妊娠期和非妊娠期绒毛膜癌的预后:一项使用图和网络工具的回顾性队列研究。

Women's health (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI:10.1177/17455057251344386
Sakhr Alshwayyat, Mahmoud Bashar Abu Al Hawa, Karam Maraqa, Tala Abdulsalam Alshwayyat, Mustafa Alshwayyat, Hamdah Hanifa, Tala Alsaghir
{"title":"妊娠期和非妊娠期绒毛膜癌的预后:一项使用图和网络工具的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Sakhr Alshwayyat, Mahmoud Bashar Abu Al Hawa, Karam Maraqa, Tala Abdulsalam Alshwayyat, Mustafa Alshwayyat, Hamdah Hanifa, Tala Alsaghir","doi":"10.1177/17455057251344386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Choriocarcinoma (CC), a rare and aggressive form of cancer, is composed of cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts. It is present in two subtypes: gestational choriocarcinoma (GCC) and non-gestational choriocarcinoma (NGCC). Recognizing the disparities between GCC and NGCC is essential for the precise staging, prognosis, and determination of the primary treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to differentiate clinical outcomes, treatment responses, and prognostic factors between GCC and NGCC and to introduce innovative tools for personalized treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study with Survival Analysis and Nomogram Development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and identified female patients diagnosed with GCC and NGCC between 2000 and 2020. The clinicopathological features of each group were compared using the chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to assess overall survival and cancer-specific survival and to determine risk factors. The 5-year survival predicting nomogram was constructed, evaluated, and validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 919 patients with 719 CC and 200 patients with NGCC. The NGCC group was characterized by older age, a higher proportion of married individuals, more advanced disease stages, larger tumor sizes, and a higher frequency of surgical interventions than the GCC group. NGCC was associated with worse survival rates than GCC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the critical role of chemotherapy in improving the survival of patients with NGCC, in contrast to its limited effect on GCC. The negative prognosis associated with radiotherapy underscores the urgent need for further investigation to optimize its use. In addition, the introduction of the first web-based survival prediction tool and predictive nomogram marked a significant advancement in personalized treatment strategies, enabling improved clinical outcomes by tailoring therapy to individual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"21 ","pages":"17455057251344386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes in gestational and non-gestational choriocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study with nomograms and web tools.\",\"authors\":\"Sakhr Alshwayyat, Mahmoud Bashar Abu Al Hawa, Karam Maraqa, Tala Abdulsalam Alshwayyat, Mustafa Alshwayyat, Hamdah Hanifa, Tala Alsaghir\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17455057251344386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Choriocarcinoma (CC), a rare and aggressive form of cancer, is composed of cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts. It is present in two subtypes: gestational choriocarcinoma (GCC) and non-gestational choriocarcinoma (NGCC). Recognizing the disparities between GCC and NGCC is essential for the precise staging, prognosis, and determination of the primary treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to differentiate clinical outcomes, treatment responses, and prognostic factors between GCC and NGCC and to introduce innovative tools for personalized treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study with Survival Analysis and Nomogram Development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and identified female patients diagnosed with GCC and NGCC between 2000 and 2020. The clinicopathological features of each group were compared using the chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to assess overall survival and cancer-specific survival and to determine risk factors. The 5-year survival predicting nomogram was constructed, evaluated, and validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 919 patients with 719 CC and 200 patients with NGCC. The NGCC group was characterized by older age, a higher proportion of married individuals, more advanced disease stages, larger tumor sizes, and a higher frequency of surgical interventions than the GCC group. NGCC was associated with worse survival rates than GCC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the critical role of chemotherapy in improving the survival of patients with NGCC, in contrast to its limited effect on GCC. The negative prognosis associated with radiotherapy underscores the urgent need for further investigation to optimize its use. In addition, the introduction of the first web-based survival prediction tool and predictive nomogram marked a significant advancement in personalized treatment strategies, enabling improved clinical outcomes by tailoring therapy to individual patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"17455057251344386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251344386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251344386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:绒毛膜癌(CC)是一种罕见的侵袭性癌症,由细胞滋养细胞和合细胞滋养细胞组成。它存在于两种亚型:妊娠绒毛膜癌(GCC)和非妊娠绒毛膜癌(NGCC)。认识到GCC和NGCC之间的差异对于精确分期、预后和确定主要治疗策略至关重要。目的:本研究旨在区分GCC和NGCC的临床结果、治疗反应和预后因素,并为个性化治疗策略引入创新工具。设计:采用生存分析和Nomogram发展的回顾性队列研究。方法:我们分析了来自美国国家癌症研究所监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的数据,并确定了2000年至2020年间诊断为GCC和NGCC的女性患者。采用卡方检验比较各组临床病理特征。Kaplan-Meier曲线、log-rank检验和Cox比例风险回归用于评估总生存率和癌症特异性生存率,并确定危险因素。构建、评估和验证5年生存预测nomogram。结果:研究纳入919例719 CC和200例NGCC患者。与GCC组相比,NGCC组的特点是年龄更大,已婚个体比例更高,疾病阶段更晚期,肿瘤大小更大,手术干预频率更高。NGCC患者的生存率低于GCC患者。结论:本研究强调了化疗在改善NGCC患者生存方面的关键作用,而对GCC的作用有限。与放疗相关的不良预后强调迫切需要进一步研究以优化其使用。此外,第一个基于网络的生存预测工具和预测图的引入标志着个性化治疗策略的重大进步,通过针对个体患者定制治疗来改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes in gestational and non-gestational choriocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study with nomograms and web tools.

Background: Choriocarcinoma (CC), a rare and aggressive form of cancer, is composed of cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts. It is present in two subtypes: gestational choriocarcinoma (GCC) and non-gestational choriocarcinoma (NGCC). Recognizing the disparities between GCC and NGCC is essential for the precise staging, prognosis, and determination of the primary treatment strategy.

Objective: This study aimed to differentiate clinical outcomes, treatment responses, and prognostic factors between GCC and NGCC and to introduce innovative tools for personalized treatment strategies.

Design: A retrospective cohort study with Survival Analysis and Nomogram Development.

Methods: We analyzed data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and identified female patients diagnosed with GCC and NGCC between 2000 and 2020. The clinicopathological features of each group were compared using the chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to assess overall survival and cancer-specific survival and to determine risk factors. The 5-year survival predicting nomogram was constructed, evaluated, and validated.

Results: The study included 919 patients with 719 CC and 200 patients with NGCC. The NGCC group was characterized by older age, a higher proportion of married individuals, more advanced disease stages, larger tumor sizes, and a higher frequency of surgical interventions than the GCC group. NGCC was associated with worse survival rates than GCC patients.

Conclusions: This study highlights the critical role of chemotherapy in improving the survival of patients with NGCC, in contrast to its limited effect on GCC. The negative prognosis associated with radiotherapy underscores the urgent need for further investigation to optimize its use. In addition, the introduction of the first web-based survival prediction tool and predictive nomogram marked a significant advancement in personalized treatment strategies, enabling improved clinical outcomes by tailoring therapy to individual patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信