父亲和非亲生父母在儿童和家庭卫生服务方面的经验:系统回顾和综合。

Catina Adams, Shannon Bennetts, Lael Ridgway, Leesa Hooker, Christine East, Kristina Edvardsson
{"title":"父亲和非亲生父母在儿童和家庭卫生服务方面的经验:系统回顾和综合。","authors":"Catina Adams, Shannon Bennetts, Lael Ridgway, Leesa Hooker, Christine East, Kristina Edvardsson","doi":"10.1071/PY24228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background This study aimed to synthesise global research examining the experiences of fathers and non-birth parents using child and family health services, and to identify the facilitators and barriers to father- and non-birth parent-inclusive practice. Methods A systematic review, using the Joanna Briggs Institute mixed-methods approach, and meta-synthesis of the data were performed. We undertook a quality appraisal of the research using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool. An initial systematic search was conducted of four scientific databases (ProQuest Central, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE) in January 2023, and updated in February 2024. Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines with no patient or public contribution. Results We identified thirty-five studies for inclusion. Thirty-one papers identified barriers to inclusive practice, such as program design (n =15), traditional gender roles and gatekeeping (n =11), and lack of workforce knowledge and skills (n =11). Facilitators of inclusive practice included factors such as explicit inclusion (n =14), support with transition to parenthood (n =11), connection with other fathers (6), and attention to the father's health and well-being (n =13). The four papers that concerned same-sex parents identified additional and specific barriers experienced by same-sex parents, including discrimination and homophobic attitudes. Conclusion We found barriers and facilitators of father and non-birth parent engagement in child and family health services at individual, community, and health service levels, with organisational and cultural barriers impacting inclusive practice. Inclusive practice for fathers and non-birth parents entails the development of environments, policies, and programs that actively involve and support the father and non-birth parent in all aspects of parenting and family life. Strategies include systematic outreach to fathers and non-birth parents, customising activities to fathers' and non-birth parents' preferences, and addressing their needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Father and non-birth parent experience of child and family health services: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Catina Adams, Shannon Bennetts, Lael Ridgway, Leesa Hooker, Christine East, Kristina Edvardsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PY24228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background This study aimed to synthesise global research examining the experiences of fathers and non-birth parents using child and family health services, and to identify the facilitators and barriers to father- and non-birth parent-inclusive practice. Methods A systematic review, using the Joanna Briggs Institute mixed-methods approach, and meta-synthesis of the data were performed. We undertook a quality appraisal of the research using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool. An initial systematic search was conducted of four scientific databases (ProQuest Central, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE) in January 2023, and updated in February 2024. Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines with no patient or public contribution. Results We identified thirty-five studies for inclusion. Thirty-one papers identified barriers to inclusive practice, such as program design (n =15), traditional gender roles and gatekeeping (n =11), and lack of workforce knowledge and skills (n =11). Facilitators of inclusive practice included factors such as explicit inclusion (n =14), support with transition to parenthood (n =11), connection with other fathers (6), and attention to the father's health and well-being (n =13). The four papers that concerned same-sex parents identified additional and specific barriers experienced by same-sex parents, including discrimination and homophobic attitudes. Conclusion We found barriers and facilitators of father and non-birth parent engagement in child and family health services at individual, community, and health service levels, with organisational and cultural barriers impacting inclusive practice. Inclusive practice for fathers and non-birth parents entails the development of environments, policies, and programs that actively involve and support the father and non-birth parent in all aspects of parenting and family life. Strategies include systematic outreach to fathers and non-birth parents, customising activities to fathers' and non-birth parents' preferences, and addressing their needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在综合全球研究,考察父亲和非亲生父母使用儿童和家庭卫生服务的经验,并确定父亲和非亲生父母包容做法的促进因素和障碍。方法采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的混合方法进行系统综述,并对数据进行meta综合。我们使用多样化研究质量评估(QuADS)工具对研究进行了质量评估。于2023年1月对ProQuest Central、CINAHL、MEDLINE、EMBASE四个科学数据库进行了初步系统检索,并于2024年2月进行了更新。结果根据PRISMA指南报告,没有患者或公众贡献。结果我们确定了35项研究纳入。31篇论文确定了包容性实践的障碍,如项目设计(n =15)、传统的性别角色和把关(n =11)以及缺乏劳动力知识和技能(n =11)。包容性实践的促进因素包括明确包容(n =14)、支持向为人父母的过渡(n =11)、与其他父亲的联系(6)以及关注父亲的健康和福祉(n =13)等因素。这四篇关于同性父母的论文指出了同性父母所经历的额外和具体的障碍,包括歧视和对同性恋的态度。结论:我们发现父亲和非亲生父母在个人、社区和卫生服务层面参与儿童和家庭卫生服务的障碍和促进因素,组织和文化障碍影响包容性实践。父亲和非亲生父母的包容性实践需要环境、政策和项目的发展,这些环境、政策和项目积极地参与和支持父亲和非亲生父母在养育子女和家庭生活的各个方面。战略包括系统地与父亲和非亲生父母接触,根据父亲和非亲生父母的偏好定制活动,并解决他们的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Father and non-birth parent experience of child and family health services: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Background This study aimed to synthesise global research examining the experiences of fathers and non-birth parents using child and family health services, and to identify the facilitators and barriers to father- and non-birth parent-inclusive practice. Methods A systematic review, using the Joanna Briggs Institute mixed-methods approach, and meta-synthesis of the data were performed. We undertook a quality appraisal of the research using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool. An initial systematic search was conducted of four scientific databases (ProQuest Central, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE) in January 2023, and updated in February 2024. Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines with no patient or public contribution. Results We identified thirty-five studies for inclusion. Thirty-one papers identified barriers to inclusive practice, such as program design (n =15), traditional gender roles and gatekeeping (n =11), and lack of workforce knowledge and skills (n =11). Facilitators of inclusive practice included factors such as explicit inclusion (n =14), support with transition to parenthood (n =11), connection with other fathers (6), and attention to the father's health and well-being (n =13). The four papers that concerned same-sex parents identified additional and specific barriers experienced by same-sex parents, including discrimination and homophobic attitudes. Conclusion We found barriers and facilitators of father and non-birth parent engagement in child and family health services at individual, community, and health service levels, with organisational and cultural barriers impacting inclusive practice. Inclusive practice for fathers and non-birth parents entails the development of environments, policies, and programs that actively involve and support the father and non-birth parent in all aspects of parenting and family life. Strategies include systematic outreach to fathers and non-birth parents, customising activities to fathers' and non-birth parents' preferences, and addressing their needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信