政治派别与照护责任对照护经济政策的支持。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katherine E M Miller, Jennifer L Wolff, Karen Shen, Sandro Galea, Catherine K Ettman
{"title":"政治派别与照护责任对照护经济政策的支持。","authors":"Katherine E M Miller, Jennifer L Wolff, Karen Shen, Sandro Galea, Catherine K Ettman","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Identifying effective and financially viable strategies to meet the care needs of perons with impaired function is a policy challenge for high-income countries with aging populations. The 2022 National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers identified a range of actions to support caregivers, while family-oriented policies to promote the affordability of care were promoted by both candidates in the 2024 presidential election.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine public perceptions of federal policies to support older adults, adults living with disabilities, and their family caregivers by political affiliation and caregiving status.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study included adults in the CLIMB study, a nationally representative, longitudinal panel. Data were collected in March and April 2024. Data analyses occurred from September 2024 to February 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Self-reported political party affiliation and caregiving responsibility.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Endorsement of 6 policies. Responses based on a 5-point Likert scale were dichotomized to contrast \"strongly\" or \"somewhat support\" with \"strongly oppose,\" \"somewhat oppose,\" and \"neither support nor oppose.\" The probability of support and differences across political affiliations was presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2059 respondents (1035 female individuals [50.9%]; mean [SD] age, 49.0 [18.2] years), 394 (20%) reported having caregiving responsibilities, with no significant difference across political affiliation. Endorsement was highest for policies to make care in facilities (1657 [79.0%]) and homes (1600 [75.4%]) more affordable, expand eligibility for financial access to care (1618 [77.3%]), and increase the capacity of the paid caregiving workforce (1649 [78.3%]) and was lower for expansion of paid family leave (1342 [65.4%]) and payment of family caregivers (1223 [61.2%]). Endorsement by political affiliation was most similar for policies to make care at home more affordable (13.7-percentage point difference; 95% CI, -20.4 to -7.1) and least similar for paid family leave (33.4-percentage point difference; 95% CI, -39.0 to -27.7). While respondents with caregiving responsibilities were more likely to support paying family caregivers, political affiliation was associated with the endorsement of policies to support the care economy that was stronger in magnitude than sociodemographic characteristics (eg, sex) or caregiving experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this cohort study suggest that, despite some differences by political affiliation, there is high support of policies to support the adult care economy, suggesting a policy window to advance legislation and executive action to address the care needs of aging populations and populations with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 6","pages":"e251204"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Support for Care Economy Policies by Political Affiliation and Caregiving Responsibilities.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine E M Miller, Jennifer L Wolff, Karen Shen, Sandro Galea, Catherine K Ettman\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Identifying effective and financially viable strategies to meet the care needs of perons with impaired function is a policy challenge for high-income countries with aging populations. The 2022 National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers identified a range of actions to support caregivers, while family-oriented policies to promote the affordability of care were promoted by both candidates in the 2024 presidential election.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine public perceptions of federal policies to support older adults, adults living with disabilities, and their family caregivers by political affiliation and caregiving status.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study included adults in the CLIMB study, a nationally representative, longitudinal panel. Data were collected in March and April 2024. Data analyses occurred from September 2024 to February 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Self-reported political party affiliation and caregiving responsibility.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Endorsement of 6 policies. Responses based on a 5-point Likert scale were dichotomized to contrast \\\"strongly\\\" or \\\"somewhat support\\\" with \\\"strongly oppose,\\\" \\\"somewhat oppose,\\\" and \\\"neither support nor oppose.\\\" The probability of support and differences across political affiliations was presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2059 respondents (1035 female individuals [50.9%]; mean [SD] age, 49.0 [18.2] years), 394 (20%) reported having caregiving responsibilities, with no significant difference across political affiliation. Endorsement was highest for policies to make care in facilities (1657 [79.0%]) and homes (1600 [75.4%]) more affordable, expand eligibility for financial access to care (1618 [77.3%]), and increase the capacity of the paid caregiving workforce (1649 [78.3%]) and was lower for expansion of paid family leave (1342 [65.4%]) and payment of family caregivers (1223 [61.2%]). Endorsement by political affiliation was most similar for policies to make care at home more affordable (13.7-percentage point difference; 95% CI, -20.4 to -7.1) and least similar for paid family leave (33.4-percentage point difference; 95% CI, -39.0 to -27.7). While respondents with caregiving responsibilities were more likely to support paying family caregivers, political affiliation was associated with the endorsement of policies to support the care economy that was stronger in magnitude than sociodemographic characteristics (eg, sex) or caregiving experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this cohort study suggest that, despite some differences by political affiliation, there is high support of policies to support the adult care economy, suggesting a policy window to advance legislation and executive action to address the care needs of aging populations and populations with disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"e251204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144621/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:确定有效和经济上可行的战略,以满足功能受损者的护理需求,是人口老龄化的高收入国家面临的一项政策挑战。2022年《支持家庭照顾者国家战略》确定了一系列支持照顾者的行动,而两位候选人在2024年总统选举中都提出了以家庭为导向的政策,以提高护理的可负担性。目的:调查公众对支持老年人、残疾人及其家庭照顾者的联邦政策的看法,包括政治派别和照顾者地位。设计、环境和参与者:该队列研究包括全国代表性纵向研究小组CLIMB研究中的成年人。数据收集于2024年3月和4月。数据分析时间为2024年9月至2025年2月。暴露:自我报告的政党关系和照顾责任。主要成果和措施:通过6项政策。基于5分李克特量表的回答被分为“强烈”或“有点支持”与“强烈反对”、“有点反对”和“既不支持也不反对”。提出了支持的可能性和不同政治派别的差异。结果:2059名调查对象中,女性1035人,占50.9%;平均[SD]年龄,49.0[18.2]岁),394(20%)报告有照顾责任,不同政治派别无显著差异。支持政策最高的是使设施(1657人[79.0%])和家庭(1600人[75.4%])更负担得起的护理,扩大经济获得护理的资格(1618人[77.3%]),增加带薪护理劳动力的能力(1649人[78.3%]),而扩大带薪家庭假(1342人[65.4%])和支付家庭护理人员(1223人[61.2%])的政策较低。政治派别对使家庭护理更负担得起的政策的支持最为相似(差异为13.7个百分点;95% CI, -20.4至-7.1),带薪家庭假的情况最不相似(差异33.4个百分点;95% CI, -39.0 ~ -27.7)。虽然承担照顾责任的受访者更有可能支持付费的家庭照顾者,但政治派别与支持照顾经济的政策有关,这比社会人口特征(如性别)或照顾经验更重要。结论和相关性:本队列研究的结果表明,尽管政治派别存在一些差异,但支持成人护理经济的政策得到了高度支持,这表明有一个政策窗口,可以推进立法和行政行动,以解决老年人和残疾人的护理需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Support for Care Economy Policies by Political Affiliation and Caregiving Responsibilities.

