社会孤立、社会排斥以及获得精神和有形资源:绘制南非东开普省肺结核患者中与结核病有关的耻辱对性别的影响。

Andrew Medina-Marino, Lindsey de Vos, Joseph Daniels
{"title":"社会孤立、社会排斥以及获得精神和有形资源:绘制南非东开普省肺结核患者中与结核病有关的耻辱对性别的影响。","authors":"Andrew Medina-Marino, Lindsey de Vos, Joseph Daniels","doi":"10.1186/s44263-025-00166-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2022, an estimated 10.6 million people developed tuberculosis (TB) globally, with men bearing a greater burden of disease compared to women. In South Africa specifically, men experience higher risks of poor outcomes and TB-related mortality than women. Stigma and isolation among people living with tuberculosis (PLWTB) are well documented. The gendered pathways through which TB-related stigma leads to isolation or impacts access to resources during one's illness-to-health journey are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed PLWTB receiving treatment at government clinics in Buffalo City Metro Health District, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Semi-structured guides explored TB symptom experiences, access to care, treatment motivation, key supporters, and access to mental and tangible resources (MTRs) during illness. Open coding was done inductively, with MTR domains informed by the Network-Individual-Resource Model. Findings were analyzed through a cyclic, iterative, and deductive process using social isolation and exclusion as interpretive lenses. Memos and pathway mapping examined gendered differences in stigma, isolation, and access to networked MTRs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-two PLWTB (men = 86; women = 56) were interviewed. PLWTB described pervasive TB stigma and isolation. Women described self-isolating in response to enacted and anticipated stigma. Men described active exclusion by friends and family. Women's maintenance of familial ties facilitated access to MTRs while ill. Men's systematic exclusion (e.g., deliberate or forced by peers or family) reduced their agency to access resources. Men and women described regaining physical strength and recovery of social networks through treatment, but also the sustained impacts of post-treatment stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified gendered pathways through which TB stigma and isolation affect access to MTRs. For women, stigma led to social isolation, but familial networks helped maintain access to MTRs, fostering resilience. Men experienced social exclusion, reduced agency to access MTRs, and increased vulnerability during illness. Findings can guide gender-responsive interventions to reduce the impact of TB stigma on health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social isolation, social exclusion, and access to mental and tangible resources: mapping the gendered impact of tuberculosis-related stigma among men and women living with tuberculosis in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Medina-Marino, Lindsey de Vos, Joseph Daniels\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44263-025-00166-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2022, an estimated 10.6 million people developed tuberculosis (TB) globally, with men bearing a greater burden of disease compared to women. In South Africa specifically, men experience higher risks of poor outcomes and TB-related mortality than women. Stigma and isolation among people living with tuberculosis (PLWTB) are well documented. The gendered pathways through which TB-related stigma leads to isolation or impacts access to resources during one's illness-to-health journey are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed PLWTB receiving treatment at government clinics in Buffalo City Metro Health District, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Semi-structured guides explored TB symptom experiences, access to care, treatment motivation, key supporters, and access to mental and tangible resources (MTRs) during illness. Open coding was done inductively, with MTR domains informed by the Network-Individual-Resource Model. Findings were analyzed through a cyclic, iterative, and deductive process using social isolation and exclusion as interpretive lenses. Memos and pathway mapping examined gendered differences in stigma, isolation, and access to networked MTRs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-two PLWTB (men = 86; women = 56) were interviewed. PLWTB described pervasive TB stigma and isolation. Women described self-isolating in response to enacted and anticipated stigma. Men described active exclusion by friends and family. Women's maintenance of familial ties facilitated access to MTRs while ill. Men's systematic exclusion (e.g., deliberate or forced by peers or family) reduced their agency to access resources. Men and women described regaining physical strength and recovery of social networks through treatment, but also the sustained impacts of post-treatment stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified gendered pathways through which TB stigma and isolation affect access to MTRs. For women, stigma led to social isolation, but familial networks helped maintain access to MTRs, fostering resilience. Men experienced social exclusion, reduced agency to access MTRs, and increased vulnerability during illness. Findings can guide gender-responsive interventions to reduce the impact of TB stigma on health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00166-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00166-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2022年,全球估计有1060万人罹患结核病,与女性相比,男性承担的疾病负担更大。特别是在南非,男性面临的不良后果和结核病相关死亡风险高于女性。结核病患者的耻辱感和孤立已得到充分记录。人们对结核病相关的污名导致孤立或影响一个人在从疾病到健康的旅程中获得资源的性别途径知之甚少。方法:我们访问了在南非东开普省布法罗城市地铁卫生区政府诊所接受治疗的PLWTB。半结构化指南探讨了结核病症状经历、获得护理、治疗动机、主要支持者以及疾病期间获得精神和有形资源(MTRs)的情况。开放编码采用归纳编码,MTR域采用网络-个体-资源模型。研究结果通过循环、迭代和演绎的过程进行分析,使用社会隔离和排斥作为解释镜头。备忘录和路径映射检查了在耻辱、隔离和获得联网mtr方面的性别差异。结果:PLWTB 142例(男性86例;受访女性为56人。PLWTB描述了普遍存在的结核病耻辱感和隔离。妇女描述了自我隔离,以应对已制定和预期的耻辱。男性则表示被朋友和家人主动排斥。妇女维持家庭关系有助于她们在生病时获得中期治疗。男性的系统性排斥(例如,同伴或家庭故意或强迫)降低了他们获取资源的能力。男性和女性描述了通过治疗恢复体力和恢复社交网络,但也描述了治疗后耻辱的持续影响。结论:我们确定了结核病污名化和隔离影响获得耐药药物的性别途径。对妇女来说,污名导致社会孤立,但家庭网络有助于保持获得中期治疗的机会,增强复原力。男性经历了社会排斥,减少了获得mtr的能力,并且在疾病期间更容易受到伤害。研究结果可以指导促进性别平等的干预措施,以减少结核病污名对健康结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social isolation, social exclusion, and access to mental and tangible resources: mapping the gendered impact of tuberculosis-related stigma among men and women living with tuberculosis in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.

