丹麦诊所在癌症后一般晚期效应中的专业角色:一项定性研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
K B Dieperink, R Skøtt, T Mattsson, L B Thisted, C Ø Christensen, L K Tolstrup
{"title":"丹麦诊所在癌症后一般晚期效应中的专业角色:一项定性研究。","authors":"K B Dieperink, R Skøtt, T Mattsson, L B Thisted, C Ø Christensen, L K Tolstrup","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02660-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Late effect clinics (LECs) post-primary cancer treatment emerge. We explored healthcare professionals' experiences working in Danish LECs from a psychodynamic perspective seeking to understand how professionals from different disciplines navigate their roles and collaborate within the context of survivorship care. We employed a qualitative approach through three virtual focus groups with nurses, physicians, and psychologists n = 15. All respectively working in five different LECs with patients and caregivers affected by general late effects after cancer treatment. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes were found: Transformation towards person-centered care, therapeutic space as a precondition, redefined professional boundaries, and challenges due to traditional hospital structures. The themes revealed that patients with late effects and their caregivers require a bio-psychosocial and person-centered approach, with an emphasis on creating a therapeutic space as a prerequisite for cooperation. The professionals were willing to expand their professional boundaries but were challenged by systemic hierarchy and the constant need for competency and team development. Experiences and dynamics within professional roles in Danish LECs have significant implications for rethinking the organization and professional development of care. These insights suggest the need to empower healthcare professionals, adapt to evolving professional roles, and enhance person-centered care in this unique survivorship context. Improved collaboration across roles could provide survivors with more cohesive, supportive care, though traditional hospital hierarchies pose challenges. Increased professional development promises a higher level of tailored, competent care for addressing complex late effects during survivorship.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional Roles in Danish Clinics for General Late Effects After Cancer-A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"K B Dieperink, R Skøtt, T Mattsson, L B Thisted, C Ø Christensen, L K Tolstrup\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02660-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Late effect clinics (LECs) post-primary cancer treatment emerge. We explored healthcare professionals' experiences working in Danish LECs from a psychodynamic perspective seeking to understand how professionals from different disciplines navigate their roles and collaborate within the context of survivorship care. We employed a qualitative approach through three virtual focus groups with nurses, physicians, and psychologists n = 15. All respectively working in five different LECs with patients and caregivers affected by general late effects after cancer treatment. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes were found: Transformation towards person-centered care, therapeutic space as a precondition, redefined professional boundaries, and challenges due to traditional hospital structures. The themes revealed that patients with late effects and their caregivers require a bio-psychosocial and person-centered approach, with an emphasis on creating a therapeutic space as a prerequisite for cooperation. The professionals were willing to expand their professional boundaries but were challenged by systemic hierarchy and the constant need for competency and team development. Experiences and dynamics within professional roles in Danish LECs have significant implications for rethinking the organization and professional development of care. These insights suggest the need to empower healthcare professionals, adapt to evolving professional roles, and enhance person-centered care in this unique survivorship context. Improved collaboration across roles could provide survivors with more cohesive, supportive care, though traditional hospital hierarchies pose challenges. Increased professional development promises a higher level of tailored, competent care for addressing complex late effects during survivorship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02660-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02660-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

晚期效应诊所(LECs)原发性癌症后治疗出现。我们从心理动力学的角度探讨了医疗保健专业人员在丹麦LECs工作的经验,试图了解来自不同学科的专业人员如何在幸存者护理的背景下定位他们的角色和合作。我们采用定性方法,通过三个虚拟焦点小组,护士,医生和心理学家n = 15。他们分别在五个不同的LECs工作,患者和护理人员在癌症治疗后受到一般晚期效应的影响。数据采用专题分析进行分析。研究发现了四个主题:向以人为本的护理转变,以治疗空间为前提,重新定义专业界限,以及传统医院结构带来的挑战。这些主题表明,晚期影响患者及其护理人员需要以生物-社会心理和以人为本的方法,强调创造治疗空间作为合作的先决条件。专业人员愿意扩大他们的专业边界,但受到系统等级制度和不断需要能力和团队发展的挑战。丹麦LECs专业角色中的经验和动态对重新思考护理的组织和专业发展具有重要意义。这些见解表明,需要赋予医疗保健专业人员权力,适应不断发展的专业角色,并在这种独特的生存环境中加强以人为本的护理。尽管传统的医院等级制度带来了挑战,但改善跨角色协作可以为幸存者提供更有凝聚力的支持性护理。增加的专业发展承诺了更高水平的量身定制的、有能力的护理,以解决生存期间复杂的后期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professional Roles in Danish Clinics for General Late Effects After Cancer-A Qualitative Study.

Late effect clinics (LECs) post-primary cancer treatment emerge. We explored healthcare professionals' experiences working in Danish LECs from a psychodynamic perspective seeking to understand how professionals from different disciplines navigate their roles and collaborate within the context of survivorship care. We employed a qualitative approach through three virtual focus groups with nurses, physicians, and psychologists n = 15. All respectively working in five different LECs with patients and caregivers affected by general late effects after cancer treatment. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes were found: Transformation towards person-centered care, therapeutic space as a precondition, redefined professional boundaries, and challenges due to traditional hospital structures. The themes revealed that patients with late effects and their caregivers require a bio-psychosocial and person-centered approach, with an emphasis on creating a therapeutic space as a prerequisite for cooperation. The professionals were willing to expand their professional boundaries but were challenged by systemic hierarchy and the constant need for competency and team development. Experiences and dynamics within professional roles in Danish LECs have significant implications for rethinking the organization and professional development of care. These insights suggest the need to empower healthcare professionals, adapt to evolving professional roles, and enhance person-centered care in this unique survivorship context. Improved collaboration across roles could provide survivors with more cohesive, supportive care, though traditional hospital hierarchies pose challenges. Increased professional development promises a higher level of tailored, competent care for addressing complex late effects during survivorship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信