Importance: Identifying effective and financially viable strategies to meet the care needs of perons with impaired function is a policy challenge for high-income countries with aging populations. The 2022 National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers identified a range of actions to support caregivers, while family-oriented policies to promote the affordability of care were promoted by both candidates in the 2024 presidential election.

Objective: To examine public perceptions of federal policies to support older adults, adults living with disabilities, and their family caregivers by political affiliation and caregiving status.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included adults in the CLIMB study, a nationally representative, longitudinal panel. Data were collected in March and April 2024. Data analyses occurred from September 2024 to February 2025.

Exposures: Self-reported political party affiliation and caregiving responsibility.

Main outcomes and measures: Endorsement of 6 policies. Responses based on a 5-point Likert scale were dichotomized to contrast "strongly" or "somewhat support" with "strongly oppose," "somewhat oppose," and "neither support nor oppose." The probability of support and differences across political affiliations was presented.

Results: Of 2059 respondents (1035 female individuals [50.9%]; mean [SD] age, 49.0 [18.2] years), 394 (20%) reported having caregiving responsibilities, with no significant difference across political affiliation. Endorsement was highest for policies to make care in facilities (1657 [79.0%]) and homes (1600 [75.4%]) more affordable, expand eligibility for financial access to care (1618 [77.3%]), and increase the capacity of the paid caregiving workforce (1649 [78.3%]) and was lower for expansion of paid family leave (1342 [65.4%]) and payment of family caregivers (1223 [61.2%]). Endorsement by political affiliation was most similar for policies to make care at home more affordable (13.7-percentage point difference; 95% CI, -20.4 to -7.1) and least similar for paid family leave (33.4-percentage point difference; 95% CI, -39.0 to -27.7). While respondents with caregiving responsibilities were more likely to support paying family caregivers, political affiliation was associated with the endorsement of policies to support the care economy that was stronger in magnitude than sociodemographic characteristics (eg, sex) or caregiving experiences.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that, despite some differences by political affiliation, there is high support of policies to support the adult care economy, suggesting a policy window to advance legislation and executive action to address the care needs of aging populations and populations with disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信