Background: In 2022, an estimated 10.6 million people developed tuberculosis (TB) globally, with men bearing a greater burden of disease compared to women. In South Africa specifically, men experience higher risks of poor outcomes and TB-related mortality than women. Stigma and isolation among people living with tuberculosis (PLWTB) are well documented. The gendered pathways through which TB-related stigma leads to isolation or impacts access to resources during one's illness-to-health journey are poorly understood.

Methods: We interviewed PLWTB receiving treatment at government clinics in Buffalo City Metro Health District, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Semi-structured guides explored TB symptom experiences, access to care, treatment motivation, key supporters, and access to mental and tangible resources (MTRs) during illness. Open coding was done inductively, with MTR domains informed by the Network-Individual-Resource Model. Findings were analyzed through a cyclic, iterative, and deductive process using social isolation and exclusion as interpretive lenses. Memos and pathway mapping examined gendered differences in stigma, isolation, and access to networked MTRs.

Results: One hundred forty-two PLWTB (men = 86; women = 56) were interviewed. PLWTB described pervasive TB stigma and isolation. Women described self-isolating in response to enacted and anticipated stigma. Men described active exclusion by friends and family. Women's maintenance of familial ties facilitated access to MTRs while ill. Men's systematic exclusion (e.g., deliberate or forced by peers or family) reduced their agency to access resources. Men and women described regaining physical strength and recovery of social networks through treatment, but also the sustained impacts of post-treatment stigma.

Conclusions: We identified gendered pathways through which TB stigma and isolation affect access to MTRs. For women, stigma led to social isolation, but familial networks helped maintain access to MTRs, fostering resilience. Men experienced social exclusion, reduced agency to access MTRs, and increased vulnerability during illness. Findings can guide gender-responsive interventions to reduce the impact of TB stigma on health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信