category (Complete, Partial, No Recovery) rates.

Results: Only 56% of patients had a >30 dB loss compared to the contralateral ear, while PTA and WRS both ranged widely (6 dB-NR; 0%-100%). Oral steroids were the most common treatment (83%), used alone in 32.4%, with IT Dex injections used in 68.8%, but as only treatment in 17%. 50.6% received both treatments. Hearing outcomes were generally poor, with small improvements in PTA (mean improvement = -9.5 dB, SD = 18.7) and WRS (mean improvement = 9.1%, SD = 27.7) across all subjects, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups and a high rate of no recovery (76.2%). Pretreatment PTA followed by treatment timing (≤14 days, >14 days) and treatment type contributed significantly to predicting amount of change in PTA but accounted for only a small portion of the variability in regression analysis (R2 = .232, P ≤ .001).

Conclusions: Hearing outcomes with standard steroid treatments remain suboptimal. Patients presenting for treatment of SSNHL in clinical practice can vary greatly from the formal definition of SSNHL, and past studies may not be generalizable to the overall population of patients. This highlights the challenges in defining and treating SSNHL in a clinical environment and identifies confounding factors to be considered in future research designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信