掌侧锁定钢板治疗舟状骨骨折不愈合术后掌侧钢板撞击:回顾性病例系列。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Michael J Stoltz, Nolan Smith, Eric Metzman, James Gainer, John A Nyland, Victor L Fehrenbacher, Amit Gupta, Luke P Robinson
{"title":"掌侧锁定钢板治疗舟状骨骨折不愈合术后掌侧钢板撞击:回顾性病例系列。","authors":"Michael J Stoltz, Nolan Smith, Eric Metzman, James Gainer, John A Nyland, Victor L Fehrenbacher, Amit Gupta, Luke P Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Internal fixation using volar locking plates is one surgical option for addressing scaphoid fracture nonunion. Concerns about impingement and plate removal remain, and there is limited literature on imaging findings. This study assessed volar plate impingement (VPI) using a classification based on radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of scaphoid waist nonunion with a volar plate and bone grafting. Exclusions included less than 90 days of follow-up, lack of postoperative CT scans, or continued nonunion, which were excluded to eliminate further confounding variables in plate impingement. Three hand surgeons independently reviewed postoperative CT scans and radiographs, classifying VPI into four groups: none, mild (extra-articular wear), moderate (wear/bone loss involving the articular surface), and severe (plate blocking flexion and \"spanning\" the joint). These findings were correlated with plate removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Computed tomography evaluation revealed five patients with no impingement, five mild, six moderate, and five severe. Only two patients exhibited impingement on X-ray evaluation. Eight patients (38%) underwent plate removal because of symptomatic impingement associated with pain or limited flexion. Three of five with severe impingement had plates removed, with one more planned for removal. Three of six with moderate impingement underwent plate removal. The impingement scale showed moderate inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnosis of VPI based on CT scans is common after volar locked plating and occurs along a spectrum of findings ranging from minimal bony change to articular wear/block to motion. Radiographs are less sensitive to VPI and do not correlate with CT. Plate removal should be based on clinical symptoms, and a CT scan is more diagnostic than plain radiographs when evaluating for plate impingement.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volar Plate Impingement Following Scaphoid Fracture Nonunion Surgery Using a Volar Locking Plate: A Retrospective Case Series.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Stoltz, Nolan Smith, Eric Metzman, James Gainer, John A Nyland, Victor L Fehrenbacher, Amit Gupta, Luke P Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Internal fixation using volar locking plates is one surgical option for addressing scaphoid fracture nonunion. Concerns about impingement and plate removal remain, and there is limited literature on imaging findings. This study assessed volar plate impingement (VPI) using a classification based on radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of scaphoid waist nonunion with a volar plate and bone grafting. Exclusions included less than 90 days of follow-up, lack of postoperative CT scans, or continued nonunion, which were excluded to eliminate further confounding variables in plate impingement. Three hand surgeons independently reviewed postoperative CT scans and radiographs, classifying VPI into four groups: none, mild (extra-articular wear), moderate (wear/bone loss involving the articular surface), and severe (plate blocking flexion and \\\"spanning\\\" the joint). These findings were correlated with plate removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Computed tomography evaluation revealed five patients with no impingement, five mild, six moderate, and five severe. Only two patients exhibited impingement on X-ray evaluation. Eight patients (38%) underwent plate removal because of symptomatic impingement associated with pain or limited flexion. Three of five with severe impingement had plates removed, with one more planned for removal. Three of six with moderate impingement underwent plate removal. The impingement scale showed moderate inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnosis of VPI based on CT scans is common after volar locked plating and occurs along a spectrum of findings ranging from minimal bony change to articular wear/block to motion. Radiographs are less sensitive to VPI and do not correlate with CT. Plate removal should be based on clinical symptoms, and a CT scan is more diagnostic than plain radiographs when evaluating for plate impingement.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:掌侧锁定钢板内固定是解决舟状骨骨折不愈合的一种手术选择。对撞击和钢板取出的担忧仍然存在,并且关于影像学发现的文献有限。本研究使用基于x线片和计算机断层扫描(CT)的分类来评估掌侧板撞击(VPI)。方法:对舟状骨腰骨不连行掌侧钢板切开复位内固定植骨的病例进行回顾性分析。排除包括随访少于90天,术后缺乏CT扫描,或持续不愈合,排除这些因素以消除进一步的钢板撞击的混杂变量。三位手外科医生独立审查了术后CT扫描和x线片,将VPI分为四组:无,轻度(关节外磨损),中度(关节表面磨损/骨质流失)和严重(钢板阻塞屈曲和“跨越”关节)。这些发现与钢板移除有关。结果:21例患者符合纳入标准。计算机断层检查显示5例无撞击,5例轻度,6例中度,5例重度。仅有2例患者在x线检查中表现为撞击。8名患者(38%)因疼痛或屈曲受限的症状性撞击而行钢板取出术。5名严重撞击患者中有3名已经取下了钢板,还有1名正在计划取下。6例中度撞击患者中有3例行钢板取出术。冲击量表具有中等的信度。结论:基于CT扫描的VPI诊断在掌侧锁定钢板后很常见,并且发生在从微小的骨改变到关节磨损/阻塞到运动的一系列表现中。x线片对VPI不太敏感,与CT无关。钢板取出应基于临床症状,在评估钢板撞击时,CT扫描比x线平片更具诊断性。研究类型/证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volar Plate Impingement Following Scaphoid Fracture Nonunion Surgery Using a Volar Locking Plate: A Retrospective Case Series.

Purpose: Internal fixation using volar locking plates is one surgical option for addressing scaphoid fracture nonunion. Concerns about impingement and plate removal remain, and there is limited literature on imaging findings. This study assessed volar plate impingement (VPI) using a classification based on radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of scaphoid waist nonunion with a volar plate and bone grafting. Exclusions included less than 90 days of follow-up, lack of postoperative CT scans, or continued nonunion, which were excluded to eliminate further confounding variables in plate impingement. Three hand surgeons independently reviewed postoperative CT scans and radiographs, classifying VPI into four groups: none, mild (extra-articular wear), moderate (wear/bone loss involving the articular surface), and severe (plate blocking flexion and "spanning" the joint). These findings were correlated with plate removal.

Results: Twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Computed tomography evaluation revealed five patients with no impingement, five mild, six moderate, and five severe. Only two patients exhibited impingement on X-ray evaluation. Eight patients (38%) underwent plate removal because of symptomatic impingement associated with pain or limited flexion. Three of five with severe impingement had plates removed, with one more planned for removal. Three of six with moderate impingement underwent plate removal. The impingement scale showed moderate inter-rater reliability.

Conclusions: The diagnosis of VPI based on CT scans is common after volar locked plating and occurs along a spectrum of findings ranging from minimal bony change to articular wear/block to motion. Radiographs are less sensitive to VPI and do not correlate with CT. Plate removal should be based on clinical symptoms, and a CT scan is more diagnostic than plain radiographs when evaluating for plate impingement.

Type of study/level of evidence: Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信