评估商业单细胞RNA测序技术的实际方面和性能。

Anna E Elz, Derrik Gratz, Annalyssa Long, David Sowerby, Azi Hadadianpour, Evan W Newell
{"title":"评估商业单细胞RNA测序技术的实际方面和性能。","authors":"Anna E Elz, Derrik Gratz, Annalyssa Long, David Sowerby, Azi Hadadianpour, Evan W Newell","doi":"10.1101/2025.05.19.654974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid development of updated and new commercially available single-cell transcriptomics platforms provides users with a range of experimental options. Cost, sensitivity, throughput, flexibility, and ease of use, all influence the selection of an optimal workflow. We performed a comprehensive comparison of single-cell transcriptomic approaches using multiple standardized PBMCs from different donors. We report on standard single-cell metrics including cell recovery, sequencing efficiency, sensitivity, cell annotation, and differential gene expression for seven recently available kits that interrogate whole transcriptome mRNA, and two that include TCR profiling. We also discuss workflow throughput, sample requirements, timing, cost, and labor as critical factors to consider. In addition to variable experimental constraints imposed by each platform, our findings highlight differences in cell recovery and sensitivity, which we found to significantly influence the ability to resolve cell subtypes. This work provides a basis by which users can balance performance and practical considerations when selecting a single-cell RNA sequencing platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":519960,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the practical aspects and performance of commercial single-cell RNA sequencing technologies.\",\"authors\":\"Anna E Elz, Derrik Gratz, Annalyssa Long, David Sowerby, Azi Hadadianpour, Evan W Newell\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2025.05.19.654974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rapid development of updated and new commercially available single-cell transcriptomics platforms provides users with a range of experimental options. Cost, sensitivity, throughput, flexibility, and ease of use, all influence the selection of an optimal workflow. We performed a comprehensive comparison of single-cell transcriptomic approaches using multiple standardized PBMCs from different donors. We report on standard single-cell metrics including cell recovery, sequencing efficiency, sensitivity, cell annotation, and differential gene expression for seven recently available kits that interrogate whole transcriptome mRNA, and two that include TCR profiling. We also discuss workflow throughput, sample requirements, timing, cost, and labor as critical factors to consider. In addition to variable experimental constraints imposed by each platform, our findings highlight differences in cell recovery and sensitivity, which we found to significantly influence the ability to resolve cell subtypes. This work provides a basis by which users can balance performance and practical considerations when selecting a single-cell RNA sequencing platform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139828/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.19.654974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.19.654974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

更新和新的商业单细胞转录组学平台的快速发展为用户提供了一系列的实验选择。成本、灵敏度、吞吐量、灵活性和易用性都会影响最佳工作流程的选择。我们使用来自不同供体的多个标准化pbmc进行了单细胞转录组学方法的全面比较。我们报告了标准的单细胞指标,包括细胞回收率、测序效率、灵敏度、细胞注释和差异基因表达,用于询问全转录组mRNA的七个最近可用的试剂盒,以及两个包括TCR分析的试剂盒。我们还将讨论工作流吞吐量、样本需求、时间、成本和劳动力作为需要考虑的关键因素。除了每个平台施加的可变实验约束外,我们的研究结果还突出了细胞恢复和敏感性的差异,我们发现这些差异显著影响了分解细胞亚型的能力。这项工作为用户在选择单细胞RNA测序平台时平衡性能和实际考虑提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the practical aspects and performance of commercial single-cell RNA sequencing technologies.

The rapid development of updated and new commercially available single-cell transcriptomics platforms provides users with a range of experimental options. Cost, sensitivity, throughput, flexibility, and ease of use, all influence the selection of an optimal workflow. We performed a comprehensive comparison of single-cell transcriptomic approaches using multiple standardized PBMCs from different donors. We report on standard single-cell metrics including cell recovery, sequencing efficiency, sensitivity, cell annotation, and differential gene expression for seven recently available kits that interrogate whole transcriptome mRNA, and two that include TCR profiling. We also discuss workflow throughput, sample requirements, timing, cost, and labor as critical factors to consider. In addition to variable experimental constraints imposed by each platform, our findings highlight differences in cell recovery and sensitivity, which we found to significantly influence the ability to resolve cell subtypes. This work provides a basis by which users can balance performance and practical considerations when selecting a single-cell RNA sequencing platform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信